American green tree frog بیا زود قضاوت نکنیم! تو نگاه اول یکم عجیب بنظر میاد! ولی واقعا خیلی بامزه است. من خودم قورباغه هارو خیلی دوست دارم مخصوصا اونایی که کاملا سبز و تمیزن خیلی بامزه و نازن و واقعا حیوونای جالبی هستن! پروف سبز چنلت خیلی دوست داشتنی بود. چنلت خیلی نمکی و باحاله!

Channel
kkk
@kkkiiiwww
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
1subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 29 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1003966225171 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @kkkiiiwww |
| Created | Between 1 April 2026 and 28 August 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 29 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 7 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 2 times, most recently 7 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/kkkiiiwww |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 30 Aug 2026, 00:13 | 1 | no change |
| 29 Aug 2026, 00:30 | 1 | first reading |
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 28 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 325.0%
- avg views ÷ 1 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 3.3
- 20 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 20
- of 20 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 28 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (28 August 2026 – 28 August 2026) |
| Views total | 65 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 29 Aug 2026, 00:30 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Recent posts
Thomson's gazelle غزال زیباست، نجیبه، و برای بیشتر مردم تحسین برانگیزه. نمیدونم به من حس و حال خونه میده! مثل پروف چنلت!
Chipmunks چی بامزه تر و ناز تر از یه سنجابچه فندقی؟ بغلی و عاشق آجیل! یکی از بامزه ترین حیوونای دنیاست و خیلی فرندلی و خونگرمه مثل وایب چنلت !
Asiatic cheetah اجازه دارم که بگویم یوز ایرانی؟ ببین جذابیت، زیبایی، اصل و نسب، وقار، ابهت اصلاً همه چی تموم! چنلت واقعا جذاب و گیراست و محتوا خیلی جذابی هم داره! خلاصه که بدون خیلی ازش خوشم اومد
Northwestern wolf این یکی خیلی جالب تر بود! گرگ چوبی کانادایی، بزرگترین گرگ از خانواده گرگ های خاکستریه! میتونه بیرحم باشه و هم میتونه فدا کار باشه، بستگی به موقعیتی داره که توش قرار گرفته. همچنین یکی از زیباترین گونه هاست!
Green sea turtle این لاکپشت، وایب اقیانوسی-دریایی خاص خودشو داره! آروم و زیباست و طرح روی لاکش خیلی زیبا و یونیکه درست مثل چنلت که خیلی دیوا و یونیکه!
black Selkirk Rex بامزه ترین پیشی دنیا، موهای فرفری خیلی ناجی داره رنگهای مختلفی داره ولی چنل تو وایب پیشی مشکی داد! این پیشیا چشمای درشتی دارن و خیلی هم شیطون و کیوتن و عاشق بغل کردن هستن!
Mute swan بنظر من قو خیلی کاریزماتیک و جذابه، از نظر برخی هم غمگینه اما همه موافقن که یکی از زیباترین و قابل پرستش ترین پرنده هاست! چنل تو هم جذابیت خاص خودشو داره!
Winter white dwarf hamster یه همستر کوچولو ناز و کیوت و خوردنی با چشمای تیله ای بامزه که خیلی شیطونه و عاشق غذا خوردنه هرکسی هم میبینتش عاشقش میشه! تازه خانومی خیلی خوشگل هستی شما
Maltese dog این هاپو کوچولو خیلی اشرافی و دخترونه و کیوت و تو دلبرو —نژاد مورد علاقمه— یدونه برف تمیز شیطون دوست داشتنییی چنلت خیلی وایب گرلی و نازی داره منو یاد این انداخت تازه نیم چنلت هم خیلی گیرا بود❕ چنلت خیلی خوشگله
Orange American Shorthair خیلی مهمه که نارنجی باشه، چون واقعا وایب گربه نارنجی میدی! یه گربه نارنجی ملوس و تپل که عاشق گشت و گذاره و خیلی کنجکاوه! تازه اون عکس بافتنی که تو پستات دیدم خیلی ناز بود من عاشق بافتنیم!
Old World sparrows خب ازم نپرس چرا... نمیدونم واقعا ولی اولین چیزی که اومد تو ذهنم و بهش فکر کردم گنجشک بود! کوچیک و بامزه است خیلیم قشنگ جیکجیک میکنه
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @kkkiiiwww. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
@Astromatiic · 29,8911 postلـازانیا
@eausxv · 3,0011 post𝘾𝙡𝙤𝙬𝙣𝙨 𝙃𝙤𝙪𝙨𝙚٭
@gililililililililiilili · 1061 post Ö 𝗇𖫲︭͟𝖾 𝗌𝗍︭͟𝖾ּ𝗉 آکادمي
@girlyacm · 1141 post𝐈𝐦𝐩𝐚𝐥𝐚 🪽٫
@impalalovers · 8241 post𝖤́ᥴᥣ𔓘sɪ᥆ᥒ
@it_gi3rl · 1,2311 postDollkoko🆕
@iznayakoko · 1341 post 𝗆𝖺𝗒𝖻ᧉ ꪱ
@maybeii3 · 6911 post「 弁天 」の物語 ꩜˚.
@ne7strawberry · 1651 post 𝘕𝘐𝘕𝘈'𝘚 𝘋𝘐𝘈𝘙𝘠
@NILRANIXA · 1901 postrandom tea
@randomteea · 971 post𝖬𝗂𝗍𝗌𝗒 ヴァニタス
@raxqinx · 1171 post 𝖥𝗋𝖾𝗌𝖼𝖺|پوست و برندها
@Skincare_7 · 2,0751 postچرت اند پرت های زازا ᭢᜴꤬ ᩘຼ᮫
@Zazacasuale · 261 post
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 30 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“kkk” (@kkkiiiwww), 1 subscribers as measured 30 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/kkkiiiwww.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.