Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

ƙƙⓐ-m¡“🪬 [火]🩸

@kkami_solo

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry

18subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 10 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002389491941
TypeChannel
Username@kkami_solo
Description𝙬𝙝𝙤 𝙞𝙨 𝙝𝙚𝙧𝙚¿?.. https://t.me/archiveKamiii
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded11 August 2026
Last confirmed live11 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/kkami_solo

Growth

1810 August 2026 — 18 subscribers11 August 2026 — 18 subscribers10 August 202611 August 2026
2 measurements spanning 2 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 17–19 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
11 Aug 2026, 19:1618no change
10 Aug 2026, 05:3018first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 13 February 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 1 April 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos
225
Videos
50
Links
79

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

33 reactions across 4 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 15.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 5260615092491274674515.2%
custom 5332687641605318553515.2%
❤‍🔥515.2%
🐳515.2%
412.1%
custom 537969644950206089939.09%
custom 539788198527844908539.09%
🆒39.09%

Custom emoji. 4 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 4 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 33reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 13 February 2026 to 1 April 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

1 Apr 2026, 10:39 UTC27 views8 reactionsread 11 August 2026
File

🤩🥹 🔤𝐼𝑍𝑍𝑌 𝐸𝑁𝑇 🤩🤩 ᴀʟʟ ᴡᴇ ɴᴇᴇᴅ ɪs ʟᴏᴠᴇ, ᴅʀᴇᴀᴍs, ᴇɴᴅ.. 🐉 ・ 。゚☆ 𝙉𝙀𝙒 𝙀𝙍𝘼🌟 ✨ ✨ ʙʏ 𝐌𝐈𝐙𝐙𝐘 𝐄𝐍𝐓 :☆゚. 🩸 🤩𝘳𝘪𝘨𝘪𝘯𝘢𝘭: 𝐷𝐼𝑉𝐼𝑁𝐸 . ₊𖥔 𝑆𝑡𝑟𝑎𝑦 𝑘𝑖𝑑𝑠 🤩 ✨➿ ➿ ➿ ➿ ➿✨ 🐟孤独不是寂寞,而是与自己相处的时光。—海明威 #MIZZYENTERTAINMENT #missy #newera #china #wandering #米兹

❤‍🔥32🐳2🆒1

1 Apr 2026, 10:38 UTC24 views7 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Forwarded from @MIZZYENTEPhoto

🤩🥹🥹🔤𝐼𝑍𝑍𝑌 𝐸𝑁𝑇 🥹👍🤩🤩 🤩𝑂𝑖是一个出现在古代时代的公司🎤 🥹🥹🔤 𝑜𝑜𝑚𝑝𝑒𝑟𝑎𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛 ︴🤩🥹🥹 🤩 ﹏ // 🤍 🔤𝑎𝑡𝑒𝑛𝑡 🤩🥹🥹 🤩 🔤𝑢𝑟 𝐴𝑟𝑡𝑖𝑠𝑡𝑠 🪭🥹🥹 ꔛ🥹🎐🔤𝑜𝑜𝑠𝑡🤩✈️ 🎀🤩 🔤𝑛𝑘𝑒𝑡𝑎🕳🤐🤩⭐️ 🥹📤这就是你的能力吗? 申请,孩子🥹🥹 🤩🥹Become a star🥹🥹 >>>\\\ 你找到你的家了。 这是MIZZY娱乐🎏

2🐳2🆒2❤‍🔥1

8 Mar 2026, 06:52 UTC39 views9 reactionsread 11 August 2026

с 8 марта девчонки!!🌟

custom 52606150924912746743custom 53326876416053185532custom 53796964495020608992custom 53978819852784490852

8 Mar 2026, 06:49 UTC36 viewsread 11 August 2026
Forwarded from @inside_oiPhoto

ᅠ𐔌 ▭ b𐐼𝆬ყ‌𝘀 ᧉ‌ִntᧉ‌ִrȶׄᧉ‌ִinmᧉ‌ִnt 🎁 𓏸⃘𝅄 wᧉ‌ִ 𐐼𝆬ɾִe ⲙִ𐐼dᧉ‌ִ ꪮf ꞌꞋ 𝘀t𐐼𝆬ɾdꭎ‌ִ𝘀ȶׄ ׁ ॒ ִ ˖ 🐈‍⬛ ₊ ᨦ neᤐֹ‌ ρꪮ𝘀t ⇆ b𐐼𝆬ყ‌𝘀.ᧉ‌ִnt ꞌꞋ ᰋ ᅠᅠᅠ Мы объявляем открытым набор под крыло! 🎁 𓏸ׄ 𝅄𔓕 th𐐼𝆬nӄִׄ𝘀 fꪮɾִ ყ‌ꪮuɾִ 𐐼𝆬ttᧉ‌ִ𐓣‌ȶׄιꪮ𐓣‌ 🧸 𝅄 ִ ⬫ bꪮt : @BAYSAUD_BOT

8 Mar 2026, 06:48 UTC26 viewsread 11 August 2026
Forwarded from @inside_oiPhoto

ᅠᨦദ 𝅄 𝗔𝖡𝖮𝖴𝖳 𝗨𝖲 🎁 𝆺𝅥𝂅 𝅄 b𐐼𝆬ყ‌𝘀ᧉ‌ִnȶׄ ˖ ᶻ 🍄 wᧉ‌ִ 𐐼𝆬ɾִe ⲙִ𐐼dᧉ‌ִ ꪮf ꞌꞋ 𝘀t𐐼𝆬ɾdꭎ‌ִ𝘀ȶׄ ˖ ︦ ִִ۫𝆬 ➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿ ᚐ ⟡ 𝘀t𐐼𝆬rt : 𝟬𝟳.𝟬𝟯.𝟮𝟲 ꞌꞋ n𐐼𝆬ⲙִᧉ‌ִ : 𝘉𝘈𝘠𝘚 𝘌𝘕𝘛 👄 𝘉𝘈𝘠𝘚 — это компания в которой проходят наборы на группы, и разные деятельности такие как порты, журналисты, продюсеры и солисты

24 Feb 2026, 17:58 UTC22 viewsread 11 August 2026

☺️рочно ищем много сотрудничеств и вз!! 🌟 == 🌟 писать:: @g3rty_69 << 🤍

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @kkami_solo. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,389,523 of 1,480,688entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“ƙƙⓐ-m¡“🪬 [火]🩸” (@kkami_solo), 18 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/kkami_solo.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.