Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for kIrIEshka (ПЕРЕЕЗД)

Channel

kIrIEshka (ПЕРЕЕЗД)

@kirieshkiiiiiiii

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

134subscribers

-10 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003618595130
TypeChannel
Username@kirieshkiiiiiiii
CreatedBetween 1 December 2025 and 31 March 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live16 September 2026
Measurements held7
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 16 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/kirieshkiiiiiiii

Growth

1341441397 August 2026 — 144 subscribers8 August 2026 — 144 subscribers15 August 2026 — 140 subscribers23 August 2026 — 139 subscribers31 August 2026 — 137 subscribers8 September 2026 — 136 subscribers16 September 2026 — 134 subscribers7 August 202616 September 2026
7 measurements spanning 40 days, net -10. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 133–146 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
16 Sept 2026, 12:56134-2
8 Sept 2026, 17:40136-1
31 Aug 2026, 04:49137-2
23 Aug 2026, 17:05139-1
15 Aug 2026, 20:12140-4
8 Aug 2026, 21:31144no change
7 Aug 2026, 16:04144first reading

Engagement

17 posts held, back to 31 March 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 17 posts for this entry, the most recent from 4 April 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

176 reactions across 13 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 19.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 52740979182513891273519.9%
custom 52109199930042942233117.6%
custom 54408762228190993762614.8%
custom 52064442075851204982011.4%
custom 52670175100451072892011.4%
custom 5260705007631622521158.52%
custom 5251270424771198494116.25%
custom 5258252976442607617105.68%
custom 543857244101623492184.55%

Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 176 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 31 March 2026 to 4 April 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

4 Apr 2026, 13:29 UTC625 viewsread 8 August 2026

минуту внимания ! ! как вы знаете, причина, по которой мы оставались с Родо за главных в этом канале — уход Венты. я уже говорила о том, что не могу гарантировать её возвращения, так как это было ее решение, связанное с личными переживаниями и проблемами. но все в жизни меняется, и часто в лучшую сторону. поэтому я с радостью хочу объявить: 🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟 🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟⚪️ с новыми силами она будет развивать события уже ново

Signed ℓℓυмιηα

3 Apr 2026, 20:27 UTC307 views10 reactionsread 8 August 2026

ПРОГРЕВ ПРОГРЕВ 🌟🌟⚫️

custom 525127042477119849410

Signed ᵈᵃᵐⁿ ˢʰᵉᐟʰᵉʳ ᵖʰᵒᵇᵒˢ ˡᵒᵛᵉʳ

3 Apr 2026, 20:26 UTC294 views17 reactionsread 8 August 2026

У МЕНЯ ДЛЯ ВАС ХОРОШИЕ НОВОСТИ, РОДНЫЕ 🌟🌟⚫️

custom 52109199930042942238custom 52582529764426076174custom 52064442075851204982custom 52670175100451072891custom 52740979182513891271custom 54408762228190993761

Signed ᵈᵃᵐⁿ ˢʰᵉᐟʰᵉʳ ᵖʰᵒᵇᵒˢ ˡᵒᵛᵉʳ

3 Apr 2026, 16:17 UTC294 views5 reactionsread 8 August 2026

🌟🌟⚫️

custom 52740979182513891275

Signed ᵈᵃᵐⁿ ˢʰᵉᐟʰᵉʳ ᵖʰᵒᵇᵒˢ ˡᵒᵛᵉʳ

3 Apr 2026, 16:16 UTC244 views4 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @tGoK_tPhoto

#info_zp ОТКРЫВАЮ КОММИШКИ НЕ РИСУЮ: НСФВ, ГУРО, ПАРАФИЛИИ обращаться в лс @rhododendron_ferrugineum

custom 52740979182513891274

Signed ᵈᵃᵐⁿ ˢʰᵉᐟʰᵉʳ ᵖʰᵒᵇᵒˢ ˡᵒᵛᵉʳ

3 Apr 2026, 04:42 UTC260 views5 reactionsread 8 August 2026

добейте до 100 по приколу 🌟🌟⚫️

custom 52740979182513891275

Signed ᵈᵃᵐⁿ ˢʰᵉᐟʰᵉʳ ᵖʰᵒᵇᵒˢ ˡᵒᵛᵉʳ

2 Apr 2026, 12:17 UTC267 views6 reactionsread 8 August 2026

я съебую в свой достаточно старый тгк @tGoK_t всем спасибо, что были рядом меня все равно тут не особо любят 🌟🌟⚫️

custom 52607050076316225216

Signed ᵈᵃᵐⁿ ˢʰᵉᐟʰᵉʳ ᵖʰᵒᵇᵒˢ ˡᵒᵛᵉʳ

2 Apr 2026, 12:14 UTC259 views0 reactionsread 8 August 2026

короче да, я переселяюсь в свой канал чтобы серить уже там https://t.me/IIV0IDII я уже ща выложу туда фуллрост арты — 🌑 —

Signed ℓℓυмιηα

1 Apr 2026, 21:04 UTC246 views21 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

или нет блять кто в тарелку накончал — 🌑 —

custom 544087622281909937613custom 52109199930042942234custom 54385724410162349213custom 52512704247711984941

Signed ℓℓυмιηα

1 Apr 2026, 21:00 UTC227 viewsread 8 August 2026

шутки кончились (( — 🌑 —

Signed ℓℓυмιηα

1 Apr 2026, 20:50 UTC227 views28 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

— 🌑 —

custom 520644420758512049814custom 52109199930042942235custom 52740979182513891275custom 52607050076316225212custom 54385724410162349211custom 54408762228190993761

Signed ℓℓυмιηα

Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @kirieshkiiiiiiii. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“kIrIEshka (ПЕРЕЕЗД)” (@kirieshkiiiiiiii), 134 subscribers as measured 16 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/kirieshkiiiiiiii.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.