๐คฉ ะกัะฐะฒั โค๏ธ ะตัะปะธ.. ััะพ ะผัโ๏ธ ๐คฉ
โค2

Channel
@kittanerinfo
On this record: Growth ยท Engagement ยท What this channel posts ยท Reactions ยท Posts ยท Polls ยท Citations ยท Cite this entry
4subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 12 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register ยท movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1004489501111 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @kittanerinfo |
| Created | 11 August 2026 โ measured โ dated from the channelโs first post |
| First recorded | 13 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/kittanerinfo |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Aug 2026, 06:03 | 4 | no change |
| 12 Aug 2026, 14:46 | 4 | first reading |
17 posts held, back to 11 August 2026 โ the reader has not yet reached the start of this channelโs public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegramโs post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) รท viewsโ note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegramโs public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 1 of 12 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days ยท latest post in window 12 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 17 (11 August 2026 โ 12 August 2026) |
| Views total | 104 |
| Reactions total | 2 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface โ not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 13 Aug 2026, 06:03 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than โcorrectingโ the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form โ 8.12K, 3.7M โ so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded โ read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegramโs own channel header, read 13 August 2026 โ not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegramโs rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
2 reactions across 1 post, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| โค | 2 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities โ ๐ is thanks in one channel and mourning in another โ so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one โ 4.34K, 1.2M โ so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 1 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegramโs own count on each post โ not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above โ those same posts carry 2reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by โa reaction total printed elsewhere on the pageโ.
Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 11 August 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
๐คฉ ะกัะฐะฒั โค๏ธ ะตัะปะธ.. ััะพ ะผัโ๏ธ ๐คฉ
โค2
๐
๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐ Opinion - https://t.me/lomkaukikisser/65 ๐คฉ๐คฉ๐คฉ๐คฉ๐๐๐
๐ ๐
๐๐๐๐๐๐๐ :: ๐ณ๐๐พ ๐ฟ๐๐พ๐บ๐ ๐ผ๐๐๐ผ๐๐ ๐ณ๐๐พ ๐บ๐๐บ๐๐๐๐ ๐ฝ๐๐๐๐๐บ๐ ๐ผ๐๐๐ผ๐๐ ๐ญ๐พ๐๐๐๐บ๐๐บ ๐ง๐บ๐๐๐๐๐พ ๐๐๐๐: ๐ข๐๐ ๐๐๐ฟ๐๐ ๐ ๐๐๐บ๐๐พ (๐๐พ๐๐บ๐) ๐ข๐๐๐๐๐พ ๐ฑ๐๐ ๐ช๐๐๐๐ฝ๐๐ ๐ง๐๐๐๐พ ๐๐ฟ ๐๐๐๐ ะะะะข ๐ฅ๐๐๐๐บ๐๐พ๐ ๐ฃ๐บ๐๐ฝ๐'๐ ๐๐๐๐ ๐ฝ ๐ฏ๐๐๐๐ ๐๐ ๐บ๐ ๐๐๐๐พ ๐ฑ๐พ๐๐๐พ๐๐พ๐๐บ๐๐๐ ๐ฒ๐๐ ๐บ๐ ๐ป๐บ๐ ๐ ๐บ ๐ฅ๐๐๐พ ๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐ ๐ฟ๐๐พ๐ฝ๐ฝ๐ ๐ต๐๐ผ๐บ๐ ๐๐๐ฝ๐ ๐ง๐พ๐ ๐ ๐๐๐บ ๐ก๐๐ ๐ฃ๐๐๐๐พ๐๐ ๐๐๐๐ฝ๐พ๐ ๐ฃ๐๐๐ ๐ฝ๐๐๐ ๐ ๐๐๐พ๐๐บ๐๐๐๐พ ๐ผ๐ ๐๐ป ๐ฅ๐๐๐ฝ๐บ๐ ๐ญ๐๐๐๐ ๐ฅ๐๐๐๐๐ ๐ซ๐บ๐ผ๐พ๐'๐ ๐ถ๐บ๐๐ฝ๐๐๐ป๐พ ๐ณ๐๐๐ ๐ก๐๐๐๐ ๐ฃ๐๐ ๐ ๐'๐ ๐ฅ๐บ๐ผ๐๐๐๐ ๐ฏ๐๐๐๐๐ผ๐๐๐๐พ๐ ๐ค๐๐บ ๐ค๐ญ๐ : ๐ฃ๐๐พ๐บ๐ ๐ป๐ป๐ ๐ญ๐, ๐'๐ ๐๐๐ ๐บ ๐๐๐๐บ๐ ๐ง๐๐๐๐บ๐: ๐๐๐บ๐ ๐โฆ
๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐
๐๐ฉ๐ฐ ๐ข๐ณ๐ฆ ๐บ๐ฐ๐ถ ๐
The shares total 199%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐
๐๐๐๐๐๐๐'๐ ๐๐๐๐๐ ๐'๐ ๐๐๐๐๐ @kittaart - ๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐ https://t.me/+OHau4MBtgyBmMWE0 - ๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐ http://t.me/CTAKAHCHANNEL https://t.me/pinkipaii0 https://t.me/povidonedaily : https://t.me/+8lXTxfcR3HE5MGJk
๐๐ช๐ต๐ต๐ข๐ฏ๐บ๐ข๐ฏ ๐ช๐ฏ๐ง๐ฐ ! ( ๊๊ณ๊) pinned a photo
# ๐ต๐ฆ๐ฏ๐ฆ๐ช๐ฌ๐ฐ ๐ค๐ฉ๐ข๐ฏ ๐ ๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐ ๐ ๐๐๐ ๐๐ฏ๐ช ; ๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐ | ๐๐บ ๐ฉ๐ข๐ต๐ฆ๐ณ๐ด ๐
๐
Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @kittanerinfo. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked โ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it โ t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so โ1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A pollโs figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
๐๐ฉ๐ฐ ๐ข๐ณ๐ฆ ๐บ๐ฐ๐ถ ๐
The shares total 199%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only โ there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each optionโs share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each optionโs own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 11 August 2026 to 12 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind โ an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results โ and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank โ 738,930 of 1,480,944entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below โ republished posts weigh more than named mentions โ and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channelโs name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page โ a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel โ every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched โ that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting todayโs namer to yesterdayโs owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason โ naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides โ the โNamed by N registered channelsโ figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 โ this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
โ๐๐ช๐ต๐ต๐ข๐ฏ๐บ๐ข๐ฏ ๐ช๐ฏ๐ง๐ฐ ! ( ๊๊ณ๊)โ (@kittanerinfo), 4 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/kittanerinfo.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV ยท JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.