Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 𝒌𝒕𝒏𝒌𝒗 𝑽𝑶𝑻𝑬𝑪𝑴 !

Channel

𝒌𝒕𝒏𝒌𝒗 𝑽𝑶𝑻𝑬𝑪𝑴 !

@kimnamgyuscopy

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

5subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 12 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003765640833
TypeChannel
Username@kimnamgyuscopy
Created7 February 2026measured — dated from the channel’s first post
First recorded13 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/kimnamgyuscopy

Growth

512 Aug 2026, 22:58 — 5 subscribers13 Aug 2026, 00:01 — 5 subscribers12 Aug 2026, 22:5813 Aug 2026, 00:01
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 4–6 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 00:015no change
12 Aug 2026, 22:585first reading

Engagement

5 posts held, back to 7 February 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 5 posts for this entry, the most recent from 17 March 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos
3
Links
1

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 13 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

160 reactions across 2 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 28.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 52221264474428204234628.7%
custom 53931612406945184413119.4%
custom 52287979489927143541811.3%
custom 5229007255633950699159.38%
custom 5287230536673154867148.75%
custom 5447479558943049164138.13%
custom 5445353103454930947127.50%
custom 5465608332431620598116.88%

Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 3 of the 5 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 160reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 5 most recent posts we hold, published 7 February 2026 to 17 March 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

17 Mar 2026, 17:55 UTC286 viewsread 13 August 2026
Photo

. .🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤 🔤 🤠 ❕❕❕❕❕❕❕❕❕ ШАБЛОН АНКЕТ ♟ О1 . псвед , местоимения , сколько гс даете О2 . состоите ли в каком-то клане? если да , то в каком? О3 . персонаж , фд , звание , делите или нет . пишите ТОЛЬКО приоров [ лимит = 5 персов ] О4 . сможете тапать мне на всех приорах ? нет = отказ обязательные требования :: у вас есть телеграм премиум, даете минимум 21 гс.

7 Feb 2026, 14:15 UTC389 views81 reactionsread 13 August 2026

😀 ♟ котенков ходит на . . [ порядок = приоритетность ] ✨✨✨✨✨✨❕❕ ✨ . . не делю ♟♟ namgyu ⸜ ⸜ 𝒔𝒒𝒖𝒊𝒅 𝒈𝒂𝒎𝒆 [ все звания ] 🥹🥹 ❤️ momonga ⸜ ⸜ 𝒄𝒉𝒊𝒊𝒌𝒂𝒘𝒂 🥹🥹 [ все звания, кроме нег ] 😡 thebrianmaps ⸜ ⸜ 𝒚𝒐𝒖𝒕𝒖𝒃𝒆𝒓𝒔 [ все звания, кроме нег ] 🌟 enid sinclair ⸜ ⸜ 𝒘𝒆𝒅𝒏𝒆𝒔𝒅𝒂𝒚 🥹🥹 [ все звания, кроме нег + ирл ] 🤩

custom 522212644744282042324custom 539316124069451844120custom 52290072556339506998custom 52287979489927143546custom 52872305366731548676custom 54453531034549309476custom 54474795589430491646custom 54656083324316205985

7 Feb 2026, 13:49 UTC376 views79 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

😀♟♟♟ . . heya, who is the best ?? `` псевд → котенков ! `` местоимения → he/him строго <🥹> даю 21—84 гс (42 разом, остальные дотапаю позже, если подождете), а также могу сделать рассыл по постояшкам/вз чатам при необходимости. update :: теперь еще могу кинуть в клан, если вы дадите больше гс, чем я могу дать самостоятельно ⏰ 🥹 🥹🥹🥹 ❤️ <❤️> не смогу тапнуть за вас,

custom 522212644744282042322custom 522879794899271435412custom 539316124069451844111custom 52872305366731548678custom 52290072556339506997custom 54474795589430491647custom 54453531034549309476custom 54656083324316205986

Showing the 5 most recent of 5 posts we hold for @kimnamgyuscopy. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,394,952 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“𝒌𝒕𝒏𝒌𝒗 𝑽𝑶𝑻𝑬𝑪𝑴 !” (@kimnamgyuscopy), 5 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/kimnamgyuscopy.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.