Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for KIBERINDUSKA

Channel

KIBERINDUSKA

@kiberinduska

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

719subscribers

+2 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001970369636
TypeChannel
Username@kiberinduska
CreatedBetween 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 14 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/kiberinduska

Growth

7177197186 August 2026 — 717 subscribers6 August 2026 — 717 subscribers14 August 2026 — 719 subscribers6 August 202614 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 8 days, net +2. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 717–719 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Aug 2026, 17:14719+2
6 Aug 2026, 16:16717no change
6 Aug 2026, 08:19717first reading

Engagement

12 posts held, back to 6 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
48.7%
avg views ÷ 719 subscribers
Avg views / post
350
6 posts measured
Reaction rate
22.8%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
6
of 12 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 August 2026
Posts held12 (6 June 20265 August 2026)
Views total2,101
Reactions total480
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken6 Aug 2026, 16:16 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

1,028 reactions across 12 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 25.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 520872794048063965925825.1%
custom 519994863648560953723222.6%
🕊13713.3%
custom 520897357395526443812512.2%
custom 520398992153825236911811.5%
custom 5832391435634085121646.23%
💔535.16%
😍272.63%
😭80.778%
custom 522001446599447882260.584%

Custom emoji. 6 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 12 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,028reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 12 most recent posts we hold, published 6 June 2026 to 5 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 12 we hold a reading for · 8%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @kiberinduska. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 12 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 6 June 2026 to 5 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

5 Aug 2026, 08:36 UTC154 views58 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Невероятной красоты пиар от Cheeryep пришел ко мне! Здесь у нас целых три палетки теней и один хайлайтер☁️ По раскладке палетки на 16 оттенков вкуснейшие, а от мини-палеток я в любви! Внешнее и внутреннее оформление выше всяких похвал🖤 В общем, не могла не показать вам быстрый спойлер того, что буду обозревать, а с выходных ухожу в съемочный запой! Связь🤙🏽

custom 520897357395526443825custom 520872794048063965920custom 520398992153825236913

25 Jul 2026, 15:11 UTC357 views80 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

My true reaction: В суете чуть не забыла поделиться с вами огромной радостью, что получу посылочку от Cheeryep!! Совсем недавно запустился профиль бренда для российской аудитории, открывают официальный представительный офис, а следом на очереди и Girlcult!💋 К сожалению, команде уже не посчастливилось попасть в ситуацию со сгоревшими складами WB. Сейчас они сконцентрировались на ЗЯ – давайте же поддержим их начина

custom 520897357395526443836custom 520872794048063965925custom 519994863648560953719

24 Jul 2026, 12:04 UTC791 views80 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Video

🥀🥀Рассказываю подробнее про 🥀🥀новую коллекцию и делаю первый затест🥀 В кадре – все новинки из второй части коллекции «Клан роз и интриг» бренда VETACH.: 🤩Палетка теней «На острие пера» 🤩Прессованные румяна «Освальд» 🤩Кремовая помада «Король игры» Смотрим в деле на интересную холодно-драматичную палитру, румяна в необычной формуле и, конечно, изюминку коллекции – графитовую помаду! Признавайтесь, на какую вампирск

custom 520872794048063965940custom 583239143563408512123custom 519994863648560953717

23 Jul 2026, 09:43 UTC301 views99 reactions1 Starread 6 August 2026
Video

Ничто так не мотивирует на спидран по контенту, как наличие света 4-е сутки подряд😂 Всем огромное спасибо за поддержку под этим постом! Пока не успела все прочитать и всем ответить, но именно ваши теплые слова помогли мне взять себя в руки и вернуться к активным съемкам🫂 🤩За эти дни отсняла и смотрировала анонс новой коллекции VETACH. Уже рада положительному отклику! 🤩Отсняла один видео-туториал на макияж с новинк

custom 520872794048063965951custom 519994863648560953724custom 520398992153825236921custom 52200144659944788223

23 Jul 2026, 09:06 UTC156 views62 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @vetach_cosmeticsVideo

🥀🥀 🥀🥀❤️❤️❤️❤️ ❤️❤️🌹 ❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️ С возвращением в клан Равэлла, путники! Теперь он готов раскрыться во всей красе, и представить вам вторую часть вампирской коллекции🤩 Три новых продукта навеяны историями фигур, ранее оставшихся в тени: 🤩Палетка теней «На острие пера» – палитра, посвященная паре персонажей, Этельред и Освальду. Вдохновленная историей их благородной любви, палетка сочетает в себе пригл

custom 520872794048063965928custom 583239143563408512119custom 519994863648560953714custom 52039899215382523691

20 Jul 2026, 18:34 UTC342 views101 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Video

Посылка дошла, ура! Процесс пошел🥀

custom 520872794048063965954custom 520398992153825236927custom 519994863648560953720

14 Jul 2026, 19:22 UTC530 views187 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Неожиданный ночной и очень длинный пост😳 (Пишу, пока есть свет и связь!🙏) Крайне долго сомневалась, стоит ли писать этот пост. Но случилась моя очередная долгосрочная пропажа, и, наверное, стоит пояснить, what’s up. Тем более, что ранее я никогда не затрагивала эту тему в блоге, и особенно не пыталась на ней спекулировать🤨 К текущему дню ситуация такова: 1. В Крыму уже продолжительное время блэкаут и ЧС. Не хочу

🕊90💔53custom 519994863648560953736😭8

27 Jun 2026, 18:05 UTC497 views69 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Video

Бэкстейджевое! Отсняла первый макияж для обзора на Виверну, и вот этот бэк описывает его лучше некуда😂 То ли из-за долгого перерыва, то ли из-за моего ментального состояния (что вероятнее всего) рептилия пока тяжело мне приручается…🤔 В следующий раз мы с ней встретимся в бою графики, там еще посмотрим, кто кого!☺️ #tammytanuka

custom 520872794048063965931custom 520897357395526443822custom 519994863648560953716

22 Jun 2026, 08:11 UTC585 views76 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Video

🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩 🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩 🔤ияющая 🔤иверна 🔤олот Показываю, какое атмосферное предметное интро наснимала для грядущего обзора на новинку Тамми Тануки🐉 За макияжи возьмусь точно не раньше следующих выходных, но свотчи покажу пораньше❤️ Довольна получившимся видео, особенно, от того, что все снималось на телефон. Погружаюсь в чудеса мобильной съемки и пока вполне успешно🐸 А вы уже успели распробовать новинку? Как она в

custom 520398992153825236931custom 583239143563408512122custom 519994863648560953716😍4custom 52087279404806396593

15 Jun 2026, 19:05 UTC578 views55 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Поясните, что значат реакты с голубем мира, вы там меня уже отпеть успели за время моего отсутствия?👌

custom 520897357395526443827custom 519994863648560953714🕊11custom 52039899215382523693

15 Jun 2026, 18:57 UTC527 views85 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Дивная хищница ко мне доплыла🤭 Искусилась на долгожданную многими виверну – это будет моя вторая попытка знакомства с Тамми после спорной мурены Нуждаемся ли мы в полноценном ютуб обзоре на новенькую рептилию? Варианты ответа: – да – конечно да – абсолютно точно да Пишите в комментарии😉

🕊34custom 519994863648560953723custom 520897357395526443815custom 52039899215382523696custom 52087279404806396594custom 52200144659944788223

6 Jun 2026, 15:31 UTC≈1,470 views76 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Я думала, что уже все показала из вампирского обзора, а, оказалось, я не договорила😂 Образ из вступления и выводов, который мне ну очень понравился! Все-таки люблю я технику «негативной» стрелки: вроде бы, ничего сверхсложного, но как же эффектно выглядит💿 Макияж глаз выполнен всеми матовыми из палетки теней «Венец вечности»🤩, а сияние на подвижном веке – однушка теней «Мани»🤩 Также в оформлении лица: муссовые рум

custom 519994863648560953733😍23custom 520398992153825236916🕊2custom 52087279404806396592

Showing the 12 most recent of 12 posts we hold for @kiberinduska. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 3,150 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“KIBERINDUSKA” (@kiberinduska), 719 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/kiberinduska.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.