Posted without readable text

Channel
Мошенники на КиберСпорт
@kiber_scam
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
216subscribers
-1 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1002341540058 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @kiber_scam |
| Created | Between 1 September 2024 and 11 November 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 21 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 21 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/kiber_scam |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 21 Aug 2026, 13:09 | 216 | +1 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 18:27 | 215 | -2 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 03:31 | 217 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 17:46 | 217 | first reading |
Engagement
13 posts held, back to 11 November 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 13 posts for this entry, the most recent from 23 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Reaction mix
120 reactions across 11 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 59.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 71 | 59.2% | |
| ❤ | 13 | 10.8% | |
| 🔥 | 7 | 5.83% | |
| 🤣 | 7 | 5.83% | |
| 😁 | 5 | 4.17% | |
| 👎 | 4 | 3.33% | |
| 🤡 | 4 | 3.33% | |
| 💯 | 3 | 2.50% | |
| 👏 | 2 | 1.67% | |
| 🤷♀ | 2 | 1.67% | |
| 🏆 | 1 | 0.833% | |
| 🤔 | 1 | 0.833% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 13 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 120reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 13 most recent posts we hold, published 11 November 2024 to 23 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
- Stars received
- 1
- across the posts below
- Posts paid on
- 1
- of 12 we hold a reading for · 8%
- Most on one post
- 1
- single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @kiber_scam. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 13 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 11 November 2024 to 23 July 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Recent posts
Дальше не гнать .... А потом ОП и скрин выигрыша 🙃 Пост про НЕ ГНАТЬ удаляем и все чистенько Можно не ждать А потом ОП и скрин выигрыша , а про не ждать удаляем по крысиному НО мошенники у этих петухов все кроме них 😂
👍5❤2💯2😁1
Плохой совет от гуру🤡 ‼️Запомните , 2 аккаунта в одной БК на одни и те же данные это нарушение правил БК и повод заблокировать вас и ничего не выплачивать . Не слушайте советы всяких гур, им важно только одно , чтобы вы зарегились в бк по ИХ реферальной ссылке. Будьте внимательны Берегите свои деньги
👍6🤣4❤3👎1
Ещё один гуру-кибера , который легко делает 90000р в день и продает стратегию со скидкой за 1250р 😂😂😂 "Покупка отбивается одной ставкой."😱 Это по-моему гуру, которой превзошел всех предыдущих персонажей. ❓А как же любимые сказки гуру разных - "нельзя продавать стратегию , а то БК её узнает и заблокирует" 🧐 Как только видите Гур , которые в день по 20-30-50 тысяч поднимают в своих рассказах , а обучение или вип з…
🔥6🤡4❤2🤷♀1
#Мошенник'и всегда врут ❗️❗️❗️ Например петух-психолог написал 15го марта , что больше не продает обучение. На следущий день на Ютубе в комментах он легко предлагает это обучение в продажу . 29 марта в канале предлагает обучение за 5000. На вопрос почему человек , который в день выводит 20000р , в месяц 💰400000р ( пусть 20 дней он ставит), не может сдержать слово свое и продолжает продавать за 5000 свое УНИКАЛЬНОЕ…
👍16❤5😁3💯1🤷♀1
Внимание #мошенник ищет жертву . Как это все работает ? Из доверчивых подписчиков находится желающий. 😎МОШЕННИК даёт ставки совершенно не парясь о возможном проигрыше. Удастся поднять , человек скажет спасибо и побежит довольный рассказывать какой же честный канал , а мошенник получит свои % А если не удастся получить выигрыш❌, мошенник предложит купить вип , типа там все вернём или дать ещё денег самому мошеннику,…
👍6👏2
Это тот же самый петух #darksaidmk . #oneofthebest Продает сливных ботов в один Догон , а сам постоянно не может дать ставки в 2 Догона ( 3 матча) и добирает по 2 , по 4, а то и 7‼️ дополнительных матча , только бы написать плюс себе . По итогу выходит Догон на кеф 1,9 в 7 ставок. Это лютая дичь. Но если этого не замечать, то создаётся впечатление, что все ставки зашли максиму в 2 Догона. В 7 ставок Догон он вообще…
👍6🤣3❤1🤔1
Привет. Попросили мнение про 2 канала ( 1 и 2) скрин . Хочу на их примере показать логику , которая позволяет нам не вляпаться в мошенников или обманьщиков . Итак, при прочих странных факторах , как скрины , рефки и отсутвие минусов, внимание привлекает запись в канале на 3 скрине . Админ продает доступ в Вип-канал за 1000р, но также есть возможность попасть туда бесплатно , если вы зарегистрируйтесь по его реферальн…
👍3
😎Как работают мошенники ⬆️
Voice message, posted without a caption
👍5👎1🔥1
Внимание - это 3 мошенника , которые работают вместе. 1⃣ МорталНачало строит из себя честного и простого , через Ютуб и рекламу в телеге собирает подписчиков . Далее рекламирует своих подельников и тем самым переливает на них траффик. В своих лайвах может легко слить вам банк. 2⃣ Даймонд работает в канале по схеме Начала , много минусит , сливает банки, но это её не волнует. Пиарит своих ботов , которые по факту с…
👍15
Мошенники Если у кого-то есть инфа по ним пишите @FreeMK_helpbot
👍6👎2🏆1😁1
Showing the 12 most recent of 13 posts we hold for @kiber_scam. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 315,150 of 1,584,486entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 21 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Мошенники на КиберСпорт” (@kiber_scam), 216 subscribers as measured 21 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/kiber_scam.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.