5 measurements spanning 22 days, net +5. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 111–119 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
29 Aug 2026, 09:19
118
+4
21 Aug 2026, 18:48
114
+2
14 Aug 2026, 09:14
112
-1
9 Aug 2026, 06:16
113
no change
7 Aug 2026, 07:34
113
first reading
Engagement
17 posts held, back to 2 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
39.5%
avg views ÷ 118 subscribers
Avg views / post
46.6
17 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.52%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
17
of 17 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 13 of 17 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026
Posts held
17 (2 August 2026 – 7 August 2026)
Views total
793
Reactions total
25
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
9 Aug 2026, 06:16 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Reaction mix
25 reactions across 13 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 92.0% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
23
92.0%
👍
2
8.00%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 25reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 2 August 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
ایلات اصلی کورد لک سلسله و دلفان میشن. طوایف وابسته یعنی باجلان و بیرانوند که کرمانج بودند و ابتدا از موصل به سرپل ذهاب آمده و بعد گروهی از آنان به لرستان رفته اند.
در تمام منابع قدیمی ایل کولیوند لک، نام کلی یا کولی داشته است. امروزه برای تغییر لفظی آن تبدیلش کردن قلی وند و حتی بعضی مدعی میشن قلی وند خزل از همین ایله.. اما این درست نیست و فقط تشابه اسمیه.
جدی که برای کلیوند معرفی شده جد شجره ای قلی وند خزل نیست و اص…
عزیرانی که دنبال کتاب های تاریخی هستید . بهترین کانالیه که خیلی کتاب های تاریخی داره.
مثلا برای کتاب های تاریخی راجب کوردها. کلمه کرد یا کردستان. ایلات. طوایف. ایلام. را در قسمت جستجو کانال مورد نظر که فرستادم بزنید.
در آخر بگم کتاب های راجب کوردها قطعا قطعا در جاهایی سانسور شدند .
مثلا من نمونه عربی کتاب فصول فخریه را دیدم از دژ و قلعه کوردها که تسخیر کردن گفته. آما همان قسمت به فارسی نوشته عشایر کرد و خواسته کرد را…
نامنامه ایلات ایران منوچهر ستوده و فرهنگ بورکه ایی کوردی، کرماج را همان کرمانج دانسته است.
کرماج نام دهی خزل نشین در کرمانشاه بوده است.
امروزه گویا نامش عوض شده است.
مثلا در سال ۱۳۰۵خزل ۳۰۰خانور ازش ماند. و یکی که نمیدانه فک میکنه خزل جمعیتی نداشته است.در تاریخ بختیاری مهم ترین سربازان پشتکوه خزل بودن اونم۴۰۰جنگجوی سواره، دیگه نگفته سواره ملکشاهی یا شوهان یا فلان.
بیشترین جمعیت ایلامی پناهنده دوره والیان ،الان در قصر شیرین و سرپل ذهاب تا گیلانغرب،مایشت،کلیایی،سنقر، خزل هستند و جمعیت زیادی دارند.
مهاجرت های عراق هم همه طوایف ایلام بودند.
جعفر خیتال نیز تأیید میکند که زبان خزلهای ساکن پشتکوه کردی است.
نویسنده میگوید در دهه ۱۹۷۰ میلادی از یکی از بزرگان خزل در بغداد پرسید: «آیا شما در اصل عرب هستید؟» او پاسخ داد: «در حقیقت ما از کردها هستیم، اما شرایط زندگی باعث شده درباره اصل و نسب خود چیزی نگوییم و این را از روی احتیاط انجام میدهیم.»
در اینجا چرا خزل از ترس هویت خود را پنهان کرده اند و شجره عربی ساخته اند دلیلش همان سرکوب های خونین دوران زندیه ت…
اما نظر دیگر مورخان فیلی عراق راجب خزل
خزلها از طایفههای بزرگ و مستقل هستند که در نواحی شیروان، چرداول، ایلام، و گیلان غرب، هلیلان و نهاوند زندگی میکنند. محمدحسنخان نوشته است که محل سکونت آنان در مناطقی مانند خیبران، کوه کرد، بیگکرما، مزارع زرینه و جَملوخ بوده و از شیعیان به شمار میآیند.
جورج کرزن نوشته است که خزلها را در کرمانشاه دیده، اما آنان را با نام «غزال» معرفی کرده است. همچنین نویسنده نسخه خطی «الیام…
در لهجه کردی خراسان به طایفه خزائی میگن هیزولی یا خزوئی
خزائی های خراسان و ماکو خود را کورد کرمانج می دانند.
ایل هیزولانلو در بتلیس و دیاربکر و موش هم ساکنندو خزوئی یا خازالی از آنان در گذشته دور مستقل شده اند اما هم ریشه اند.
بنابرین چه خزو. چه حزو. چه خیز و چه هیز.
یه ریشه دارند گاهی با (خ) بیان شدن گاهی با (هه)تلفظ شدن.
این خاصه زبان کوردیه خیلی کلمات( خ )را هه تلفظ میکنند مثلا خیز که میشه هیز. مثل خور که میشه …
❤1
Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @khezelkurdi. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 29 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“کوردخزل Khezel kurd” (@khezelkurdi), 118 subscribers as measured 29 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/khezelkurdi.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.