云图の吃瓜频道 pinned Deleted message

Channel
云图の吃瓜频道
@kinh_wintool
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
148subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001249424343 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @kinh_wintool |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/kinh_wintool |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Aug 2026, 20:16 | 148 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 06:13 | 148 | first reading |
Engagement
15 posts held, back to 6 October 2022 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 15 posts for this entry, the most recent from 17 May 2023. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- 100
- Videos
- 15
- Links
- 47
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
- Video runtime
- 30s
- Average length
- 15s
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
39 reactions across 10 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 23.1% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 💩 | 9 | 23.1% | |
| 👍 | 6 | 15.4% | |
| ⚡ | 5 | 12.8% | |
| ❤ | 4 | 10.3% | |
| 🤣 | 4 | 10.3% | |
| ❤🔥 | 3 | 7.69% | |
| 🐳 | 3 | 7.69% | |
| 🥰 | 3 | 7.69% | |
| 🏆 | 2 | 5.13% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 39reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 6 October 2022 to 17 May 2023, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Photo, posted without a caption
🤣4💩1
Signed smile_小沐『我只是TG上的一个混子』
灵动岛
❤🔥3🏆2💩1
Signed smile_小沐『我只是TG上的一个混子』
Video, posted without a caption
👍4
Signed smile_小沐『我只是TG上的一个混子』
Photo, posted without a caption
Signed smile_小沐『我只是TG上的一个混子』
新年快乐,讨个红包包🥰 https://t.me/pixivshare/389
Signed smile_小沐『我只是TG上的一个混子』
🧧🧧🧧🧧🧧🧧🧧🧧🧧🧧🧧🧧🧧🧧🧧🧧🧧🧧🧧🧧🧧🧧🧧🧧🧧🧧🧧🧧🧧🧧🧧🧧🧧🧧🧧🧧🧧🧧🧧🧧🧧🧧🧧🧧🧧🧧🧧🧧🧧🧧🧧🧧🧧🧧🧧🧧🧧🧧🧧🧧🧧🧧🧧🧧🧧🧧🧧🧧🧧🧧🧧🧧🧧🧧🧧🧧🧧🧧🧧🧧🧧🧧🧧🧧🧧🧧🧧🧧🧧🧧🧧🧧🧧🧧🧧🧧🧧🧧🧧🧧🧧🧧🧧🧧🧧🧧🧧🧧🧧🧧🧧🧧🧧🧧🧧🧧🧧🧧🧧🧧🧧🧧🧧🧧🧧🧧🧧🧧🧧🧧🧧🧧🧧🧧🧧🧧🧧🧧🧧🧧🧧🧧🧧🧧🧧🧧🧧🧧🧧🧧🧧🧧🧧🧧🧧🧧🧧🧧🧧🧧🧧🧧🧧🧧🧧🧧🧧🧧🧧🧧🧧🧧🧧🧧🧧🧧🧧🧧🧧🧧🧧🧧🧧🧧🧧🧧🧧🧧🧧🧧🧧🧧🧧🧧🧧🧧🧧🧧🧧🧧🧧🧧 人人一个,不要抢
Signed smile_小沐『我只是TG上的一个混子』
幻视合集
⚡5
Signed smile_小沐『我只是TG上的一个混子』
频道推荐:全网漫游指南 继承《全球概览》的探索精神,让互联网浏览重新变得有趣。 秉持着指南初心,全网漫游指南平台致力于打造出一款聚集全网最有价值的工具库 >>>>> @TheWebGuide <<<<<
❤3
Signed smile_小沐
该来的还是会来 秒变小阳人
🐳3🥰3
Signed smile_小沐
在埃隆-马斯克关于唐纳德-特朗普的账户是否应该在推特上解禁的 投票 之后,超过1.34亿人看到了这个 投票,1500多万人投票。51.8%的人投了 "赞同"。因此,今天,推特恢复了 特朗普 的 账户。 @Telonews_cn
👍1
Signed smile_小沐
#投稿 网课期间,老师在群里点名批评学生学习不好,孩子被家长抽的浑身青紫,还要杀了孩子给老师助助兴。这个老师不负责任的将教学任务推给家长之前,不知道有没有考虑到过这个情况? ps:打人的是家长,关老师什么事?
💩2
Signed smile_小沐
Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @kinh_wintool. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“云图の吃瓜频道” (@kinh_wintool), 148 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/kinh_wintool.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.