Channel
@khomenok_anton
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
12subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 12 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003952128260 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @khomenok_anton |
| Description | Founder & CEO of X6 Visionary marketer. Sharing traffic insights. Advertising: @homka6 | @mediax6 🍀 @X6AGENCY — Media buying |
| Created | Between 1 April 2026 and 14 July 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 12 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/khomenok_anton |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 05:01 | 12 | no change |
| 12 Aug 2026, 00:32 | 12 | first reading |
18 posts held, back to 14 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 2 of 16 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 31 July 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 18 (14 July 2026 – 31 July 2026) |
| Views total | 142 |
| Reactions total | 2 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 12 Aug 2026, 05:01 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
8 reactions across 4 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 50.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 4 | 50.0% | |
| 🔥 | 2 | 25.0% | |
| 🤯 | 2 | 25.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 4 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 8reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 14 July 2026 to 31 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
ShortsMate – turn long videos into Shorts and Reels automatically ShortsMate takes your long-form video and cuts it down into short vertical clips ready for TikTok, Shorts, and Reels. What it does: • generates Shorts and Reels from long footage • adds subtitles automatically • finds the best moments in the video on its own • reformats everything to vertical •handles the editing without manual cutting Basically it…
According to Meta’s Q2 2026 earnings report, the company’s advertising revenue climbed 27% year-over-year to $59.36 billion The growth was driven by a 14% increase in ad impressions and a 12% rise in the average price per ad. Total revenue reached $60.8 billion, while net income declined 14% to $15.85 billion. The decrease was primarily attributed to higher legal expenses and continued heavy investment in AI infra…
Pinterest just hit 631M MAU and rolled out its own AI ad assistant Same story we've seen with Meta, Google Ads, and X: another major platform is baking an AI assistant directly into the ad manager. Now it's Pinterest's turn. The new tool builds ready-to-launch ad creatives automatically, pulling straight from a brand's organic pins. It doesn't just crop images – it analyzes visual patterns that already drove high …
ChatGPT Ads shipped the performance toolkit advertisers were waiting for OpenAI pushed a batch of updates that bring its Ads Manager close to Google Ads in capability. Conversion-optimized campaigns. Pick the Conversions objective and delivery shifts toward clicks likelier to convert. Worth being precise, since some write-ups got this wrong: it's oCPC, billing still runs per valid click. You optimize toward outcome…
YouTube is a search engine, and affiliates underuse that Three billion searches a day, second only to Google. A ranked video pulls clicks for months, while one riding recommendations dies in a week. Two signals decide everything: click-through rate and retention. Keywords tell the algorithm what the video covers, engagement tells it whether to keep showing it. The second matters more, and a video that gets clicked …
X is one of the few sources where a text post beats a production budget The algorithm ranks the take, not the visuals. Follower count barely affects reach, which means no editors, no shoots, no creative pipeline. 600M users, mostly US, Europe, Japan, Brazil, India and CIS, core age 25 to 34, heavy on developers, investors and crypto people. Trends surface here first and die within 12 to 48 hours. Competition stays…
Anthropic released Claude Opus 5 The company says the model gets close to Fable 5, their top tier, and beats it on some benchmarks. Opus 5 is built for everyday work rather than edge cases, and Anthropic positions it as more efficient than what came before. One detail worth noting: Anthropic didn't specifically train Opus 5 on cybersecurity, but its ability to find vulnerabilities improved anyway and now approaches…
41% of posts are now fully written by AI New data from Pangram Labs, which scanned over a million posts across LinkedIn, X, Reddit, Medium and Substack. The result: 41% of long-form LinkedIn posts (250+ words) read as fully AI-generated, plus another 30% of the shorter ones. LinkedIn is by far the most AI-saturated platform out there. X trails behind with 25% fully AI-written and another 23% AI-assisted. Generation…
Polymarket has landed inside Telegram It happened almost unnoticed, but the biggest event-betting platform moved straight into the messenger. It's a mini app called Predict, built on TON by the team at The Open Platform – the channel has already gathered 102K subscribers. What it consists of: • the same markets and same logic as Polymarket itself – sports, crypto, politics, news events • login through your Telegram…
❤1
Web-to-Telegram is quietly becoming the highest-retention funnel in affiliate The setup: instead of sending FB/TikTok traffic to a landing page, you route it through a Telegram bot or Mini App first, then to the offer. FB/TikTok – Mini App – offer. Why it works: • Less leakage. External landers ask for registration, and after one visit the user loses the link. Inside Telegram, auth is one tap – no logins, no passw…
3 Facebook Ads updates you need to catch before July ends – and why they're all the same story Every complaint about "Meta reshuffling the cabinet again" traces back to one thing: the rollout of Andromeda, Meta's new ranking engine. It reads user intent and funnel stage far deeper than before – around +5% conversions in beta, doubling by the next quarter. The catch: the smarter the algorithm gets, the less manual co…
How much X actually pays for content – and why some earns while others get almost nothing Last time I wrote (on our Russian channel) about X wiring Grok into its ad manager – the platform betting on AI to optimize how money moves through it. Here's the other side of that same machine: how X pays creators, and why the payouts look so random from the outside. Screenshots of $100, sometimes a few thousand, keep showin…
❤1
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @khomenok_anton. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 1,180,855 of 1,336,469entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Anton Khomenok” (@khomenok_anton), 12 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/khomenok_anton.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.