Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 🍓Канал Кики дебиловича🍓

Channel

🍓Канал Кики дебиловича🍓

@kiki_cos_lox

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

360subscribers

+10 since we began measuring on 10 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001719791853
TypeChannel
Username@kiki_cos_lox
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded10 August 2026
Last confirmed live11 September 2026
Measurements held6
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 11 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/kiki_cos_lox

Topic

Gaming — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 22 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 95% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

349360354.510 August 2026 — 350 subscribers10 August 2026 — 349 subscribers17 August 2026 — 354 subscribers25 August 2026 — 356 subscribers1 September 2026 — 359 subscribers11 September 2026 — 360 subscribers10 August 202611 September 2026
6 measurements spanning 32 days, net +10. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 347–362 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
11 Sept 2026, 02:16360+1
1 Sept 2026, 19:38359+3
25 Aug 2026, 03:48356+2
17 Aug 2026, 11:55354+5
10 Aug 2026, 17:46349-1
10 Aug 2026, 00:16350first reading

Engagement

17 posts held, back to 4 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 17 posts for this entry, the most recent from 9 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

188 reactions across 17 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 38.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
7338.8%
custom 54404011564864834372211.7%
👾189.57%
custom 5440716467215540650179.04%
custom 5235639045916207782136.91%
🍓126.38%
custom 533715163733925664684.26%
❤‍🔥84.26%
😨84.26%
🙏73.72%
😎21.06%

Custom emoji. 4 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 188 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 4 July 2026 to 9 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

9 Aug 2026, 18:01 UTC63 views7 reactionsread 10 August 2026

Коллаб с милейшей мьюшкой!! Глядите на красоту, которую она сделала🙏🥹

custom 54404011564864834377

9 Aug 2026, 18:00 UTC58 views11 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Forwarded from @nemuppetPhoto

🖊𝑆𝐸𝐶𝑅𝐸𝑇𝐴𝑅𝑌×𝘚𝘌𝘊𝘙𝘌𝘛 𝘈𝘎𝘌𝘕𝘛🔎 ʙʏ ᴍᴜᴘᴘᴇᴛ × ᴋɪᴋɪ —𝘚𝘰𝘮𝘦𝘵𝘩𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘵𝘦𝘳𝘳𝘪𝘣𝘭𝘦 𝘩𝘢𝘱𝘱𝘦𝘯𝘦𝘥 𝘩𝘦𝘳𝘦. 𝘓𝘰𝘯𝘨 𝘢𝘨𝘰. 𝘐 𝘸𝘰𝘯'𝘵 𝘣𝘰𝘳𝘦 𝘺𝘰𝘶 𝘸𝘪𝘵𝘩 𝘪𝘵. 𝘛𝘩𝘦𝘳𝘦 𝘸𝘦𝘳𝘦… 𝘰𝘵𝘩𝘦𝘳𝘴 𝘣𝘦𝘧𝘰𝘳𝘦 𝘺𝘰𝘶. 𝘉𝘦𝘧𝘰𝘳𝘦 𝘢𝘭𝘭 𝘰𝘧 𝘵𝘩𝘪𝘴. 🕹𝗀𝖺𝗆𝖾: 𝖺𝗇𝗂𝗆𝖺𝗅 𝗁𝗈𝗌𝗉𝗂𝗍𝖺𝗅 (𝖱𝗈𝖻𝗅𝗈𝗑) 🎙𝖼𝗁: 𝗌𝖾𝖼𝗋𝖾𝗍𝖺𝗋𝗒 × 𝗌𝖾𝖼𝗋𝖾𝗍 𝖺𝗀𝖾𝗇𝗍 𝗍𝗀𝖼: 𝗇𝖾𝗆𝗎𝗉𝗉𝖾𝗍 × 𝗄𝗂𝗄𝗂_𝖼𝗈𝗌_𝗅𝗈𝗑 𝗍𝗍: 𝗇𝖾𝗆𝗎𝗉𝗉𝖾𝗍 × .𝗄𝗂𝗄𝗂_𝖼𝗈𝗌

custom 544071646721554065092

27 Jul 2026, 16:03 UTC161 views7 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Video

Video, posted without a caption

custom 53371516373392566467

27 Jul 2026, 16:03 UTC155 views13 reactionsread 10 August 2026

Я в ужасе с тт последнее время. Теперь там будет только цензура на цензуре, а уже сюда мебе потом скину все нормальные версии видюшек...

custom 54404011564864834379custom 523563904591620778231

18 Jul 2026, 04:29 UTC245 views12 reactionsread 10 August 2026

Все сигны отправлены, проверяйте лс!! Спасибо вам большое за поддержку🥳💖 Но если что, у меня есть заготовки для еще нескольких сигн! Так что их все еще можно купить, просто написано будет уже не от руки🙏

👾93

18 Jul 2026, 04:12 UTC222 views18 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

Такой вот второй варик🥹

12👾4🍓2

17 Jul 2026, 22:14 UTC206 views4 reactionsread 10 August 2026

Опять экспериментирую с макияжами и париками.. вотп, надеюсь, что вам зайдет🙏 И не думала, что когда-то буду делать сигны платными, извините.. но вас слишком много..

👾4

17 Jul 2026, 22:13 UTC194 views12 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

Вот с таким братанчиком вы можете получить сигну! Очень извиняюсь, но для всех отметившихся я не смогу сделать, так что теперь жто будет платно... 1 сигна - 50р. (в варианте с фото) 2 сигны - 100р. (В варианте с фото + чуть видоизмененный образ с кровякой💥) 2202206329748573 (сбер) Обязательно пишите свой ник при переводе, либо кидайте в комменты скрин с переводом и ником!!🙏

custom 52356390459162077827🙏31👾1

17 Jul 2026, 20:49 UTC137 views12 reactionsread 10 August 2026

Щя, подождите, родные!!! Сейчас закончу собираться, сфоткаюсь и уже буде все.

8custom 52356390459162077823🍓1

17 Jul 2026, 20:48 UTC140 views7 reactionsread 10 August 2026

Я 40 сигн не сделаю... ну а если платно будет, возьмёт кто?😓

custom 544071646721554065042🍓1

17 Jul 2026, 20:47 UTC154 views7 reactionsread 10 August 2026

ЧЕГО ВАС ТАК МНОГО, ОСОБЕННО В СОО КАНАЛА💥💥💥

3custom 54407164672155406502🍓1custom 53371516373392566461

17 Jul 2026, 20:38 UTC165 views15 reactionsread 10 August 2026

Для тех кто хочет сигны! Напишите в сообщения канал или в коммы под этим постом свой ник/имя🙏

😨8🙏4😎21

Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @kiki_cos_lox. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“🍓Канал Кики дебиловича🍓” (@kiki_cos_lox), 360 subscribers as measured 11 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/kiki_cos_lox.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.