Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

кимиву рыбина 🐟

@kimiwuu

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

593subscribers

-2 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002332585689
TypeChannel
Username@kimiwuu
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live8 August 2026
Measurements held2
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 8 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/kimiwuu

Growth

5935955948 Aug 2026, 07:47 — 595 subscribers8 Aug 2026, 21:02 — 593 subscribers8 Aug 2026, 07:478 Aug 2026, 21:02
2 measurements taken within a single day, net -2. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 593–595 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
8 Aug 2026, 21:02593-2
8 Aug 2026, 07:47595first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 25 March 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 12 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

136 reactions across 19 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 46.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
6346.3%
🍓2518.4%
💯2115.4%
💋1611.8%
❤‍🔥118.09%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 136reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 25 March 2026 to 12 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
2
across the posts below
Posts paid on
2
of 20 we hold a reading for · 10%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @kimiwuu. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 25 March 2026 to 12 July 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

12 Jul 2026, 17:37 UTC208 views13 reactions1 Starread 8 August 2026

все кто отписываются от этого святого канала попадут в ад где им придется смоьреть стримы линча вечность

💋13

12 Jul 2026, 17:35 UTC221 views3 reactionsread 8 August 2026

ЛЕГАЛИЗАЦИЯ ШОТАКОНА И ПОРКА НАЗАРБАЕВА ЗАВТРА В 3

❤‍🔥3

12 Jul 2026, 17:35 UTC211 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026

это отголоски мьюкм или что

1

12 Jul 2026, 17:35 UTC210 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026

вау микутао спасибо за звёздочку подожди у тебя очень знакомый ник

1

12 Jul 2026, 17:26 UTC219 views21 reactions1 Starread 8 August 2026
Photo

оставляю тут шотакон и ухожу снова на несколько месяцев до следующих интересных новостей

15❤‍🔥3💯3

12 Jul 2026, 17:00 UTC214 views6 reactionsread 8 August 2026

это уже не доска позора это доска почета

5💋1

12 Jul 2026, 17:00 UTC218 views8 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Ты очень давно не рисовала педо яой всё в порядке?

7🍓1

12 Jul 2026, 16:56 UTC216 views9 reactionsread 8 August 2026

и кто тут более продуктивен

💯7💋2

12 Jul 2026, 16:56 UTC217 views7 reactionsread 8 August 2026

пока линч юзал ии кимиву словила уже три фикса на даркшипы

🍓7

12 Jul 2026, 16:48 UTC224 views4 reactionsread 8 August 2026

че с вашим фд происходит то блять

4

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @kimiwuu. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 886,617 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“кимиву рыбина 🐟” (@kimiwuu), 593 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/kimiwuu.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.