Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Kinz Kalls

Channel

Kinz Kalls

@kinzkalls

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Cite this entry

443subscribers

+70 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1004415460678
TypeChannel
Username@kinzkalls
CreatedBetween 1 June 2026 and 5 August 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live10 October 2026
Measurements held10
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 10 October 2026
On Telegramt.me/kinzkalls

Topic

Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 21 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 90% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

373888630.57 August 2026 — 373 subscribers8 August 2026 — 373 subscribers8 August 2026 — 376 subscribers15 August 2026 — 388 subscribers23 August 2026 — 422 subscribers30 August 2026 — 423 subscribers8 September 2026 — 888 subscribers16 September 2026 — 487 subscribers30 September 2026 — 444 subscribers10 October 2026 — 443 subscribers4437 August 202610 October 2026
10 measurements spanning 64 days, net +70. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 296–965 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
10 Oct 2026, 17:58443-1
30 Sept 2026, 17:56444-43
16 Sept 2026, 08:18487-401
8 Sept 2026, 18:57888+465
30 Aug 2026, 21:53423+1
23 Aug 2026, 06:55422+34
15 Aug 2026, 13:16388+12
8 Aug 2026, 16:54376+3
8 Aug 2026, 06:18373no change
7 Aug 2026, 19:36373first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

201 reactions across 19 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 55.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤11155.2%
🔥2713.4%
🙏157.46%
💯115.47%
😁104.98%
🤝83.98%
😭62.99%
🤩52.49%
🤯52.49%
🐳10.498%
🥰10.498%
🫡10.498%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 201 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 22:06 UTC94 views16 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Volume was strong this morning but died off. Right now it's mostly farms and PNDs - the trenches are hungry, but there's no fresh narrative worth chasing yet. Have patience. I won't shill something just for the sake of posting. When the trenches are this hungry and a real narrative finally drops, it sends way harder. Don't trade bs just to trade, that's how you rinse your whole port.

❤8💯6🤝2

7 Aug 2026, 21:34 UTC116 views6 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

What's going on here - pumped from 2m to 25m in minutes and nobody seems to know why. Insiders? Team? Something coming, or just a farm? Guess we'll find out, but volume like this is insane. Not saying to buy, just interesting to keep an eye on.

❤4🐳1🤯1

7 Aug 2026, 20:10 UTC128 views15 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

A couple channels out here running my thesis word for word, love to see it - but there's only one Kinz.

😭6😁5❤2🤯2

7 Aug 2026, 19:45 UTC158 views11 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Remember that the biggest runners are usually born in the bear. Place your bets - chances are the next billion dollar onchain coin has already launched...

❤8🙏2🫡1

7 Aug 2026, 19:26 UTC144 views9 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Good read if you actually wanna understand why the bnb meta is what it is, and catch the pattern so you're early on the next one https://x.com/kinzora_/status/2085809393002852669?s=20

❤6🔥2🤝1

7 Aug 2026, 11:14 UTC161 views15 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Gm volume looks good today, let’s find some gems.

❤10🙏3🔥2

6 Aug 2026, 13:06 UTC181 views20 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Back to back, all documented. Conviction keeps winning for us. Stop fading Kinz. https://x.com/kinzora_/status/2085351123704279442?s=46&t=0xCiDzyRf85DzBWHQCr01w Smash

❤11🔥5🙏3💯1

6 Aug 2026, 12:46 UTC199 views14 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Congrats to those who believed. Clean 5x on size done.

❤9🔥4💯1

6 Aug 2026, 12:45 UTC168 views12 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Robinhood just listed CASHCAT. That’s 2 for 2. Called MarsCoin’s Binance Alpha listing well before it happened, now Cashcat on Robinhood. Kinz doesn’t miss.

❤7🔥3💯2

5 Aug 2026, 23:02 UTC160 views8 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

3x on size with a full thesis laid out, Higher.

❤4🔥2🤯2

5 Aug 2026, 16:30 UTC165 views9 reactionsread 8 August 2026

So much confusion rn, some pools instant migration CAs running, some pools instant only CAs running. Nothing is clear, let things settle down.

❤5🔥3💯1

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @kinzkalls. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Kinz Kalls” (@kinzkalls), 443 subscribers as measured 10 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/kinzkalls.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.