Channel
@kinosanati
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
668subscribers
-4 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001229082177 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @kinosanati |
| Created | 15 April 2019 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 28 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 6 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 28 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/kinosanati |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 28 Aug 2026, 23:08 | 668 | -3 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 22:08 | 671 | -2 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 07:08 | 673 | +2 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 09:34 | 671 | -1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 16:40 | 672 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 11:07 | 672 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 18 March 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 1 October 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
119 reactions across 18 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 57.1% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 68 | 57.1% | |
| ❤ | 34 | 28.6% | |
| 🔥 | 11 | 9.24% | |
| 💘 | 6 | 5.04% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 119reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 18 March 2024 to 1 October 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Муқаддас жой бўш турмайди Болаликни ёки софликни ҳеч қачон сақлаб бўлмайди. Чунки у инсондан эмас. Болаликка доим қайтиш керак. Тинимсиз қайтиш. Доим ҳам тинимсиз қайтиб бўлмайди. Тинимсиз қайтиш жараёнида; болаликдан узоқлашган дунё доим ўзи билан ўзи урушади; одам бир-бирини қирғин қилади. Шундай вақтда Экзюпери “Кичкина шаҳзода”ни ёзганди: бу — одамзотнинг ўзаро қирғини пайтида туғилган илоҳий шуъла, мўъжиза эди.…
❤4🔥3
ҲУРРИЯТ ЭГАЛАРИ Сўзлар маъносидан узилиб қолган даврда яшаяпмиз. Ёки бу ҳолат доимо шундай бўлиб келганми? Тарихга назар ташласак, у доим шундай эканини айтади. Бироқ, нисбатан олганда, ўтмиш бугунги кундагидек эмас эди шекилли. Яқин келажакда квант компьютерлари пайдо бўлади. Шунда жамият маънодан янада узоқлашадими ёки квант зарраларининг хусусиятлари истеъмолчини – яъни квант компьютерларидан фойдаланувчини – маъ…
Квант механикаси физикларни, образли айтганда, “ақлдан оздирмоқда”. Чунки ташқаридан қараб, квант хусусиятлари ва қонуниятларини кашф қилиб бўлмайди. Аммо вақт ўтиши билан бу қонуниятлар очила боради. Зарралардаги маълумотларни ўқиш квант компьютерлари оммалашгандан сўнг тезлашади. Яъни инсон ўзидаги маълумотни ўқий бошлайди. Қуръони Каримда Аллоҳ таоло коинотни яратиб, уни инсонга бўйсундиргани ҳақидаги оят бор. Та…
👍3🔥3❤1
ЖАФАР ПАНАХИЙ: "УЧ ЮЗ" Эронлик режиссёр Жафар Панахийнинг “Уч юз” фильми Канн кинофестивалида энг яхши сценарий номинациясини қўлга киритди. “Уч юз” фильми эронликлар, шунингдек, Ўзбекистонликлар учун ҳам. Бу фильм Азарбойжонликлар ва Тожикистонликлар учун ҳам беназир кўриниши мумкин. Албатта, россияликлар учун ҳам. Сабаби, кўп ҳолларда, россиялик кинотомошабин Эрон ёки Ўзбекистоннинг маънавий ҳаётининг финиш нуқтала…
👍5❤1
Taqriz: "Buyuk yolg'izlikda qolasan" — Murod Chovushning postmodern kinomatnlar olami Murod Chovushning *"Buyuk yolg'izlikda qolasan"* asari, uning postmodern uslubidagi eng yirik yutuqlaridan biri sifatida taqdim etiladi. Kitobda kinomatnlar — kinolar haqida yozilgan postmodern bitiklar, degan atama, o'ziga xos va murakkab bir tasavvur yaratadi. Bu asar nafaqat kinoni, balki uning estetikasini, tilini va mo‘jizaviy…
💘4👍2❤1
https://youtu.be/5fDDUBwMGsU?si=irvTtDZE3mZkr7e9
👍3
Донишманд Азизиддин Насафий одам ҳаёти давомида ўсимлик руҳи, ҳайвон руҳи ва одам руҳи ва хоказоларга қараб тараққий этишини ёзади. Ўсимлик руҳи, Кафка мисрасида келтиргандек, ҳиссиёти билан дунёга муносабатга киришади. Дунёни тўғридан-тўғри қабул қилади. Ўсимлик ёки ҳайвон руҳи деганда қандайдир бир шарпа манзарасини яратмаслигимиз керак. Ўсимлик руҳи эволюциясида муносабатни тўғридан-тўғри қабул қилмай, мушоҳада…
👍5❤3
“Қалъа” романида муаллиф психологияси ҳам қатнашганида “женский роман” турига ўхшарди. Муаллиф таассуротларини қисмларга бўлиб ташлайди. Қисмларни майдалаб, қиймалайди: хулосага шошилмайди. Хулосага келмайди ҳам. Бўлакларга бўлинган таассуротларга ном бериш банд қилади. Тартиб ўрнатмоқчи бўлади. Кафка “ асар бу форма, бошқа нарса эмас” деб ёзади. Асарни ўқиш ичидан маъно қидиришмас. Мақсад, асарнинг формасини гавд…
❤2👍2
ҚУЁШ ЧАҚНАШЛАРИ Автобусда, поездда, тоғда, йўлда, скамейкада, ишда, уйда эсга тушган бадиий -кино ҳақда ҳаваскор мақолалар ёзилди. 2 йил ёки 3 йилми? Телеграмдаги киносанаъти каналида чиқти. Киномақолалар остида кино соҳасидагилар ва шунҳа яқин, мақолалар кинотанқидга узоқдалигини хўп шарҳлар қилишди, раҳмат. Канал админи, бечора, муаллиф ўта шахсий таассуротларини билдиряпти холос деб кинобилимдонлар олдида узр…
🔥3❤1
Франс Кафканинг “Қўрғон” , узр, “Қалъа” романини олдин рус тилида ўқиганман. Охиригача эмас. Идрокимнинг кучи етмаган. Энди ўзбек тилида охиригача ўқиб қўймоқчи бўлдим. Ҳали тугатмадим. Бу китобни охиригача ўқиш шарт ҳам эмас. Кафканинг кундаликлари кўпроқ қизиқ ва тиниқ (Харьков шаҳридаги “Фолио” нашриётида чиққан). Кундалигидаги кўп жойлар мавҳум бўлсада уларда поэзия борлиги ўқувчида янги қитъани кашф қилдиради. …
👍13❤3
Photo, posted without a caption
👍2
Photo, posted without a caption
❤2
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @kinosanati. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 890,994 of 1,628,524entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 28 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Kino san'ati” (@kinosanati), 668 subscribers as measured 28 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/kinosanati.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.