عنصرالمعالی کیکاووس بن اسکندر بن قابوس، ایز دت یو؟
😁3

Channel
@khodnevvis
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
68subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 9 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001725808079 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @khodnevvis |
| Description | چون غمت را نتوان یافت مگر در دل شاد ما به امید غمت خاطر شادی طلبیم @A_Fazeliy ناشناس: https://t.me/HarfChatBot?start=973100a1e977 |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 10 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 10 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/khodnevvis |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 10 Aug 2026, 01:02 | 68 | no change |
| 9 Aug 2026, 19:45 | 68 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 22 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 14 of 20 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (22 July 2026 – 8 August 2026) |
| Views total | 1,627 |
| Reactions total | 46 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 10 Aug 2026, 01:02 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 10 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
46 reactions across 14 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 73.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 34 | 73.9% | |
| 👍 | 8 | 17.4% | |
| 😁 | 3 | 6.52% | |
| 🔥 | 1 | 2.17% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 46reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 22 July 2026 to 8 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
عنصرالمعالی کیکاووس بن اسکندر بن قابوس، ایز دت یو؟
😁3
خودنویس
این پیام رو فوروارد کنید تصورم از اتاقتون رو بسازم
احتمالا یکی از تفریحات دوستداشتنی هر آدم کتابخونی اینه که ببینه به کدوم شخصیتهای رمانها نزدیکتره و به عبارت دیگه چه کسی او رو در عالم قصهها نمایندگی میکنه. یجورایی انگار دنبال وجود مثالی خودت میگردی* منم از روزی که این پست رو دیدم دورترین خیز زندگیمو برداشتم تا بالاخره برسم به این کتاب و آخرین شاهکار داستایفسکی و ببینم زیر قلم این نابغه شوریده چه تکههایی از من جامونده؟ جالبه. تصویرش اگرچه تماما بر من منطبق ن…
❤1
همچنانکه طبیب نزد بیمار میآید از طبیبِ اندرون میپرسد. زیرا ترا طبیبی هست در اندرون و آن مزاجِ توست که دفع میکند و میپذیرد. و لهذا طبیب بیرون از وی پرسد که «فلان چیز که خوردی چون بود؟ سبک بودی؟ گران بودی؟ خوابت چون بود؟» از آنچ طبیب اندرون خبر دهد طبیب بیرون بدان حکم کند. پس اصل آن طبیب اندرونست و آن مزاج اوست. چون این طبیب ضعیف شود و مزاج فاسد گردد از ضعف، چیزها بعکس بیند و نشانهای کژ دهد؛ شکر را تلخ گوید و سرک…
❤2
اینم قطعهٔ پازلمون باشه تا دربارهش حرف بزنیم... ؛) •برادران کارامازوف پ.ن: اسپویل نداره. نترسید.
عیسی (علیهالسلام) بسیار خندیدی. یحیی علیهالسلام بسیار گریستی. یحیی به عیسی گفت که «تو از مکرهای دقیق قوی ایمن شدی که چنین میخندی؟» عیسی گفت که «تو از عنایتها و لطفهای دقیق لطیف غریب حق قوی غافل شدی که چندینی میگریی؟» ولییی از اولیاء حق درین ماجرا حاضر بود، از حق پرسید «ازین هر دو کهرا مقام عالیترست؟» جواب گفت که «اَحْسَنُهُمْ بِیْ ظَنَّاً یعنی اَنَا عِنْدَ ظَنِّ عَبْدِیْ بِیْ من آنجایم که ظن بندهٔ من است. به…
❤6
این بریدههایی که از «فیه ما فیه» عزیز میذارم صرفا از روی حظبردن و خوشایند مذاق نیست، که اگه این بود باید الف تا یاء کتاب رو رونویسی میکردم. مطلبی و حلقه اتصالی رو دنبال میکنم که شاید از بیرون هم پیدا باشه. اگه نبود امیدوارم بشه اون بحثی که قولش رو دادم بنویسم و اونموقع شفافتر شه احتمالا.
❤4
در سرشت آدمی همه علمها در اصل سرشتهاند که روح او مُغیّبات را بنماید چنانک آب صافی آنچ در تحت اوست از سنگ و سفال و غیره و آنچ بالای آنست همه بنماید عکس آن. در گوهر آب این نهاد است بیعلاجی و تعلیمی. لیک چون آن آمیخته شد با خاک یا رنگهای دیگر آن خاصیّت و آن دانش ازو جدا شد و او را فراموش شد. حقّ تعالی انبیا و اولیا را فرستاد همچون آب صافی بزرگ که هر آب حقیر را و تیره را که درو درآید از تیرگی و از رنگ عارضی خود برهد؛…
❤2
اگه کنکور فلسفه نبود، جداً مینشستم و با مطالعه براتون وارد بحثِ فقه و دین فور دامیز میشدم. بسیار جالبه. و خیلی گرههای پیدا و پنهانی برای مذهبیها و غیرمذهبیها هست که از گلآلود بودن اون زیرمیرا ناشی میشه...
👍3
نام اثر: سایهٔ جنگ...
رابطهم با خدا عجیب شده. نمیدونم شایدم از قبل همینطوری بوده و فقط نمیخواستم قبول کنم. مثل دو تا پیرمرد دوقلوی خسته شدیم که او البته چند دقیقه بزرگتره. ته قلبمون همدیگه رو دوست داریم اما بیشتر اوقات حوصله هم رو نداریم. توی جمع و مهمونیا محترمانه رفتار میکنیم و بعضا خیلی هم رو تحویل میگیریم. اما تو خلوت هر کدوم میریم پی زندگی خودمون و ترجیح میدیم اجازه بدیم اون یکی تنهایی با مسائلش کنار بیاد. من گلایهای ندارم. ا…
❤3
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @khodnevvis. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 732,375 of 1,480,688entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“خودنویسـ...” (@khodnevvis), 68 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/khodnevvis.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.