Холли Берри — 60 😍 Поздравляем звезду «Бала монстров», «Людей Икс», «Готики», «Облачного атласа» и многих других фильмов. Подпишись на 👉 ФИЛЬМЫ КИНО СЕРИАЛЫ
❤2

Channel
@kino_hd2
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · View velocity · Reactions · Advertising · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Telegram's recommendations · Domains linked from posts · Cite this entry
1,138,700subscribers
-8,866 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among the largest entries.
| Telegram ID | -1001202206821 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @kino_hd2 |
| Description | Все материалы размещены по партнёрской програме ivi.ru № 4963743270 менеджер по рекламе: @kuzr103 купить рекламу можно тут: https://telega.in/c/kino_hd2 Администрация не несёт отвественности за рекламу. Будьте внимательны. |
| Created | 12 March 2020 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 10 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 13 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/kino_hd2 |
Film & TV — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 8 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 87% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Aug 2026, 13:16 | 1,138,700 | -1,034 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 15:34 | 1,139,734 | -1,218 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 17:14 | 1,140,952 | -1,624 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 13:52 | 1,142,576 | -988 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 15:32 | 1,143,564 | -1,133 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 14:03 | 1,144,697 | -1,559 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 11:40 | 1,146,256 | -867 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 14:12 | 1,147,123 | -443 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 04:15 | 1,147,566 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 04:07 | 1,147,566 | first reading |
88 posts held, back to 1 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 26 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 82 of 88 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 14 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 88 (1 August 2026 – 14 August 2026) |
| Views total | 553,466 |
| Reactions total | 650 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 14 Aug 2026, 20:11 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 14 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 15 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
How fast this channel’s own posts pick up views, from re-reading them repeatedly in the hours and days after they were published rather than the single reading most entries on this register get. Coverage is early and only a small minority of channels hold it at all — a gap in this section means the post has not been re-read again yet, not that nothing happened.
Computed from 74 of this channel’s own posts over the last 30 days: across 56of this channel’s own posts with a clear reading, a typical one reaches half of its last-observed view count within 12 hours of being posted; a typical post has already reached 11.8% of its 24-hour view count within the first hour, and 45.9% within the first six; the median 24-hour reach across those posts is 4,235 views — 0.372% of this channel’s own subscriber count (90th percentile 5,143).
| Post | Readings | Latest reading | Curve | 24h reach | Half of last-observed views by |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| /5094114 Aug 2026, 19:33 UTC | 23 minutes – 38 minutes old | 488 views2 reactions | no checkpoint reading yet | not yet at 24h | 18 minutesprovisional — final view count still climbing |
| /5094014 Aug 2026, 18:32 UTC | 330 minutes – 1.6 hours old | 928 views1 reaction | 60 minutes: 540 interp.still climbing at last reading | not yet at 24h | 49 minutesprovisional — final view count still climbing |
| /5093914 Aug 2026, 15:07 UTC | 116 minutes – 5.1 hours old | 2,170 views ~13 reactions | 60 minutes: 561 interp. → 3.0 hours: 1,340still climbing at last reading | not yet at 24h | 2.3 hoursprovisional — final view count still climbing |
| /5093814 Aug 2026, 14:00 UTC | 133 minutes – 6.2 hours old | 2,250 views ~6 reactions | 60 minutes: 488 interp. → 3.0 hours: 1,251 interp. → 6.0 hours: 2,250still climbing at last reading | not yet at 24h | 2.6 hoursprovisional — final view count still climbing |
| /5093714 Aug 2026, 13:00 UTC | 152 minutes – 7.2 hours old | 2,360 views ~no reaction reading | 60 minutes: 478 → 3.0 hours: 1,184 interp. → 6.0 hours: 2,110still climbing at last reading | not yet at 24h | 3.0 hoursprovisional — final view count still climbing |
| /5093614 Aug 2026, 12:07 UTC | 1621 minutes – 8.1 hours old | 2,140 views ~4 reactions | 60 minutes: 590 interp. → 3.0 hours: 1,150 → 6.0 hours: 1,740still climbing at last reading | not yet at 24h | 2.8 hoursprovisional — final view count still climbing |
| /5093514 Aug 2026, 11:05 UTC | 1812 minutes – 9.1 hours old | 2,370 views ~2 reactions | 60 minutes: 469 interp. → 3.0 hours: 1,170 → 6.0 hours: 1,860still climbing at last reading | not yet at 24h | 3.0 hoursprovisional — final view count still climbing |
| /5093414 Aug 2026, 10:48 UTC | 1829 minutes – 9.4 hours old | 2,260 views ~2 reactions | 60 minutes: 481 interp. → 3.0 hours: 1,103 interp. → 6.0 hours: 1,680still climbing at last reading | not yet at 24h | 3.1 hoursprovisional — final view count still climbing |
Curve is every standard checkpoint we hold a reading for (+1h, +3h, +6h, +12h, +24h, +48h, +7d after posting) — measured where a real reading landed close enough to that age, interpolated where it did not but readings on both sides let one be worked out between them. Nothing is ever extrapolated past the last real reading. Latest reading is the newest view and reaction count we hold for the post, side by side, so a gap between how views and reactions moved is visible without following it into the Observations section above. 24h reach is that one checkpoint on its own, labelled the same way. Half of last-observed viewsis the age at which a post’s view count crossed half of the highest figure we have read for it so far — an upper bound when the very first reading was already past half (we cannot see the actual crossing), and biased low while the post is still climbing, since “half of final” is dividing by a number that has not finished growing yet. Both caveats are printed inline wherever they apply, never silently dropped.
650 reactions across 81 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 68.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 443 | 68.2% | |
| 👍 | 73 | 11.2% | |
| ❤🔥 | 36 | 5.54% | |
| 🎉 | 20 | 3.08% | |
| 🔥 | 18 | 2.77% | |
| 💋 | 15 | 2.31% | |
| 🏆 | 11 | 1.69% | |
| 🤩 | 11 | 1.69% | |
| 😍 | 8 | 1.23% | |
| 🍓 | 6 | 0.923% | |
| 💯 | 6 | 0.923% | |
| 🥰 | 3 | 0.462% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 82 of the 88 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 650reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 88 most recent posts we hold, published 1 August 2026 to 14 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.
This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor.A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.
Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. They are printed side by side with the count behind each rather than as a ratio: an ad and an ordinary post are not otherwise matched — for topic, for length, for hour of day — so the gap between them is a description of two groups and not the effect of one being an ad.
| erid | Posts | First seen | Last seen |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2SDnjct3pTm | 3 | 2 August 2026 | 14 August 2026 |
| 2SDnjeA1oq5 | 3 | 6 August 2026 | 11 August 2026 |
| 2SDnjcXHzWw | 2 | 5 August 2026 | 10 August 2026 |
| 2SDnje8AKM5 | 2 | 8 August 2026 | 12 August 2026 |
| 2SDnjbocwuM | 1 | 7 August 2026 | 7 August 2026 |
| 2SDnjcAP7L7 | 1 | 4 August 2026 | 4 August 2026 |
| 2SDnjcAcD7R | 1 | 7 August 2026 | 7 August 2026 |
| 2SDnjcLQvXc | 1 | 5 August 2026 | 5 August 2026 |
| 2SDnjcoSTto | 1 | 3 August 2026 | 3 August 2026 |
| 2SDnjcoga7u | 1 | 2 August 2026 | 2 August 2026 |
| 2SDnjdGDx5R | 1 | 2 August 2026 | 2 August 2026 |
| 2SDnjdHcZjH | 1 | 1 August 2026 | 1 August 2026 |
A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it. 10 further tokens are held for this entry and not listed here.
Measured over the 88 most recent posts we hold, published 1 August 2026 to 14 August 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.
Холли Берри — 60 😍 Поздравляем звезду «Бала монстров», «Людей Икс», «Готики», «Облачного атласа» и многих других фильмов. Подпишись на 👉 ФИЛЬМЫ КИНО СЕРИАЛЫ
❤2
Posted without readable text
❤1
ТРИ ЛЮБВИ ПИТЕРА ПАРКЕРА У каждого Человека-паука была своя история любви — и каждая из них стала важной частью его пути. 1- Мишель «Эм-Джей» Джонс ❤️ 2- Мэри Джейн Уотсон 🔥 3- Гвен Стейси 😍 А ты кого выберешь? Подпишись на 👉 ФИЛЬМЫ КИНО СЕРИАЛЫ
❤10🏆2💋1
Идеально к просмотру фильмов 100% шоколадное удовольствие идеально к просмотру любимого фильма Заказать по привлекательной цене
❤3🍓2🏆1
Подборка лучших Telegram-каналов🔥 🤩 «Дом, где всегда свет горит» Если тебе не хватает живого, дружеского телеграма — загляни к Вере. Она делится тем, как вместе с командой делает рейтинговые шоу на Европе Плюс, спорит о фильмах и сериалах, советует книги, запускает опросы и розыгрыши, а в перерывах обсуждает с душевным чатиком жизнь с мужем-французом, двумя дочками, Котом и собакой, которая часто приходит в гости. …
Вышел тизер 13 сезона «Американской истории ужасов» 🎥 Премьера - 24 сентября. Подпишись на 👉 ФИЛЬМЫ КИНО СЕРИАЛЫ
❤4
Posted without readable text
❤2
Вышла режиссерская версия «Секретных материалов: Хочу верить» спустя 18 лет. Фильм представляет собой современную интерпретацию истории о докторе Франкенштейне. В новую версию добавили больше элементов хоррора, которые изначально вырезали ради рейтинга PG-13. Картина Криса Картера с подзаголовком Vrach Frankenshteyn («Врач Франкенштейн») вышла на семь минут короче оригинальной версии. Подпишись на 👉 ФИЛЬМЫ КИНО С…
❤2
Литвяк (2026) Жанр: биография Кинопоиск — до 45 дней бесплатно! https://gtblg.ru/XdCeg?erid=2SDnjct3pTm Код: UGQL4KKNF3
❤2👍1
Posted without readable text
👍2❤1🤩1
Конор Макгрегор выложил в сторис Олега Монгола и своего двойника из Абакана. Ирландский боец подписал видео так: «Позаботьтесь о моих пацанах! Вы знаете, что делать!» Подпишись на 👉 ФИЛЬМЫ КИНО СЕРИАЛЫ
🏆7❤3👍2
Ужас, кореянка отправилась в отпуск на планету, где проходили съемки «Проект "Конец света"».
❤6❤🔥2👍1
Showing the 12 most recent of 88 posts we hold for @kino_hd2. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 28,172 of 1,340,412entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 9 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@kino_hd2 named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s.When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 12 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 5 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
2 domainsthis channel’s own posts have linked to, measured by scanning the post bodies themselves — not the channel’s description, which is the separate Declared links section below when this entry has one. Appearing here is not a claim about who runs the linked site or why the channel linked to it; an advertisement, a news citation and a malicious link all leave the same kind of row.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ФИЛЬМЫ КИНО СЕРИАЛЫ” (@kino_hd2), 1,138,700 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/kino_hd2.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.