Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Кигорус

Channel

Кигорус

@kigorus

2 usernames

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Cite this entry

118subscribers

-2 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001140909921
TypeChannel
Usernames@healer @kigorus
CreatedBetween 1 March 2017 and 30 April 2020— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded9 August 2026
Last confirmed live22 August 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 22 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/kigorus

Growth

1181201197 August 2026 — 120 subscribers7 August 2026 — 120 subscribers9 August 2026 — 120 subscribers20 August 2026 — 119 subscribers22 August 2026 — 118 subscribers7 August 202622 August 2026
5 measurements spanning 15 days, net -2. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 118–120 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
22 Aug 2026, 07:27118-1
20 Aug 2026, 18:46119-1
9 Aug 2026, 04:02120no change
7 Aug 2026, 13:44120no change
7 Aug 2026, 00:38120first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 12 December 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 4 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

175 reactions across 17 posts, in 29 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 34.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
6034.3%
custom 53686006248311710022011.4%
custom 5208601921845208724179.71%
custom 5447569083241357526158.57%
custom 5388727223832294197126.86%
🐳63.43%
🔥63.43%
🎅52.86%
custom 529448790612195304942.29%
❤‍🔥31.71%
🥴31.71%
21.14%
🍾21.14%
👨‍💻21.14%
💅21.14%
💘21.14%
🥰21.14%
custom 534608531963879285610.571%
10.571%
🎉10.571%
9 further kinds95.14%

Custom emoji. 6 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 175reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 12 December 2025 to 4 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

4 Jun 2026, 20:27 UTC851 views16 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Papier toilette de Kiev. Когда читая кремлевскую стенограмму на моменте признания в том, что Орешник никогда не применялся по-боевому на Украине, я услышал новость о "мирном" послании из Киева, то надеялся увидеть в дипломатических округлостях искреннее глубокое братское раскаянье за кровь и паразитное политиканство. Однако, вместо этого видна грубая провокация, безответная оторванность от реалий и отсутствие заботы

custom 520860192184520872464🔥3🥴2🤡1

27 Apr 2026, 14:38 UTC≈1,170 views10 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Как настроение, народ?)

4custom 544756908324135752641🥴1

22 Feb 2026, 11:29 UTC≈1,910 views12 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Лю, прости меня, ежели промысел мой принес тебе то, что отлично от того, что можно назвать счастьем. 😘

🐳6custom 520860192184520872441custom 53686006248311710021

17 Jan 2026, 18:46 UTC≈2,330 views8 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Форрест Гамп Одновременно тяжелый и легкий, смешной и печальный, тривиальный и философский в каждом своём проявлении, этот многослойный по настроениям, состояниям и смыслам фильм, в сочетании с блестящей игрой актеров, на мой взгляд, по праву считается классикой мирового кинематографа. Успех для главного героя — это путь наименьшего сопротивления или повышенного интереса, крепкая последовательность или ясность в ха

5👨‍💻2custom 52086019218452087241

14 Jan 2026, 13:28 UTC≈1,660 views9 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Я верю в жизнь вечную, а каждому вопрошающему об этом желаю, чтобы воля его была на Земле, как на Небе. После было есть и будет то, что было есть и будет до — вечность. #kigorus #вопросыотместных #очевидноже #жизнь #вечность

62custom 53887272238322941971

13 Jan 2026, 08:48 UTC≈1,550 views2 reactionsread 9 August 2026

О Smith & Wesson'ском праве. Почему то спрашивают моего виденья по ситуации в Венесуэле, хорошо, давайте попробуем взять её как событийный предлог к рассуждению о процессах и некоторых перспективах. Аннексия суверенитета Венесуэлы, на мой взгляд, является не чем иным, как подготовкой к крупномасштабному военному конфликту с Китаем. Также видится, что американцы в серьез грезят отбором у России статуса лидера по тер

custom 52944879061219530492

6 Jan 2026, 21:16 UTC895 views19 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Дорогие мои, с Рождеством Вас!

12❤‍🔥3💘1🔥1🥰1custom 52944879061219530491

4 Jan 2026, 08:51 UTC964 views6 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Poll

Лю, если выбор из двух, что из этого поможет делам быть всё лучше и лучше?

  1. Химия35%
  2. Мораль65%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

custom 538872722383229419731🤮1custom 52086019218452087241

1 Jan 2026, 13:45 UTC≈1,000 views16 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Лю.. Ну как ты? Как настроение?

custom 53686006248311710028custom 538872722383229419753

31 Dec 2025, 12:25 UTC989 views23 reactionsread 9 August 2026

2025 » 2026 Традиционно, неслучайными случайностями, каждому из нас уходящее оставляет то, что в сути своей никак нельзя назвать незаслуженным или произошедшим не для чего. Вот и пришло время 25му предоставить нас следующим вехам, позволяя всей четвертинки первого столетия третьего тысячелетия наконец назваться историей. Прогресс перманентно впечатляет и уже очевидно, что шквал технологических и культурных изменени

custom 536860062483117100296🎅4🍾2🎉1👍1

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @kigorus. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

4 Jan 2026, 08:51 UTCAnonymous Poll46 voters

Лю, если выбор из двух, что из этого поможет делам быть всё лучше и лучше?

  1. Химия35%
  2. Мораль65%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 12 December 2025 to 4 June 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 22 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Кигорус” (@kigorus), 118 subscribers as measured 22 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/kigorus.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.