море
custom 522917691113710048911custom 53977808602734426854custom 54471126312970212044

Channel
@kkatarisha
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
99subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 9 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002343278839 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @kkatarisha |
| Created | Between 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 9 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/kkatarisha |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 9 Aug 2026, 11:16 | 99 | no change |
| 9 Aug 2026, 04:15 | 99 | first reading |
15 posts held, back to 19 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 15 (19 July 2026 – 7 August 2026) |
| Views total | 2,230 |
| Reactions total | 237 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 9 Aug 2026, 11:16 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 9 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
237 reactions across 15 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 39.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5447112631297021204 | 93 | 39.2% | |
| custom 5397780860273442685 | 70 | 29.5% | |
| custom 5229176911137100489 | 52 | 21.9% | |
| custom 5285103329565751193 | 22 | 9.28% |
Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 237reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 19 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
море
custom 522917691113710048911custom 53977808602734426854custom 54471126312970212044
попалось видео про тренд disgustingly educated но я не совсем считаю это проблемой или я может не совсем поняла есть различие между поверхностными знаниями в областях просто "ради знаний", а есть углубленное изучение тем и понимаю что иногда можно чувствовать себя глупым в окружении таких людей которые disgustingly educated но разве любопытство в сфере образования это плохо? разве само образование это плохо? мне наоб…
custom 54471126312970212047custom 53977808602734426855custom 52291769111371004894
и у меня с этой историей про идеальные картинки всё достаточно просто, потому что я лично знаю не одну и не две истории, что зачастую стоит за этими постами но вот с культом продуктивности и успешным успехом.... это прям очень сложно это тяжело видеть особенно в таком возрасте когда ты вроде бы еще ребенок, но уже взрослый и думаешь что если ты не добился до 25 лет того, чего добился рандомный человек ещё в 18 лет - …
custom 54471126312970212048custom 53977808602734426856custom 52291769111371004893
насколько скучно стало в интернете за последнее время все эти пустые идеальные картинки выглядят как целый однотипный продукт который ты потребляешь листая ленту из раза в раз у всех всё одно и тоже огромное количество контента с искусственным интеллектом который просто захватил почти все сферы заходя в профиль человека и видя его посты истории уже сложно отделить где он настоящий а где что-то ради просмотров и напис…
custom 539778086027344268511custom 52291769111371004894custom 54471126312970212042
Photo, posted without a caption
custom 54471126312970212048custom 52291769111371004895custom 53977808602734426855
https://on.soundcloud.com/YiAfLGxfx4KS8gussB dont forget where you come from weird russian kid такое настроение....
custom 54471126312970212045custom 52291769111371004892custom 53977808602734426852
не передать словами мою особую связь с этим фильмом
custom 52291769111371004899custom 53977808602734426852custom 54471126312970212041
сейчас начала читать вот что книга о том, почему мы видим искусство именно так, а не иначе авторы (каждый со своей точки зрения: искусствовед, психолог и философ) объясняют что наше восприятие зависит не только от картины или скульптуры, но и от работы мозга, нашего прошлого опыта, контекста и ожиданий
custom 54471126312970212048custom 52291769111371004895custom 53977808602734426855
у меня впереди еще один учебный год (слава богу последний), а мне всё ещё плохо от художественной литературы за эти 3 года... поэтому делюсь с вами своими планами на почитать! наслаждаюсь временем, когда могу читать то, что хочу буквально вчера дочитала книгу про модный дом шанель, мне безумно понравилось, выписала себе некоторые вещи и захотела пополнять коллекцию таких книжек а еще заметила за собой что мне прям оч…
custom 53977808602734426857custom 54471126312970212047custom 52291769111371004895
so me rn
custom 54471126312970212049custom 52291769111371004894custom 53977808602734426853
интересная и небольшая статья про поверхностные и глубокие знания очень люблю почитать что-то такое вечерами https://bigthink.com/smart-skills/how-to-understand-things/
custom 52851033295657511938custom 53977808602734426853custom 54471126312970212042
weird russian kid
custom 544711263129702120411custom 52851033295657511935custom 53977808602734426855
Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @kkatarisha. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 873,852 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“катариша” (@kkatarisha), 99 subscribers as measured 9 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/kkatarisha.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.