Music — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 21 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 35% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
7 measurements spanning 38 days, net -21. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 541–568 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
14 Sept 2026, 21:58
544
-4
8 Sept 2026, 07:56
548
-3
29 Aug 2026, 13:42
551
-2
22 Aug 2026, 12:16
553
-5
15 Aug 2026, 18:27
558
-7
8 Aug 2026, 03:33
565
no change
7 Aug 2026, 15:11
565
first reading
Engagement
10 posts held, back to 16 March 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 10 posts for this entry, the most recent from 19 March 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
2m 25s
Average length
1m 13s
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
209 reactions across 10 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 48.8% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
102
48.8%
💔
53
25.4%
🍓
29
13.9%
🔥
13
6.22%
🥰
8
3.83%
🎉
3
1.44%
💘
1
0.478%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 10 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 209 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 10 most recent posts we hold, published 16 March 2026 to 19 March 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Дорогие Тики. Я думаю что вы уже давно поняли, что канал не совсем хорошо работает, и вообще был на протяжении нескольких месяцев пустым.
Все дело в том, что я единственная пока, кто выкладывала все это время здесь посты, но честно признаться - где-то с начала осени прошлого года мой интерес к КиКи начал угасать, собственно, как и канал.
И я к сожалению не в силах самостоятельно выкладывать здесь посты. У меня нет на…
⋆ִ ࣪𖤐 #bubble
Обновление официального Bubble Лисоль :
Лисоль поделилась, что первое фото было сделано, когда она училась во 2-м году старшей школы. тогда Сумин была на год старше, чем Кия сейчас!
это был день оценки стажеров и она исполняла « pink venom » от blackpink сама выбрав и купив костюм 👼🏻
Cr kii1kii1kr
𐙚 @KiiiKiii_gg 𔘓
⋆ִ ࣪𖤐 #statistics
Джиу и Суи слушают песню "Like I Do" Джо Квона и говорят о том,какая она отличная
Джиу: Здравствуйте! Я — Джиу из KiiiKii.
Суи: И я — Суи!
Джиу: Мы слышали, что наш сонбэним (старший коллега) Джо Квон возвращается с сольной песней спустя 8 лет!
Суи: Его новый трек называется «Like I Do». Давайте послушаем его прямо сейчас!
(Девушки надевают наушники и начинают слушать)
Джиу: О-о...
Суи: Ого!
Джи…
⋆ִ ࣪𖤐 #Photo
Кия, Хаым и Джию для Thursday Island Life
𐙚 @KiiiKiii_gg 𔘓
❤14🍓3🥰1
Signed ким линджи #hyper
Showing the 10 most recent of 10 posts we hold for @kiiikiii_gg. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“KiiiKiii 🐞| NEWS” (@kiiikiii_gg), 544 subscribers as measured 14 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/kiiikiii_gg.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
