Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for ݃ ࿙⁠⁠⁠⁠‌፝֟࿚ֵ۫ 𝓀𝗂𝗍𑣿⁠⁠⁠‌⃔𝗄𝖺𝗐𝖺 ᛝᩧ 𝖽𝖺𝗂𝗅𝗒 𝖼𝖿 ‌۫۫ 𖹭ׂ ᩨ‌ ׅ

Channel

݃ ࿙⁠⁠⁠⁠‌፝֟࿚ֵ۫ 𝓀𝗂𝗍𑣿⁠⁠⁠‌⃔𝗄𝖺𝗐𝖺 ᛝᩧ 𝖽𝖺𝗂𝗅𝗒 𝖼𝖿 ‌۫۫ 𖹭ׂ ᩨ‌ ׅ

@kitakawacff

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

60subscribers

-1 since we began measuring on 9 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003512994068
TypeChannel
Username@kitakawacff
CreatedBetween 1 December 2025 and 20 January 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded10 August 2026
Last confirmed live25 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 25 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/kitakawacff

Growth

606160.59 August 2026 — 61 subscribers10 August 2026 — 61 subscribers25 August 2026 — 60 subscribers9 August 202625 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 16 days, net -1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 60–61 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
25 Aug 2026, 09:3360-1
10 Aug 2026, 04:4661no change
9 Aug 2026, 18:1761first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 20 January 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 24 January 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
53s
Average length
13s

Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

149 reactions across 8 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 17.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 54090303373993926662617.4%
custom 52152401674633475412516.8%
custom 52153939573573202141711.4%
custom 53977277143481350361711.4%
custom 52491959856319997481610.7%
custom 54408916889963450301510.1%
custom 5271907652434163840138.72%
💘117.38%
custom 544055504086975090896.04%

Custom emoji. 8 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 149reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 20 January 2026 to 24 January 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

24 Jan 2026, 20:16 UTC305 viewsread 10 August 2026
Photo

🍬✖️🍬❤️ 𖹭ׂׂ ִ ִ 🤩𝖾𝗐 𝓹𝗈𝗌𝗍 😔 ִ ִ ✖️✖️ 🍭🤩❤️😳🩶🩶𖹭 🤩 🕯

24 Jan 2026, 20:16 UTC299 viewsread 10 August 2026
Video

🍬✖️🍬❤️ 𖹭ׂׂ ִ ִ 🤩𝖾𝗐 𝓹𝗈𝗌𝗍 😔 ִ ִ ✖️✖️ 🍭🤩❤️😳🩶🩶𖹭 🤩 🕯 ✖️✖️✖️ 𝓬𝓻 ﹫𝗅𝖺𝗂𝗇𝟦𝗇𝖺𝗏𝗂 𝓸𝓷 𝗍𝗂𝗄 𝗍𝗈𝗄

24 Jan 2026, 20:15 UTC255 viewsread 10 August 2026
Photo

🍬✖️🍬❤️ 𖹭ׂׂ ִ ִ 🤩𝖾𝗐 𝓹𝗈𝗌𝗍 😔 ִ ִ ✖️✖️ 🍭🤩❤️😳🩶🩶𖹭 🤩 🕯

24 Jan 2026, 20:14 UTC215 viewsread 10 August 2026
Video

🍬✖️🍬❤️ 𖹭ׂׂ ִ ִ 🤩𝖾𝗐 𝓹𝗈𝗌𝗍 😔 ִ ִ ✖️✖️ 🍭🤩❤️😳🩶🩶𖹭 🤩 🕯 ✖️✖️✖️ 𝓬𝓻 ﹫𝗅𝖺𝗂𝗇𝟦𝗇𝖺𝗏𝗂 𝓸𝓷 𝗍𝗂𝗄 𝗍𝗈𝗄

24 Jan 2026, 20:10 UTC196 viewsread 10 August 2026
Photo

🍬✖️🍬❤️ 𖹭ׂׂ ִ ִ 🤩𝖾𝗐 𝓹𝗈𝗌𝗍 😔 ִ ִ ✖️✖️ 🍭🤩❤️😳🩶🩶𖹭 🤩 🕯

23 Jan 2026, 14:12 UTC203 viewsread 10 August 2026
Photo

🍬✖️🍬❤️ 𖹭ׂׂ ִ ִ 🤩𝖾𝗐 𝓹𝗈𝗌𝗍 😔 ִ ִ ✖️✖️ 🍭🤩❤️😳🩶🩶𖹭 🤩 🕯

23 Jan 2026, 14:11 UTC196 viewsread 10 August 2026
Photo

🍬✖️🍬❤️ 𖹭ׂׂ ִ ִ 🤩𝖾𝗐 𝓹𝗈𝗌𝗍 😔 ִ ִ ✖️✖️ 🍭🤩❤️😳🩶🩶𖹭 🤩 🕯

23 Jan 2026, 14:11 UTC195 viewsread 10 August 2026
Photo

🍬✖️🍬❤️ 𖹭ׂׂ ִ ִ 🤩𝖾𝗐 𝓹𝗈𝗌𝗍 😔 ִ ִ ✖️✖️ 🍭🤩❤️😳🩶🩶𖹭 🤩 🕯

23 Jan 2026, 14:11 UTC186 viewsread 10 August 2026
Photo

🍬✖️🍬❤️ 𖹭ׂׂ ִ ִ 🤩𝖾𝗐 𝓹𝗈𝗌𝗍 😔 ִ ִ ✖️✖️ 🍭🤩❤️😳🩶🩶𖹭 🤩 🕯

23 Jan 2026, 09:10 UTC185 viewsread 10 August 2026
Photo

۟. ʿ ꕀ✨️⚫️тдн 🔤f&🔤aily . . . 𝇄𝇃🎁 ищите контент с давней игрой у нас есть shutdown ??? 🤢 решение для тибя!

22 Jan 2026, 08:16 UTC202 views9 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

🍬✖️🍬❤️ 𖹭ׂׂ ִ ִ 🤩𝖾𝗐 𝓹𝗈𝗌𝗍 😔 ִ ִ ✖️✖️ 🍭🤩❤️😳🩶🩶𖹭 🤩 🕯

custom 53977277143481350364custom 54090303373993926663custom 52152401674633475412

22 Jan 2026, 08:15 UTC192 views11 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

🍬✖️🍬❤️ 𖹭ׂׂ ִ ִ 🤩𝖾𝗐 𝓹𝗈𝗌𝗍 😔 ִ ִ ✖️✖️ 🍭🤩❤️😳🩶🩶𖹭 🤩 🕯

custom 54090303373993926665custom 54405550408697509083custom 54408916889963450303

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @kitakawacff. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 482,828 of 1,627,445entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 25 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“݃ ࿙⁠⁠⁠⁠‌፝֟࿚ֵ۫ 𝓀𝗂𝗍𑣿⁠⁠⁠‌⃔𝗄𝖺𝗐𝖺 ᛝᩧ 𝖽𝖺𝗂𝗅𝗒 𝖼𝖿 ‌۫۫ 𖹭ׂ ᩨ‌ ׅ” (@kitakawacff), 60 subscribers as measured 25 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/kitakawacff.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.