Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Химки без прикрас

Channel

Химки без прикрас

@khimki_without_filters

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

320subscribers

+1 since we began measuring on 2 September 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002339555231
TypeChannel
Username@khimki_without_filters
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded2 September 2026
Last confirmed live12 September 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/khimki_without_filters

Growth

319320319.52 September 2026 — 319 subscribers2 September 2026 — 319 subscribers12 September 2026 — 320 subscribers2 September 202612 September 2026
3 measurements spanning 9 days, net +1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 319–320 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Sept 2026, 07:19320+1
2 Sept 2026, 23:30319no change
2 Sept 2026, 23:17319first reading

Engagement

6 posts held, back to 28 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
19.7%
avg views ÷ 320 subscribers
Avg views / post
63.0
6 posts measured
Reaction rate
5.78%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
6
of 6 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 5 of 6 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 September 2026
Posts held6 (28 August 20262 September 2026)
Views total378
Reactions total19
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken2 Sept 2026, 23:30 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
4m 44s
Average length
1m 35s

Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

19 reactions across 5 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 57.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🤬1157.9%
👍315.8%
🤮210.5%
🤡15.26%
🤣15.26%
🤯15.26%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 5 of the 6 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 19 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 6 most recent posts we hold, published 28 August 2026 to 2 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

2 Sept 2026, 11:49 UTC44 views1 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Video

Цветы на фоне мусора или новый вид благоустройства. Пока город, в прямом смысле слова, утопает в мусоре, администрация на круге у станции «Химки» высаживает новые цветы. А цветы на фоне неубранного мусора вокруг как-то по-особенному смотрятся? В чем тайный смысл такой цветочной помойки? Кроме как когнитивного диссонанса, наблюдая такую картину каждый день, ничего испытывать невозможно! В небольшом городке на цент

🤡1

31 Aug 2026, 12:51 UTC66 views2 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

Сколько еще Химки будут превращать в помойку??? А ведь завтра по Ленинскому проспекту здесь дети пойдут в школу!!!! Администрация Химок, вам не стыдно??? 👉🏻 Подписаться на канал #Химки #Химкибезприкрас #благоустройствоХимки #КрысыХимки #плохаяуборкамусораХимки #КарповХимки #МБУОГХХимки #Янабаев #АдминистрацияХимки #АндрейВоробьев #Бастрыкин #ИннаФедотова

🤬2

31 Aug 2026, 10:47 UTC67 views3 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

Позорное 1 место по количеству жалоб в Добродел опять у Химок за август. Конец месяца, а это значит время нашей любимой рубрики: кто первый по количеству жалоб в Добродел за август 2026 по Подмосковью. И опять позорное 1- место у Химок. Ну это и не удивительно, когда в городе по 8 дней не убирают мусор у центрального парка. Подробности по ссылке (Архив показателей количества жалоб в Добродел по Химкам: январь / фе

🤮2🤣1

29 Aug 2026, 16:30 UTC49 viewsread 2 September 2026
Forwarded from @RealKhimkiPhoto

🔴🔴🔴🔴😃❤ ⚡️В Химках свыше десяти тысяч местных жителей требуют разъяснений! 🔥 В городском округе готовятся к демонтажу так и не заработавшего торгового центра «Торжок», расположенного на МКАД. На его месте планируют возвести жилой комплекс. Жители ЖК «Юбилейный» выражают серьёзное беспокойство из-за слишком близкого расположения будущей стройки. Кроме того, их тревожит возможное изменение привычной схемы движения, к

28 Aug 2026, 15:06 UTC93 views8 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Video

Сколько еще администрация будет делать из химчан идиотов и превращать город в помойку, рассказывая и показывая в соцсетях, как МБУ «ОГХ» отлично убирает улицы? Химки утопаю в мусоре около центрального парка и никому до этого нет дела! Химчанам и так сойдет? А если кому что не нравится, уберите сами, как снег этой зимой? 👉🏻 Подписаться на канал #Химки #Химкибезприкрас #благоустройствоХимки #КрысыХимки #плохаяубор

🤬7👍1

28 Aug 2026, 10:58 UTC59 views5 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Forwarded from @Antonina_KhimkiPhoto

Эти от скромности не умрут 📚 На сайте Администрации городского округа Химки выложили проект Решения Совета депутатов по кандидатурам на Доску почета. Доска почёта — это большой высокий стенд, расположенный с правой стороны от входа в здание Администрации на ул. Московская, 15. 🏆 Выбирать кандидатов на Доску почёта — это традиционная ежегодная процедура, можно сказать, ритуал накануне Дня Города. Будучи депутатом, я

👍2🤬2🤯1

Showing the 6 most recent of 6 posts we hold for @khimki_without_filters. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Химки без прикрас” (@khimki_without_filters), 320 subscribers as measured 12 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/khimki_without_filters.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.