Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Nick Feldman

@feldman_nick

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

1,437subscribers

-1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001605434453
TypeChannel
Username@feldman_nick
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 31 March 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live11 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 11 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/feldman_nick

Growth

1,4371,4381,437.57 August 2026 — 1,438 subscribers7 August 2026 — 1,438 subscribers11 August 2026 — 1,437 subscribers7 August 202611 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 4 days, net -1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,437–1,438 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
11 Aug 2026, 18:211,437-1
7 Aug 2026, 22:021,438no change
7 Aug 2026, 21:241,438first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 25 April 2024the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 16 January 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
1m 40s
Average length
50s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

2,975 reactions across 20 posts, in 15 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 47.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍1,40647.3%
55518.7%
😁44414.9%
🔥2829.48%
🤔742.49%
🤯632.12%
🤬491.65%
👏351.18%
😐230.773%
🥰150.504%
😱110.37%
🤝70.235%
🫡70.235%
🤗30.101%
😍10.034%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,975reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 25 April 2024 to 16 January 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

16 Jan 2026, 08:09 UTC≈2,490 views211 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

На заставку смартфона :)

125👍53🔥23🥰8🤗1😱1

3 Dec 2025, 21:08 UTC≈3,440 views192 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Не треба захищати ніяку мову, а тим більше російську в Україні під час війни. Треба припинити тиснути на людей через мову, бо це шкодить природньому розповсюдженню української мови, навпаки не сприяє залученню до української мови.

👍148🔥2213🤝3😐3😁2🤗1

17 Oct 2025, 08:43 UTC≈4,040 views159 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Собирать не умею, фотографировать люблю. Жил бы в Карпатах, ходил бы за белыми грибами.

🔥75👍5522🥰3😁3👏1

31 Oct 2024, 09:27 UTC≈10,900 views401 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Вот чему нужно у меня учиться, а не чему-то другому 😁

😁291🔥57👍3512🫡3🥰2😍1

28 Aug 2024, 09:15 UTC≈12,000 views154 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Не умеют у нас про коммуникации думать, про адекватное взаимодействие с медиа на высоком современном уровне. Поэтому хамство и глупости сквозят со всех щелей. А всё ведь очень просто. Первое правило - нужно готовиться по сложным вопросам. Нельзя считать важный вопрос несложным. Нельзя создавать шаблон в ответ на шаблон. Нужна всегда чуть более сложная реакция, нежели шаблонная. Второе правило - формализм. Но форма

👍122🔥159🤝4👏2🫡2

24 Jun 2024, 09:24 UTC≈10,600 views246 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Если воры воруют у своей страны во время войны - это воры, которые за чужую страну. Тем, кто за нашу страну, такое будет делать западло во время войны. Коррупция - клей украинской государственности. Как часто вы слышали такой тезис? Он каждый раз про лояльность к воровству, про то, что государство не нужно менять. И каждый раз это про новый гвоздь в крышку гроба государственности. Тысячи гвоздей уже там. Кажды

👍19523👏18🔥9🤔1

21 Jun 2024, 15:30 UTC≈8,560 views95 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Телевизионная служба новостей информирует или новости воюющей страны

😁46🤯28😐7👏5🤔3🤬31👍1

7 Jun 2024, 15:50 UTC≈7,300 views81 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @forkoshserhii

На следующей неделе, запланировали с Николаем Фельдманом провести беседу на тему «вечности». Таким образом, можно будет обеднить три наших беседы в один, короткий цикл. «Точку входа» можно рассматривать как некие пролегомены к темам «времени» и «вечности».

👍5714🤔6🔥4

5 Jun 2024, 11:16 UTC≈6,800 views151 reactionsread 7 August 2026

От происходящего вокруг абсурда остается только смеяться. Госполитики нет, похоже, по поводу любых вопросов. Парламентская оппозиция никаких альтернатив не предлагает, а просто хайпят и садятся на качели всегда напротив, чтобы еще больше качать ситуацию. Видимо, в надежде, что лодку удастся раскачать до финала и когда лна перевернется, то удастся взять власть, ничего не меняя в системе. А система, между тем, такова,

👍107🤔23😱97👏2🤬2😁1

30 May 2024, 06:19 UTC≈7,910 views172 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

Хайп вокруг Портникова - это организованная технология. Стоило два дня подождать, как всё вылезло наружу. Вкратце, концепт выглядит таким - Петр Алексеевич Порошенко борется сегодня за каждый процент и в его стане принято решение отправить цепного пса Портникова в актуальную аудиторию. Уже на следующий день, пока свежа основная людская память, в сети распространяется меседж «Порошенко - не олигарх» 🤣 Петр Алексее

👍146😁18🤯4👏31

16 May 2024, 17:03 UTC≈5,260 views223 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

✌️

125👍55🔥21😁11👏4🥰2😐2🤗1

13 May 2024, 07:43 UTC≈5,640 views104 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Относительно токсичности наших людей - абсолютно известная история. Мы не умеем публично критиковать приемлемым образом. У нас в основном нечто среднее между яростным обвинением и жесткой критикой - получается просто хейт и оскорбления. Хорошим примером был когда-то прочитанная публикация про критику стартапов. Самым ярким комментарием был тупо хейт проекта от чувака, который был в жюри конкурса стартапов. Впоследст

👍9111🔥1😐1

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @feldman_nick. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,108,541 of 1,189,255entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Nick Feldman” (@feldman_nick), 1,437 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/feldman_nick.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.