Channel
@kingla_crypto
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Cite this entry
602subscribers
-5 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001739555773 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @kingla_crypto |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 13 April 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 22 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 22 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/kingla_crypto |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 22 Aug 2026, 17:48 | 602 | -1 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 23:04 | 603 | -4 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 07:32 | 607 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 09:18 | 607 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 13 April 2023 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 15 September 2023. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
667 reactions across 19 posts, in 15 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 45.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 302 | 45.3% | |
| 🔥 | 116 | 17.4% | |
| 👍 | 96 | 14.4% | |
| 🐳 | 41 | 6.15% | |
| 👌 | 31 | 4.65% | |
| 🙏 | 20 | 3.00% | |
| 👏 | 17 | 2.55% | |
| 👎 | 13 | 1.95% | |
| 🏆 | 8 | 1.20% | |
| 😁 | 8 | 1.20% | |
| 🥰 | 5 | 0.75% | |
| 🎉 | 3 | 0.45% | |
| 😇 | 3 | 0.45% | |
| 💯 | 2 | 0.3% | |
| 😍 | 2 | 0.3% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 667reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 13 April 2023 to 15 September 2023, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
I've never posted long posts on Twitter before, but this is the first time I'm doing so. Typically, I prefer to share this kind of content exclusively on my Telegram Channel. However, I'm making an exception today, and I've outlined my current thoughts in this post. It's a relatively straightforward and simple post full of information, but because it's quite lengthy, I recommend bookmarking it for later. If you have…
❤16🎉2🥰2🙏1
Tomorrow, I will share a detailed breakdown of the current market. https://twitter.com/kinglacrypto/status/1702385433710137724
❤18🔥1
Today marked the first time I didn't quite hit the mark with my market prediction here. I have to acknowledge the fruitful journey I've had since the start of the year, wisely riding the ups and making the most of every downturn. This strategy has not only enhanced my portfolio but also enriched my life, allowing me to fully enjoy this summer. I had strongly believed Bitcoin would reach a value of $38,100. However,…
🔥22❤7👍7🙏3👎2
$38,100.
❤54🔥12👌5🐳3👎3
We did it again.
❤38🔥5😁3👌2👎1
Seldom do I engage with specific trading patterns, as they are often perceived as mechanisms to ensnare the average retail traders. However, the current one demonstrates impeccable alignment with prevailing market dynamics. This particular situation piqued my interest. As my current roster of orders is fully occupied, in line with our prior discussion, I'll be waiting for my orders to get filled, vigilantly monitor…
👍16❤7🔥6👎1
More buys about to be filled.
👍15🔥5🥰2👎1
Your still not too late entering the markets.
❤20🙏7🔥4😍2
As per the axiom of trading, "the trend is your friend," a philosophy which we've steadfastly adhered to. Our keen analysis allowed us to take full advantage of the recent price correction. In light of current data and as previously noted in this Telegram channel, it appears prudent to reassume a bullish position at this juncture. https://twitter.com/kinglacrypto/status/1660600961281277959
❤12👍6😁2
Sometimes I myself am even amazed by how accurate my calls are.
🔥33❤6👍5👎5🏆4
I wanted to briefly update everyone on the recent market activity: I accurately anticipated and communicated the price movement range of $30k to $31k, which turned out to be a successful prediction. Throughout the ongoing upward trend, I effectively analyzed both upward and downward movements, allowing me to make informed trading decisions. During the recent downward phase of the past few weeks, I strategically tr…
❤48👍13👌4🙏3💯2
It's time to...
🐳38🔥15🏆4👌4👏4
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @kingla_crypto. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 22 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“King La Crypto” (@kingla_crypto), 602 subscribers as measured 22 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/kingla_crypto.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.