2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 196–198 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
16 Sept 2026, 20:22
197
no change
16 Sept 2026, 19:47
197
first reading
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 12 September 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
29.1%
avg views ÷ 197 subscribers
Avg views / post
57.4
20 posts measured
Reaction rate
4.84%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
20
of 20 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 19 of 20 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 16 September 2026
Posts held
20 (12 September 2026 – 16 September 2026)
Views total
1,147
Reactions total
52
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
16 Sept 2026, 20:22 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
15
Videos
8
Links
8
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 16 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Reaction mix
52 reactions across 19 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 44.2% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
23
44.2%
👍
14
26.9%
👏
4
7.69%
😁
4
7.69%
🤣
4
7.69%
💯
2
3.85%
🔥
1
1.92%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 52 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 12 September 2026 to 16 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
یک مثلی هست تو قم میگن
آدم زیر ک.. بره زیر حرف نره.
کسایی که میخوان مرد بشن باید این کورس رو بگذرونن، مضمون اینکه به حدی باید تو رفتارت دقیق باشی کسی چیزی بهت نگه و اگر گفت زیر بار شق اول که نمیری زیر بار این حرفم نباید بری و بزنی کون طرفو پاره کنی.
قشر بندی روشنفکر و دکتر و مهندس و این دست کساشیر در جهت گرفتن امتیاز اضافی از جامعه رو خودشون نمیتونن محقق کنن مینیون هاشون میکنند.
آدم حسابی به رفتارشه نه طبقه اجتماعیش و سمت شغلیش.
مال هر گورستانی و نوه هر کسی باشی شخصا مسئول رفتارتی هر خری میخوای باشی باش.
«در باب هویتیابی روشنفکرانه»
تا به حال چند باری دربارۀ «روشنفکران» صحبت کردیم. البته شاید برای خود روشنفکران خوشایند نباشه که موضوعِ تحلیل قرار بگیرند. روشنفکران خودشون رو «دیوان عالیِ اخلاق و نقد جامعه» میدونند؛ یعنی خودشون رو بالاترین مرجع برای داوری دربارۀ امور و مسائل اجتماعی و تاریخی و سیاسی میدونند، اینکه حالا خودشون مورد قضاوت قرار بگیرند مثل محاکمۀ قضاتِ دیوان عالیه. اما اتفاقاً «روشنفکران» یکی از سوژه…
هرجا انسان رو دیدید دارن دسته بندی میکنن میخوان ببرنشون سمت سلاخ خونه.
مثلا ما فلان ها از بقیه یه سر و گردن بالاتریم.
یا ما فلان ها همیشه مورد ظلم واقع شدیم.
اینها پایه روایت برای فساد آتی هست.
ما نداریم فقط من داریم.
من شخصا مسئول رفتار و کردار خودمم و السلام فلان کسک تو فلان جای دنیا که با من اشتراک قومی یا رشته تحصیلی یا هر چیز دیگه داره به من ربطی نداره حتی اینکه از یک پدر و مادر زاده شده باشیم .
من،من هستم و هرگ…
در روایتی میخوندم که یادم نیست کجا بود.
ما شمار را از خاک آفریدیم و سپس در زمین پراکنده کردیم.
صبح دیدم راست میگه من آدمی رو در قوچان دیدم که مطابق اون رو در جیرفت دیدم و مطابق اینها رو در تبریز دیدم و عینا در دزفول دیدم.
من یه نوکیا n8 دارم که همیشه با اون تو جلسات و جاهایی که میرم شرکت میکنم و اصلا تا حالا فکر نکردم این گوشی آبروی منه یا هرچی.
امروز که قیمت آیفون هارو دیدم ۱میلیارد واقعا شوکه شدم.
اگر من یک میلیارد اضافی داشتم اول یه کوله ۷۵ لیتری دیوتر میخریدم نزدیک ۷۵ میلیون یه داس هم مجید ساخته تو کارگاه اسواروگ تخم نکردم تا حالا ازش بپرسم اونم حتما میخریدم ۷۰۰ تومنشم میدادم خانومم میگفتم من بیشتر احتیاج ندارم.
یکی از چیزهایی که من خیلی زود در بین عوام یاد گرفتم بازی بود و انصافا نقشه خوان درجه یکی بودم اگر بازیکن درجه یکی نشدم.
خیلی در پایین شهرها و خانواده ضعیف(فکری نه مالی) ذکر این مسئله میشه که طرف چه غرضی داره ؟و به این نتیجه میرسن همیشه یک غرضی هست و طبق اون یه آرانژمان مثل امیر قلعه نوعی میکنن و گاها تا صد سال ترافیک اون خانواده ها قفل میشه.
من خودم بزرگ که شدم و یه سری آدم حسابی دیدم فهمیدم،اوووو اینها کار درست رو ا…
یکی از رفقا میگفت رفتم دادگاه زنه گفت طرف مقابلم با دعا نویسش میاد.
دعا نویس پشت درب ورد و اوراد میخونه من زبونم بند میاد.
خلاصه جنگ ستارگانه یه قسمت روی زمین باید بجنگی یه قسمت با موکلین طرف مقابل.
مهمترین قسمت این دنیا اونجاس که یا همه باهم حالشون خوبه یا همه با هم حال خرابی میکشن.
فقط آدم های خام و مزاحم میتونن تنهایی خوشحال باشن.
❤2👏1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @khanpaulsartreofficial. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“khanpaulsartre” (@khanpaulsartreofficial), 197 subscribers as measured 16 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/khanpaulsartreofficial.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.