Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

ㅤㅤ𖹭 𝓀wirnichi — 𝒸f

@kinichsgirlfriend

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

106subscribers

+23 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1004461016403
TypeChannel
Username@kinichsgirlfriend
CreatedBetween 1 June 2026 and 30 July 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded9 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 14 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/kinichsgirlfriend

Growth

8310694.56 August 2026 — 83 subscribers6 August 2026 — 84 subscribers9 August 2026 — 84 subscribers14 August 2026 — 106 subscribers6 August 202614 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 8 days, net +23. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 80–109 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Aug 2026, 05:46106+22
9 Aug 2026, 17:1684no change
6 Aug 2026, 18:2684+1
6 Aug 2026, 12:0683first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 30 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
151.2%
avg views ÷ 106 subscribers
Avg views / post
160
19 posts measured
Reaction rate
28.0%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
19
of 19 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 15 of 19 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 9 August 2026
Posts held19 (30 July 20269 August 2026)
Views total3,045
Reactions total637
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken9 Aug 2026, 17:16 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

637 reactions across 15 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 25.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 542707889807875349416225.4%
custom 542730668166929620112519.6%
custom 54296262603618798049114.3%
custom 5426933530615652790629.73%
custom 5427244748240891221609.42%
custom 5427012407690044366589.11%
custom 5427346590505410438426.59%
custom 5429117512895737646375.81%

Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 637reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 30 July 2026 to 9 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
22
across the posts below
Posts paid on
6
of 19 we hold a reading for · 32%
Most on one post
10
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @kinichsgirlfriend. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 19 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 30 July 2026 to 9 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

9 Aug 2026, 13:17 UTC45 views16 reactionsread 9 August 2026

ОМГ рина шпасибо за звездошки😭

custom 54273066816692962017custom 54273465905054104385custom 54270124076900443664

9 Aug 2026, 13:07 UTC47 views21 reactionsread 9 August 2026

так что думаю сделаю малышке ещё один стикер и займусь ее особым блюдом😛.. а пока что я рисую контент надеюсь к вечеру хоть сегодня успею всех цьем

custom 54270788980787534948custom 54269335306156527905custom 54270124076900443665custom 54272447482408912211custom 54273066816692962011custom 54296262603618798041

9 Aug 2026, 13:04 UTC50 views64 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

umm гайс у нас тут опять обновочка от любимоц подрушки кедобишки киссерши ахава сделаля мне редизайн и отрисовала мне дизайн на малыху😧 вы знаете ч очен плачу опять ььив

custom 542707889807875349424custom 542734659050541043819custom 542693353061565279018custom 54270124076900443661custom 54273066816692962011custom 54296262603618798041

8 Aug 2026, 15:00 UTC62 views56 reactionsread 9 August 2026

севодня пост к сожелению не смогу выложить и выложу завтра с утреца..🌟 хочу сказать что я плачусь и радуюсь очень сильно ведь уже 90 (91) попишеков а значит скоро 100 ..😳 никогда бы не подумала что за такой КРАТКИЙ срок смогу столька набрать попищеков.. я вас всех так люблю честно😭 всех до единого тут скажуу из последнего что я заказала сумку чтобы потом оформить ити баг с киничем😳, у планах вообще была плюшич с кини

custom 542962626036187980418custom 542730668166929620115custom 542707889807875349412custom 54291175128957376466custom 54270124076900443663custom 54269335306156527902

6 Aug 2026, 13:45 UTC81 views2 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @azul_kisserPhoto

⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀Интерактив Вы и ваш ф/о как котопуфики. Если же у вашего ф/о уже есть котопуфик,я могу нарисовать вашу сону как котопуфик<3 ─────────────────────────── 1. Подписка без дальнейший отписки & репост (Не стиком) 2. Фото вашей Соны и ф/о Места не ограничены,но!,пост будет "закрыть" в воскресенье. ─────────────────────────── ୭ ˚.Важное ᵎᵎ Не делаю даблам Мью. Если выходите после результатов, автоматом бан. Проверь

custom 54270788980787534942

6 Aug 2026, 07:48 UTC138 views49 reactionsread 9 August 2026

всем хайо опять!😌 хояу сказать что нас уже 80 и я прям плячу слезку пускаю от того насколько я рада спасибо всем огромное я буду пытаться баловать вас контентом через день, если не буду успевать то чуть позже🥰 помните ваши ф/о вас киссают и любят 😳

custom 542730668166929620118custom 542701240769004436611custom 542962626036187980411custom 54291175128957376463custom 54269335306156527902custom 54270788980787534942custom 54272447482408912212

6 Aug 2026, 06:29 UTC134 views76 reactions1 Starread 9 August 2026
Photo

🤩~💗 застеснялись малыши.. мне безумно нравися рисовать моего любмикиного кинича ..🥰 и мне беезумно нравиться что я закончила этотарт с моими прелестями❤️ cr : я 🤩🤩#kwirnichi

custom 542730668166929620123custom 542962626036187980419custom 542911751289573764617custom 54273465905054104385custom 54270124076900443664custom 54270788980787534944custom 54272447482408912214

5 Aug 2026, 12:02 UTC142 views28 reactionsread 9 August 2026

ОЧИН ТРОГАТЕЛЬНО ДЛЯ МИНЯ ехе я рада что кому то действительно инетересен мой юме я аж растрогалась слезку пустила🥰

custom 542701240769004436614custom 54270788980787534947custom 54296262603618798047

4 Aug 2026, 21:23 UTC156 views23 reactionsread 9 August 2026

спасибо за звезды сталв🥺! всем цьем завтра пост!

custom 54269335306156527908custom 54270788980787534948custom 54273066816692962017

4 Aug 2026, 16:16 UTC156 views15 reactions10 Starsread 9 August 2026

был пост 😳 спасибо за звездошку наникома и свиит буу!

custom 54273066816692962018custom 54270788980787534944custom 54272447482408912213

3 Aug 2026, 07:32 UTC199 views86 reactions3 Starsread 9 August 2026
Photo

🤩~💗 что если бы квирава и кинич были в современной вселенной ??! делюсь моим любимым артицем над которым я буквально ещё недавно плакала от умиления.. срз!! cr : @dushkaflinscanon 🤩🤩#kwirnichi

custom 542724474824089122127custom 542962626036187980423custom 542707889807875349420custom 54270124076900443668custom 54269335306156527904custom 54273066816692962014

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @kinichsgirlfriend. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 458,807 of 1,478,351entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 9 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“ㅤㅤ𖹭 𝓀wirnichi — 𝒸f” (@kinichsgirlfriend), 106 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/kinichsgirlfriend.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.