Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

kit, ti cosplay mav¿

@kit_cosplay

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

141subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001809696162
TypeChannel
Username@kit_cosplay
DescriptionХэй народ! Я Кит – косплеер из Москвы. Косплею персонажей из bungou stray dogs, yandere simulator и alien stage)) Заходите к нам на чаек🍵 всем рада!^^ Тик ток–@kit_ti_cosplay_mav Личный тгк –https://t.me/alisa_voice Тгк с Энджи–https://t.me/Soukoku_OO
CreatedBetween 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live8 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/kit_cosplay

Growth

1417 Aug 2026, 19:04 — 141 subscribers8 Aug 2026, 22:16 — 141 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 19:048 Aug 2026, 22:16
2 measurements spanning 1 day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 140–142 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
8 Aug 2026, 22:16141no change
7 Aug 2026, 19:04141first reading

Engagement

5 posts held, back to 8 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
4.40%
avg views ÷ 141 subscribers
Avg views / post
6.2
5 posts measured
Reaction rate
85.7%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
5
of 5 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 1 of 5 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 August 2026
Posts held5 (8 August 20268 August 2026)
Views total31
Reactions total6
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Aug 2026, 22:16 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
2,910
Videos
1,540
Links
430

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
37s
Average length
19s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

6 reactions across 1 post, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 33.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
233.3%
❤‍🔥233.3%
💘233.3%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 1 of the 5 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 6reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 5 most recent posts we hold, published 8 August 2026 to 8 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

8 Aug 2026, 07:42 UTC6 viewsread 8 August 2026
Photo

✿Adept Xiao✿ — «Я никогда не сочинял стихов, как я могу судить о поэзии? И потом, вы хорошо знаете, что с моей кармой я должен держаться подальше от шумных сборищ.» Рт/мью/комментарии/реакции Мой ТГК #Xiao #Genshin

8 Aug 2026, 07:42 UTC8 viewsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @The_blessing_of_tfe_celectialsPhoto

🤩🥀🥀 🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀 🤩🌸🌸🌸🌸 🌸🌸🌸🌸🌸🌸 🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩 🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩 💗: «Я всегда надеваю ту улыбку, которая больше всего понравится людям. Я… соткана изо лжи» 🌟🌟 💗: «Я буду использовать любые средства, чтобы добиться справедливости!» 🌟🌟 🩵: «Для меня актёрская игра — не более чем средство для достижения цели» 💿💿💿💿 🤩💿💿💿💿 💿💿💿 Фотограф Аква Хошино Ай Хошино #РубиХошино #АкваХошино #АйХошино #Фотос #ЗвездноеДитя Рт, реакции, комм

8 Aug 2026, 07:42 UTC7 views6 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @AlternativeAlterEgoPhoto

🌹🅰️✨🅰️🅰️🤩 (Shunkashuutou version) 🤩𝚃𝚜𝚞𝚒𝚘𝚔𝚞 wo mune ni daki mawari tsuzukeru 𝚜𝚝𝚘𝚛𝚢 Tada 𝚗𝚎𝚐𝚊𝚞 no wa hitotsu 𝚍𝚊𝚔𝚎 You had to be in 𝚏𝚘𝚛𝚝𝚞𝚗𝚎 𝚃𝚑𝚎𝚛𝚎 is no mean to live... Without 𝚢𝚘𝚞🌟 Nemuri 𝚝𝚜𝚞𝚣𝚞𝚔𝚎𝚛𝚞 🎃Tokete yuku yuki no 𝚐𝚎𝚗𝚜𝚘𝚞 okizari no 𝚢𝚊𝚔𝚞𝚜𝚘𝚔𝚞 Ima wa 𝚒𝚖𝚊 wa mou nani mo 𝚖𝚒𝚎𝚗𝚊𝚒 𝚄𝚖𝚊𝚛𝚎 horobi yuku hoshi no you ni 𝚊𝚗𝚊𝚝𝚊 wa 𝙺𝚒𝚝𝚜𝚞𝚖𝚒 no toki wo doko e 𝚢𝚞𝚔𝚞 no 𝚃𝚜𝚞𝚒𝚘𝚔𝚞 wo mune ni daki mawari 𝚝𝚜𝚞𝚣𝚞𝚔𝚎𝚛𝚞 story🍓 𝚃𝚊𝚍𝚊 negau no wa h

2❤‍🔥2💘2

8 Aug 2026, 07:42 UTC4 viewsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @sanechka_cospPhoto

˓˓ 🤩льфедов ׄ ୨୧ and 🤩екби 🌟 ➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿ —🌟Именем закона тебе, Алфёдов, назначается самое суровое наказание!». — 🌟«Правда? И что за наказание?» Рт, реакции, комментарии?? ➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿ ᅠ ִ ︶︶ ◟ 🤩 ◞ ⠀ ︶ִ︶ ︶ ⠀

8 Aug 2026, 07:42 UTC6 viewsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @cherryfree2005Photo

🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩 🤩🅰️🅰️🅰️🅰️🅰️🤩 🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩 Иногда мне кажется ..Вот если бы Борт не было ..Понимаешь? Просто мысли! Хотя, я очень люблю её ..Так ведь нельзя, да? 🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩 ✨🤩🤩

Showing the 5 most recent of 5 posts we hold for @kit_cosplay. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 156,268 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“kit, ti cosplay mav¿” (@kit_cosplay), 141 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/kit_cosplay.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.