Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Kiraboshi /// Упорядоченный хаос

Channel

Kiraboshi /// Упорядоченный хаос

@kiraboshi_chaotic

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

136subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002225536842
TypeChannel
Username@kiraboshi_chaotic
Description°˖✧◝(⁰▿⁰)◜✧˖°
CreatedBetween 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live15 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/kiraboshi_chaotic

Growth

1368 Aug 2026, 05:31 — 136 subscribers8 Aug 2026, 23:31 — 136 subscribers8 Aug 2026, 05:318 Aug 2026, 23:31
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 135–137 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
8 Aug 2026, 23:31136no change
8 Aug 2026, 05:31136first reading

Engagement

13 posts held, back to 4 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
45.3%
avg views ÷ 136 subscribers
Avg views / post
61.6
13 posts measured
Reaction rate
19.4%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
13
of 13 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 August 2026
Posts held13 (4 August 20268 August 2026)
Views total801
Reactions total155
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Aug 2026, 23:31 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
1,550
Videos
139
Links
78

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
2m 11s
Average length
44s

Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

155 reactions across 13 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 42.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
6642.6%
custom 52381202614080053653321.3%
custom 52737627561834798723019.4%
custom 5413596660729139338159.68%
custom 528277107212970941363.87%
😁53.23%

Custom emoji. 4 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 13 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 155reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 13 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 8 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

8 Aug 2026, 13:15 UTC42 views14 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Ладно, чисто теоретически нам бы пригодился человек, который умеет грести на лодке...

6custom 52737627561834798725custom 52381202614080053653

8 Aug 2026, 12:54 UTC46 views12 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Искренне считаю, что я и Марина это самые рандомные люди... Которые чисто А ГО ЗАВТРА И вот мы планируем приключения на наши асс Настоящее "угадай че выкину"

custom 528277107212970941364custom 52737627561834798722

7 Aug 2026, 20:46 UTC59 views5 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Это они не знают какие у нас открытки в тираже👀

5

7 Aug 2026, 20:20 UTC59 views4 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

Пока ехала домой попался ролик

4

7 Aug 2026, 19:48 UTC59 views12 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

У меня за отпуск просто куча рандомных фоток. Типо за сегодня только огоньки...вчера шиповник 🫣

5custom 54135966607291393385custom 52381202614080053652

6 Aug 2026, 21:12 UTC64 views12 reactionsread 8 August 2026

А еще очень жду влог Свезки, какая прелесть просто

5custom 52737627561834798724custom 52381202614080053653

6 Aug 2026, 21:12 UTC60 views16 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @svezkkaVideo

Пока монтирую большой VLOG для YouTube (он выйдет в воскресенье), вот вам небольшой вертикальный влог 😝 ВСЕМ СМОТРЕТЬ!

6custom 52381202614080053655custom 54135966607291393384custom 52737627561834798721

6 Aug 2026, 21:10 UTC58 views19 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Одна из зрителей написала статью о встрече👀 Так мило и интересно было читать💜

custom 523812026140800536576custom 52737627561834798726

6 Aug 2026, 21:10 UTC52 views13 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @svezkkaPhoto

Ребята, только взгляните, какую прекрасную статью написали про наше с Дашей мероприятие «Манхва сегодня: хиты, новинки и долгожданные издания»🤩 Статья: https://dzen.ru/a/am_WOJgpaAzAGOvH Это безумно мило! Спасибо огромное 🤩🤩

7custom 52381202614080053653custom 54135966607291393383

6 Aug 2026, 17:05 UTC62 views15 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Шиповник

custom 52737627561834798727custom 523812026140800536553

5 Aug 2026, 20:59 UTC73 views13 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Тот кто придумал слоуберн фанфики.. Я ненавижу тебя, но в тоже время благодарна... 🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩

5😁5custom 54135966607291393383

4 Aug 2026, 19:24 UTC90 views8 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Я пошла разгребать сообщения... Никому не отвечаю

4custom 52381202614080053652custom 52737627561834798722

Showing the 12 most recent of 13 posts we hold for @kiraboshi_chaotic. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,129,063 of 1,480,944entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Kiraboshi /// Упорядоченный хаос” (@kiraboshi_chaotic), 136 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/kiraboshi_chaotic.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.