Channel
@kittyfoundtation
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
405subscribers
-1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002670623550 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @kittyfoundtation |
| Created | Between 1 March 2025 and 3 July 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 8 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| On Telegram | t.me/kittyfoundtation |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Aug 2026, 05:47 | 405 | no change |
| 8 Aug 2026, 02:53 | 405 | -1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 15:43 | 406 | first reading |
15 posts held, back to 3 July 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 29 July 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 15 (3 July 2025 – 29 July 2026) |
| Views total | 7 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 8 Aug 2026, 05:47 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
2 reactions across 1 post, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 2 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 1 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 3 July 2025 to 29 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
💬 «Всё, конец крипте» — именно так говорят сейчас все вокруг. А по факту всё наоборот. Госдума приняла закон о цифровых валютах. С 1 сентября 2026 они официально признаются имуществом — теперь их защищает закон. ❗️Что важно знать? (также собрали в карточках выше) • Крипта официально признана имуществом — её защищает закон. • Неквалифицированным инвесторам — покупка до 300 000 ₽ в год на лицензированных площадках. У…
Спрашивают, что использую в ресерче Заебал меня чуть Робингуд, хочется чутка подышать, там все равно ничего нового По факту ответ простой: > Берешь Hermes > Ставишь на сервак за 5$ > Подключаешь Codex за 100$/200$ > Подключаешь Grok через X подписку за 10$ Бинго, поздравляю, ты прекрасен. Если хочешь чуть больше глубины, то: > Подключаешь Tempo, кидаешь хотя бы 10$, чтобы можно было обращаться к Nansen > Идешь …
подписывайтесь: https://www.threads.net/@zhgun
10+ мемов на Робингуде с тезисами Ты заебешься разбираться в лоре всех щитков. Поэтому я сделал это за тебя - тут и просто мемчики с бэкграундом, и подкрепленные продуктом вещи 1. $CASHCAT ($190m) - такое кодовое название было у Робингуда до того, как он стал известным. Уже есть фьючи на Lighter, Aster, Hyperliquid. Главный раннер 2. $MARIAN ($3m) - вторая половинка Робина, но это неважно. Важно то, что это вообще…
Posted without readable text
https://youtu.be/jnO2xL2C5PQ?si=czfsgQ3tjuxVjD8v
Самое лучшее пособие по крайм-щиткам набирает обороты на просторах X. Парень разобрал крупнейшие последние кейсы и подготовил всю базу для того, чтобы находить следующие гемы с грязными пампами и наслаждаться иксами. Так что если хотите поймать следующий MYX, River или Pippin — мы организовали для вас быстренький перевод материала с ссылкой на оригинал. Вероятно, перечитать придется не раз и полазать самому, но эт…
🪣 Подборка полезных сервисов для Polymarket Сохраняйте тулзы, чтобы не потерять.
Кто рисует подарки, emoji и стикеры для Telegram? Список каналов Дисклеймер: не нужно писать авторам с вопросами в духе "когда подарки?" — вам не ответят. Никаких инсайдов не знают, может и вовсе не прочитают сообщение из-за отсутствия времени, относитесь ко всем с уважением. Авторы не работают в Telegram, а сотрудничают как фрилансеры Мы никак не участвуем в разработке NFT, кроме визуальной составляющей Подписатьс…
А кто-нибудь еще замечтал эту мани-принт схему на Aster, которая длится уже больше месяца? Очевидно, все это время кто-то там да фармил. Думаю на скучном рынке не стоит скипать такие кейсы, когда маркет-мейкеру тоже нечем заняться и он сходит с ума. Аналогичные паттерны на других жетонах пока не попадались, видимо это их локальная фишка, если бабки имеются — репутация не проблема. @True_Market_Vision
📊 CryptoDiffer: экосистема конфиденциальности Web3. Ключевые проекты и инфраструктура.
🔥2
#Cosmos #ATOM Coinbase наращивает стейкинг ATOM В Coinbase продолжают отправлять ATOM в стейкинг и тем самым увеличивают долю монет, которые участвуют в консенсусе. Bonded ratio (доля всех ATOM, которые застейканы) снова выше 59%. Чем выше показатель, тем: • сложнее атаковать сеть • выше общая безопасность • меньше ликвидных монет на рынке С точки зрения безопасности сети — это плюс. Coinbase уже контролирует…
Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @kittyfoundtation. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@kittyfoundtation named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“КотЯ Foundation” (@kittyfoundtation), 405 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/kittyfoundtation.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.