Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Kitten meowed 18+

@kitten_meowed

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

575subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003188849998
TypeChannel
Username@kitten_meowed
CreatedBetween 1 September 2025 and 30 November 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live8 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/kitten_meowed

Growth

5757 Aug 2026, 17:38 — 575 subscribers8 Aug 2026, 03:31 — 575 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 17:388 Aug 2026, 03:31
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 574–576 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
8 Aug 2026, 03:31575no change
7 Aug 2026, 17:38575first reading

Engagement

8 posts held, back to 23 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
116.4%
avg views ÷ 575 subscribers
Avg views / post
670
8 posts measured
Reaction rate
8.23%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
8
of 8 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 4 August 2026
Posts held8 (23 July 20264 August 2026)
Views total5,356
Reactions total441
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Aug 2026, 03:31 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
145
Videos
29
Links
40

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
4m 17s
Average length
2m 09s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

441 reactions across 8 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 34.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 534838845719655925715134.2%
custom 535966530614906885014232.2%
custom 534582620855678701211425.9%
custom 5305243131296363173255.67%
custom 530300417343489405092.04%

Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 8 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 441reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 8 most recent posts we hold, published 23 July 2026 to 4 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

4 Aug 2026, 08:44 UTC323 views58 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

Прислали небольшое видео. Оля конечно красотка в этом костюме 😍 Bd: Леонокра

custom 534838845719655925731custom 535966530614906885016custom 534582620855678701211

3 Aug 2026, 14:02 UTC375 views30 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Я дома! Очень насыщенная эмоциями выдалась поездка. Без Вани нашего маленького, уютного лагеря не случилось бы, как и многого другого, о чем я вам не расскажу. За что ему огромное спасибо. 💜 А позже, надеюсь, будут фотографии выступления с Леонокрой.

custom 534838845719655925713custom 534582620855678701212custom 53596653061490688505

31 Jul 2026, 02:40 UTC563 views36 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Уехала на Ладогу до понедельника 💜

custom 534838845719655925723custom 534582620855678701213

27 Jul 2026, 05:17 UTC≈1,240 views78 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Фотографии тоже вроде ничего получились. 💜 Bd: Леонокра Ph: Усаги

custom 534838845719655925738custom 534582620855678701224custom 530524313129636317310custom 53596653061490688506

26 Jul 2026, 18:08 UTC737 views16 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Почему ставите реакции с охреневющим котиком? Напишите хоть что-то в комментарии! И вообще, мы с Олей очень ждем больше лайков. 😶

custom 535966530614906885015custom 53030041734348940501

26 Jul 2026, 18:01 UTC683 views112 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

Вчера было жарко. 😊 В последнее время меня очень увлекает пет плей. Правда, в образе собаки вижу себя больше, чем в образе кошки. Вон как радуюсь что палку в зубах подержать дали. XD Bd: Леонокра 💜

custom 535966530614906885053custom 534838845719655925726custom 534582620855678701219custom 530524313129636317313custom 53030041734348940501

24 Jul 2026, 17:56 UTC682 views61 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

И вторая часть. Первая все же остается моей любимой. Ставьте 😍, если вам тоже больше нравится первая и 🔪 если больше нравится вторая.) Bd: Musicf1sh Ph: Tanya Kablukova

custom 535966530614906885032custom 534582620855678701211custom 534838845719655925711custom 53030041734348940507

23 Jul 2026, 12:16 UTC753 views50 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Сегодня покажу вам первую часть моих любимых на сегодняшних день фотографий. Смотрю, и до сих пор внутри все сжимается. Bd: Musicf1sh Ph: Tanya Kablukova

custom 534582620855678701224custom 535966530614906885015custom 53483884571965592579custom 53052431312963631732

Showing the 8 most recent of 8 posts we hold for @kitten_meowed. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 134,904 of 1,480,688entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Kitten meowed 18+” (@kitten_meowed), 575 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/kitten_meowed.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.