Channel
@kk_galimatya
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
53subscribers
+2 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002292459604 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @kk_galimatya |
| Created | Between 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 10 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 16 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 16 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/kk_galimatya |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 16 Aug 2026, 06:54 | 53 | +2 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 11:15 | 51 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 21:40 | 51 | first reading |
13 posts held, back to 11 November 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 5 of 6 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 13 (11 November 2025 – 5 August 2026) |
| Views total | 182 |
| Reactions total | 11 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 10 Aug 2026, 11:15 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
22 reactions across 10 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 68.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 15 | 68.2% | |
| 🔥 | 2 | 9.09% | |
| ✍ | 1 | 4.55% | |
| 😱 | 1 | 4.55% | |
| 🤓 | 1 | 4.55% | |
| 🤨 | 1 | 4.55% | |
| 🤩 | 1 | 4.55% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 13 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 22reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 13 most recent posts we hold, published 11 November 2025 to 5 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Особенности национального чаепития Время выпить чаю, как известно, всегда, а значит – самое время выпить чаю! Несомненным экспертом в этом вопросе стоит признать Вильяма Похлебкина, который описал рецепт создания превосходного чаю: Перво-наперво – вода – свежая, чистая, правильно вскипевшая, когда мелкие пузырьки только-только начинают подниматься от стенок чайника. Затем – чайник. Лучше всего подходит фарфор, способ…
❤2
Posted without readable text
❤1
Антиутопия из трех цифр «451 градус по Фаренгейту» можно считать «четвертой» в классической триаде антиутопий от Хаксли, Оруэлла и Замятина. Впрочем, пожалуй, она способна занять своё собственное место в литературном мире, как минимум, по причине сопряжения с фантастикой, которую можно обнаружить и в главном элементе мира «451 градуса» – сжигание любых печатных материалов (кроме рекламных листовок), на службу чему п…
❤3
#КК_События
ЧТО ЕЩЁ ВАС ЖДЁТ НА НАШЕМ ДВИЖЕ, ПОМИМО МУЗЫКИ: (жмите на спойлеры, там очень много всякого) 🛍 МАРКЕТ: 🎨 галерея Левая нога — арт-объекты и другие предметы искусства 🌟 Мастерская «Вновь» — минималистичные украшения (серьги, кольца, подвески) и функциональная керамика (посуда, подсвечники) 🤩 Авторский сувенир Сергея Демиденко — открытки, магниты, наклейки, постеры и другие сувениры ❤️ «Династия блеска / Shiny Dyna…
❤2
Alerta! Сайт изменил домен: https://kk-galimatya.com #КК_Объявления
❤2✍1
Ничего непонятно, но очень интересно Взгляните на абсолютную тьму полотна «Чёрного квадрата»… Казалось бы, что может быть тупее? Подобные картины способны генерировать двухлетние дети. А реплики Кандинского рождаются в процессе телефонного разговора при наличии ручки. В чём тогда смысл существования т. н. «современного искусства»? Подобным вопросом, пожалуй, задаётся любой человек на пути развития своих эстетических…
❤2🤨1
Вечный двигатель человечества Вечный двигатель – философский камень физической науки. Но что, если он существует на самом деле? Ответы на подобные, да и многие другие, вопросы, можно отыскать у Якова Перельмана (нет, не родственники). Впрочем, вопросы физической природы весьма конкретно обсуждаются в соответствующей книге – «Занимательная физика». Например, как довести бабушку до инфаркта трюком с зеркалом и «отру…
❤2🤓1
📕КНИЖНЫЙ📕 уже, можно сказать, очередной литклуб вместе с Книжным клубом Галиматья и теперь он будет посвящен стране восходящего солнца будем разбираться в тонкой японской душе через тексты Акутагавы («В чаще» и другие рассказы), Мисимы («Золотой храм») и Рю Мураками («69»), и возможно найдем ответ, почему японская литература внезапно стала популярна и любима во всём мире анонсируем заранее, чтобы все успели ознако…
❤1
КНИЖНЫЙ эксперимент прошел на ура, мы учли все нюансы с посадочными местами, и вместе с Книжным клубом Галиматья переходим из стана иностранной литературы в отечественную препарировать в этот раз будем русский постмодерн: что хочет найди Венедикт Ерофеев в Петушках, почему у Саши Соколова школа для дураков, и как так получилось, что творческий путь Пелевина начинается с мантры Омон Ра? об этом вы узнаете на нашей в…
КНИЖНЫЙ между рейвами и гигами многие из нас наверняка что‑то читают, и продолжая расширять своё творческое пространство, мы совместно с магазином Книжный клуб Галиматья, тестово заходим на территорию литературы на первый раз решили провести эксперимент и взять трех неформатных героев: поймали сбежавшего из дурки Филиппа Дика, вытянули за шкварник из кабака Чарльза Буковски и вызволили из хроно-синкластического инф…
🔥2🤩1
Лучшая обложка Филипа Дика
The shares total 228%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Showing the 12 most recent of 13 posts we hold for @kk_galimatya. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Лучшая обложка Филипа Дика
The shares total 228%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 13 most recent posts we hold, published 11 November 2025 to 5 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Книжный Клуб «Галиматья»” (@kk_galimatya), 53 subscribers as measured 16 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/kk_galimatya.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.