Привет! Я Катя - клинический психолог, КПТ-АСТ - терапевт и кризисный психолог.
Этот канал поддерживающее и безопасное пространство для развития гармонии с самим собой 🫶🏻
Запись на консультацию и по вопросам сотрудничества @psy_katrin
Created
Between 1 June 2025 and 30 September 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 193–195 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
8 Aug 2026, 11:48
194
no change
7 Aug 2026, 17:32
194
first reading
Engagement
17 posts held, back to 22 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
28.7%
avg views ÷ 194 subscribers
Avg views / post
55.6
17 posts measured
Reaction rate
19.2%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
17
of 17 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 14 of 17 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026
Posts held
17 (22 July 2026 – 7 August 2026)
Views total
945
Reactions total
151
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
8 Aug 2026, 11:48 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
241
Videos
39
Links
46
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Video runtime
43s
Average length
14s
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
151 reactions across 14 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 39.7% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
custom 5226988887292806847
60
39.7%
custom 5325578753470918304
35
23.2%
custom 5305649465267353225
23
15.2%
custom 5193173493079896258
20
13.2%
custom 5314576254144379935
10
6.62%
custom 5307634749475417271
3
1.99%
Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 151reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 22 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Как часто вы выходите из зоны комфорта?
В социальных сетях так часто звучит призыв почти как универсальный рецепт: хочешь изменений - выйди из зоны комфорта 😌
Но иногда я думаю, а была ли у нас вообще возможность в ней побыть?
Для многих «зона комфорта» - это не про уют, стабильность и спокойствие. Это про привычное напряжение, постоянную тревогу, необходимость всё контролировать и быть удобным. Про отношения, в к…
Книжный клуб с психологом: пространство, где книга становится инструментом изменений
Есть темы, которые хочется исследовать не в одиночку, а в кругу людей, которые понимают.
Книжный клуб - это особое место, где через текст и обсуждение становится видно больше: о себе, о своих паттернах, о том, как вы строите отношения с миром 🤎
Этот клуб для вас, если вы хотите:
🟤 прорабатывать свои запросы через книги и групповую …
Про библиотерапию 📚
Как вы знаете, я работаю в рамках доказательной психологии: использую методы, эффективность которых подтверждена исследованиями.
Библиотерапия - один из таких инструментов.
Исследования показывают:
📎при профессиональном подборе книг и дополнительном сопровождении - симптомы тревоги и депрессии снижаются, а эффект сохраняется месяцами
📎Библиотерапия помогает при стрессе (в том числе у пациенто…
The shares total 167%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Друзья, я пару недель подряд получаю от вас запросы на групповую работу со мной. Честно признаться - вынашивала несколько идей. Рада вам предложить 3 формата, проголосуйте за тот, в котором вам было бы интересно поучаствовать (можно выбрать несколько вариантов)
1️⃣ Книжный клуб с психологом
это регулярные встречи, где группа читает одну книгу и обсуждает её через призму психологии и личного опыта.
Что даёт участни…
Получила от вас ещё несколько интересных вопросов, на каждый отвечу в комментариях, чтобы не спамить. Присаживайтесь, начинаю отвечать ⤵️
1️⃣ Катя, если бы ты была книгой - какой бы ты выбрала жанр и почему?
2️⃣Говорят, интегративный подход видит человека как единое целое - тело, психику, душу. Как ты это понимаешь? Применяешь ли ты это в своей работе? И какие у данного подхода плюсы и минусы по твоему мнению?
…
«Если не хочешь остаться ребёнком навеки, нельзя ждать подсказок от других. Ты должен найти решение в себе самом - почувствовать, что будет правильно. Научись доверять себе».
Эти слова прозвучали для меня особенно громко в спектакле «Цветы для Элджернона».
Всего два актёра и маленькая мышка - и целый мир внутреннего роста героя 🐭
Меня особенно зацепил процесс «терапии» с профессором Немур: как постепенно усложнял…
Выбор психотерапевта - это во многом как выбор врача, которому вы готовы доверить уязвимое. Здесь важно не только «подходит ли человек», но и возникает ли ощущение, что его опыту и рекомендациям можно доверять ⭐️
Иногда это про подбор с первого раза, а иногда это и про право сменить специалиста или даже подход.
⏺Первая важная вещь - это хотя бы примерное понимание своего запроса. Не обязательно формулировать идеа…
📨 Получено сообщение!
Как выбрать своего терапевта? И как понять, что в терапии вы движетесь в правильном направлении и всё не бесполезно?
Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @kkkatrin_psy. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
The shares total 167%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 22 July 2026 to 7 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Екатерина Павлова|Клинический психолог” (@kkkatrin_psy), 194 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/kkkatrin_psy.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
