Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

killaz.dev/blog

@killazDev

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

183subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002033608746
TypeChannel
Username@killazDev
Descriptiongolang developer @avitotech @killazius https://github.com/Killazius
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live8 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/killazDev

Growth

1837 Aug 2026, 18:12 — 183 subscribers8 Aug 2026, 12:32 — 183 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 18:128 Aug 2026, 12:32
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 182–184 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
8 Aug 2026, 12:32183no change
7 Aug 2026, 18:12183first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 5 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
136.3%
avg views ÷ 183 subscribers
Avg views / post
249
9 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.25%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
9
of 19 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 7 of 9 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026
Posts held19 (5 June 20266 August 2026)
Views total2,245
Reactions total56
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Aug 2026, 12:32 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
248
Videos
26
Links
50

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

125 reactions across 15 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 59.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 52941076898471193767459.2%
custom 52423564649614787782318.4%
custom 54654052835577335201612.8%
custom 546560231518243752443.20%
custom 524234465380141593932.40%
custom 538231985847614605332.40%
custom 528081389418763963821.60%

Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 125reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 5 June 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

6 Aug 2026, 15:06 UTC107 views2 reactionsread 8 August 2026

4-ех месячный курс для QA от Авито, кому актуально - welcome. регистрация до 16 августа https://start.avito.ru/course-qa https://start.avito.ru/course-qa https://start.avito.ru/course-qa

custom 52941076898471193762

31 Jul 2026, 08:46 UTC229 views5 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

"работай без ошибок, сделай все хорошо"

custom 52941076898471193762custom 54656023151824375242custom 53823198584761460531

30 Jul 2026, 18:55 UTC218 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026

завтра буду смотреть, Боря раскидал по фактам https://youtu.be/jsoKH4Pvld0?si=h_xX0BzFQ-J62nPw

custom 54656023151824375241

30 Jul 2026, 09:14 UTC190 viewsread 8 August 2026

прикольно? или нет? https://yandex.ru/company/news/29-07-2026-01

15 Jul 2026, 12:32 UTC375 views11 reactionsread 8 August 2026

норм у меня паблик новостей про авито и рандомных картинок? работаю, стараюсь

custom 52423564649614787788custom 52423446538014159392custom 54656023151824375241

15 Jul 2026, 12:30 UTC344 views3 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @bbbreaking

Пользователи "Авито" старше 14 лет теперь смогут подтверждать подлинность своего профиля через "Госуслуги" — раньше это можно было делать только с 18 лет, пишут РИА Новости. Расширение возрастных рамок реализовано в партнерстве с Минцифры. А если система в целях безопасности ограничила доступ к аккаунту, например, при признаках взлома, подростки смогут использовать новый механизм "Позвать взрослого", где родитель ил

custom 52423564649614787783

11 Jul 2026, 16:11 UTC320 views11 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

custom 529410768984711937611

6 Jul 2026, 15:49 UTC395 views3 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

Кто помнит Go&Grill в Москве? Так вот — собираемся в СПб, потому что 22 июля проведём Go&Grill там! План простой: 1⃣22 июля идём в бар «Юнион» 2⃣там в командах играем в Fast food System Design — прикидываем архитектуру для мемных проектов (ну, например, для системы охлаждения пива в офисе 😂) 3⃣не забываем наслаждаться ништяками с гриля и разнообразными напитками 4⃣ чиллим и болтаем со всеми в лаундж-зоне Ну не пла

custom 52423564649614787782custom 52423446538014159391

2 Jul 2026, 16:39 UTC387 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026

отказался от rtk в пользу второго аккаунта с подпиской 20 долларов оставил только системный промпт на go test, там сильно экономит, в остальном не очень и иногда руинит поиск по файлам

custom 53823198584761460531

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @killazDev. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“killaz.dev/blog” (@killazDev), 183 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/killazDev.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.