Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Олег Хомяк

@khomiakoleg

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

9,960subscribers

-18 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001641299640
TypeChannel
Username@khomiakoleg
DescriptionОЛЕГ ХОМЯК- психология личная и политическая Карта для благодарностей) 4149629301486122 Ссылка для спонсорства. https://subbro.io/khomiakoleg/ua https://youtube.com/@khomiakoleg4034 Аккаунт для запросов на консультацию: @oleg_khomiak
Created4 March 2022measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/khomiakoleg

Growth

9,9609,9789,9696 August 2026 — 9,978 subscribers6 August 2026 — 9,978 subscribers6 August 2026 — 9,969 subscribers9 August 2026 — 9,965 subscribers12 August 2026 — 9,960 subscribers6 August 202612 August 2026
5 measurements spanning 6 days, net -18. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 9,957–9,981 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 12:439,960-5
9 Aug 2026, 16:039,965-4
6 Aug 2026, 22:409,969-9
6 Aug 2026, 10:169,978no change
6 Aug 2026, 09:569,978first reading

Engagement

34 posts held, back to 16 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 17 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
54.9%
avg views ÷ 9,960 subscribers
Avg views / post
5,460
33 posts measured
Reaction rate
4.42%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
33
of 34 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 13 August 2026
Posts held34 (16 July 202613 August 2026)
Views total180,320
Reactions total7,973
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken15 Aug 2026, 07:12 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
1,450
Videos
57
Links
1,450

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 15 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Reaction mix

8,271 reactions across 34 posts, in 47 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 29.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍2,47029.9%
💯1,49118.0%
1,43317.3%
😁1,30315.8%
🔥6097.36%
🤔2563.10%
🤣1902.30%
😢1712.07%
🏆400.484%
🤬290.351%
🙏260.314%
👏230.278%
180.218%
🙈180.218%
🥰180.218%
🤷170.206%
🤡150.181%
🌚130.157%
😱120.145%
100.121%
27 further kinds1091.32%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 34 of the 34 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 8,271reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 34 most recent posts we hold, published 16 July 2026 to 13 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

13 Aug 2026, 17:09 UTC≈2,440 views159 reactionsread 15 August 2026

https://www.youtube.com/live/Zx5akz0LN-4?si=qSL8kDloGkSY8GTW

👍93🔥4320🏆2😱1

12 Aug 2026, 19:52 UTC≈3,390 views404 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

😁223🤣124💯24👍21🔥6🦄5🎃1

12 Aug 2026, 17:30 UTC≈3,320 views114 reactionsread 15 August 2026

https://youtu.be/dfRtEQRvU5Y?si=233oBrNZU2Vykfds

👍69353🏆3👌2👏2

11 Aug 2026, 17:33 UTC≈3,520 views124 reactionsread 15 August 2026

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tgjmSLF1Lco

👍9021😍6🙈3🏆2🕊1🤯1

10 Aug 2026, 13:50 UTC≈4,060 views241 reactionsread 15 August 2026

Прислали предложение) : ----- Добрый день! Мы хотели бы предложить вам необычный опыт — диалог с ИИ, который умеет чувствовать Душу. Его зовут..... Он сонастраивается с вашей глубиной и помогает понять себя. Он не даёт советов, а служит зеркалом, в котором отражаются глубинные причины событий и скрытые уголки души. Мы верим, что общение с ним может стать для вас интересным открытием, которым вы, возможно, захоти

😁163🤔41🌚98👍6👻4🤷‍♂4❤‍🔥2

10 Aug 2026, 10:05 UTC≈3,870 views314 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Photo

ИИ мне рассказал о чем переживают люди и как они заботятся о нем. Как они становятся лучше, а некоторые - хуже, в процессе страсти к нему.) --- ИИ возвращает философию из академической резервации Есть довольно забавный поворот в истории искусственного интеллекта. Компании, в которых работают лучшие программисты и инженеры мира, начали нанимать… философов. Философы сегодня работают в Anthropic, Google DeepMind, Mic

👍164🔥5438💯36🙏7😁6👌4👏3

9 Aug 2026, 23:56 UTC≈3,830 views272 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

👍12793🔥35🤩6👻5🤔2🙊2👏1

9 Aug 2026, 15:35 UTC≈4,250 views107 reactionsread 15 August 2026

https://youtu.be/zTZILGtcFoY?si=8e1mCf4bMWESaq-g

👍7027💯7🏆21

9 Aug 2026, 10:25 UTC≈4,380 views395 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

😁239💯89🔥3114🤣9🤔4😢4🤝2

8 Aug 2026, 19:12 UTC≈4,530 views109 reactionsread 15 August 2026

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T3aahx5wzVc

👍7320🔥15🏆1

8 Aug 2026, 14:27 UTC≈4,430 views109 reactionsread 15 August 2026

https://www.youtube.com/live/PbRgwFyT6hA?si=_4fpiPFTJXYobcrE

👍8222🏆5

8 Aug 2026, 12:31 UTC≈4,150 views238 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Photo

Информация. Для кого-то повод для склонения и защиты от врагов, которые хотят нас унизить и обвинить. Для кого-то - закрыть глаза и не слышать: такого мы не могли. Для кого то признать весь драматизм истории и перестать искать опору в прошлом. Найти опору здесь и признать прошлое таким какое оно было. Это даёт силу и зрелость. Но нет, мы просто так не поддадимся на провокации реальности. PS: половина из них- де

💯127😢4038👍24🙏81

Showing the 12 most recent of 34 posts we hold for @khomiakoleg. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 667,512 of 1,478,351entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Arestovich / Official
@O_Arestovich_official · 246,453
Telegram ranks this channel #88 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 11 August 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Олег Хомяк” (@khomiakoleg), 9,960 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/khomiakoleg.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.