Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 北宇治高校図書館

Channel

北宇治高校図書館

@kitauji_toshokan

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Cite this entry

239subscribers

+5 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001411105722
TypeChannel
Username@kitauji_toshokan
CreatedBetween 1 April 2019 and 15 March 2020 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live9 October 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged3 times, most recently 9 October 2026
On Telegramt.me/kitauji_toshokan

Topic

Gaming — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 23 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 97% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

234239236.57 August 2026 — 234 subscribers8 August 2026 — 234 subscribers14 August 2026 — 236 subscribers14 September 2026 — 239 subscribers7 August 202614 September 2026
4 measurements spanning 38 days, net +5. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 233–240 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Sept 2026, 18:55239+3
14 Aug 2026, 22:44236+2
8 Aug 2026, 10:03234no change
7 Aug 2026, 21:40234first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 15 March 2020 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 26 June 2024. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

16 reactions across 2 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 87.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍1487.5%
❤16.25%
🤗16.25%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 4 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 16 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 15 March 2020 to 26 June 2024, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

26 Jun 2024, 01:26 UTC≈1,230 views8 reactionsread 8 August 2026

https://febri.jp/topics/anime-eupho3_kurosawatomoyo_01/ 黑泽朋世今天的这篇采访提到不少她对角色的看法,比如和真由只是相遇的时间比较糟糕,最终可能还是会成为好朋友,还畅想了成为社会人的黄与黑会在一起喝酒吐槽以前旧事的情景。 对丽奈则是认为从第9集桥上的争吵(部长失格)开始,两人就开始走向了不同的道路,久美子是从学生走向大人,丽奈是从学生走向职业奏者。同时表示虽然在第11集爱的抱抱后也对丽奈说了“特别”,但对久美子来说,在第9集的桥上时,“特别”的时期就已经结束了,后面更像是在安慰丽奈。 在提到以前采访说过丽奈像“一个麻烦的女友”时,又说这次就像两人在同居着,久美子决定分手,但因为房租还有6个月,所以直到最后2个月之前久美子都不会开口(先变心的是久美子) 后面说丽奈其实一直都没变,从始至终贯彻如一,变的是久美子。久美子开始意识到她和丽奈“特别”的关系是一种“相互依赖”的…

👍7❤1

12 Jul 2022, 10:24 UTC≈1,800 views8 reactionsread 8 August 2026
File

千夏字幕组 录音台本注释版 简繁字幕 source

👍7🤗1

26 Mar 2021, 11:56 UTC≈2,320 views0 reactionsread 8 August 2026

#座谈会 #山田尚子 #藤田春香 监督座谈会②:山田尚子 × 藤田春香

26 Mar 2021, 11:56 UTC≈2,050 views0 reactionsread 8 August 2026

#座谈会 #石原立也 #石立太一 #小川太一 监督座谈会①:石原立也 × 石立太一 × 小川太一

24 Jan 2021, 15:11 UTC≈1,660 viewsread 8 August 2026

#石原立也 五周年纪念Disc发售纪念——石原立也监督采访

5 Jul 2020, 18:20 UTC≈1,700 viewsread 8 August 2026

#山田尚子 #西屋太志 #高桥博行 「私たちは、いま!!全集2019」 作品回顾 《利兹与青鸟》 Interview 1 山田尚子×西屋太志×高桥博行

3 Jul 2020, 17:02 UTC≈1,240 viewsread 8 August 2026

#山田尚子 #藤田春香 《私たちは、いま!!全集2019》 监督座谈会 山田尚子×藤田春香

7 Jun 2020, 19:30 UTC≈1,170 viewsread 8 August 2026

#石原立也 《吹响!上低音号~誓言的终章~》石原立也的制作笔记

25 May 2020, 14:44 UTC≈1,050 viewsread 8 August 2026

#访谈 #藤村鼓乃美 #山冈百合 #津田健次郎 #小堀幸 #石谷春贵 「剧场版 吹响!上低音号 ~誓言的终章~」 公式书采访 #2 (其他老部员篇)

25 May 2020, 14:43 UTC865 viewsread 8 August 2026

#访谈 #雨宫天 #七濑彩夏 #久野美咲 #土屋神叶 「剧场版 吹响!上低音号 ~誓言的终章~」 公式书采访 #1 (新部员篇)

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @kitauji_toshokan. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“北宇治高校図書館” (@kitauji_toshokan), 239 subscribers as measured 14 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/kitauji_toshokan.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.