Channel
@kingtaeminkook
On this record: Growth ยท Engagement ยท Reactions ยท Advertising ยท Posts ยท Citations ยท Handles named that no longer answer ยท Cite this entry
1,104subscribers
-7 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register ยท movement among entries of 1,000โ3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001721307711 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @kingtaeminkook |
| Created | 17 October 2021 โ measured โ cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/kingtaeminkook |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 16:14 | 1,104 | -7 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 17:53 | 1,111 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 12:18 | 1,111 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 26 March 2024 โ the reader has not yet reached the start of this channelโs public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegramโs post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute โ we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 20 March 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
81 reactions across 15 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 40.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ๐ฅฐ | 33 | 40.7% | |
| โคโ๐ฅ | 14 | 17.3% | |
| โค | 11 | 13.6% | |
| ๐ฅ | 10 | 12.3% | |
| ๐ | 6 | 7.41% | |
| ๐ | 5 | 6.17% | |
| ๐ | 2 | 2.47% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities โ ๐ is thanks in one channel and mourning in another โ so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one โ 4.34K, 1.2M โ so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegramโs own count on each post โ not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above โ those same posts carry 81reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by โa reaction total printed elsewhere on the pageโ.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 26 March 2024 to 20 March 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #ัะตะบะปะฐะผะฐ / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides โ nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.
This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor.A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means โthe share of posts that declared themselvesโ, never โthe share of posts that were paid forโ. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.
Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like โads get x% fewer viewsโ โ an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.
| erid | Posts | First seen | Last seen |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20260320101214278715010300166112569239690 | 1 | 20 March 2026 | 20 March 2026 |
A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry โ we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 26 March 2024 to 20 March 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.
https://link.dana.id/danakaget?c=ssrtp653y&r=bqB4Wh&orderId=20260320101214278715010300166112569239690
๐ฅ2โค1
Minal aidzin wal faidzin
๐ฅฐ1
Selamat menunaikan ibadah puasa buat yang islam
โค3
Ada yang kangen ga sama ktmk?
๐ฅฐ4โคโ๐ฅ1
Long time no see
๐3๐ฅฐ2๐ฅ1
Channel name was changed to ยซ่ฐท ๐ด๐ณ๐ฎ ๐๐๐ก๐ ๐ง๐๐๐ ๐๐ก๐๐ข๐ข๐ยป
๐ค๐ค๐ค
๐ฅฐ8๐2
Comeback gas??
๐ฅฐ9๐ฅ3๐3
Pengen comeback aslinya
๐ฅ4๐ฅฐ2
Sticker, posted without a caption
๐ฅฐ1
Kangen ga lek
๐ฅฐ6โค1
Channel name was changed to ยซRombak ่ฐท ๐ด๐ณ๐ฎ ๐๐๐ก๐ ๐ง๐๐๐ ๐๐ก๐๐ข๐ข๐ยป
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @kingtaeminkook. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked โ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it โ t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so โ1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank โ 37,368 of 1,350,102entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below โ republished posts weigh more than named mentions โ and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channelโs name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page โ a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 120 registered channels โ every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched โ that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting todayโs namer to yesterdayโs owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason โ naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides โ the โNamed by N registered channelsโ figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@kingtaeminkook named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handleโs history โ see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today โ not that anything โdiedโ. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel โ we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 โ this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
โ่ฐท ๐ด๐ณ๐ฎ ๐๐๐ก๐ ๐ง๐๐๐ ๐๐ก๐๐ข๐ข๐โ (@kingtaeminkook), 1,104 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/kingtaeminkook.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV ยท JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.