alo gaiss
Signed y

Channel
@khalstasnja
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
12subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 13 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001487908299 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @khalstasnja |
| Created | 2 June 2021 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 13 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 14 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/khalstasnja |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Aug 2026, 15:34 | 12 | no change |
| 13 Aug 2026, 23:00 | 12 | first reading |
16 posts held, back to 2 June 2021 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 16 posts for this entry, the most recent from 1 May 2022. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
alo gaiss
Signed y
Sticker, posted without a caption
suka duka dalam persahabatan uda kita rasain bertiga, ada masalah di selesai in bareng. paling ga terima kalo ada yang nyakitin salah satu diantara kita, tapi bodoh banget milih pasangan. mereka, i've said this a lot. but i still want to say it, i thank you very much. thank you for accepting me as your friend, i am lucky to have a friend like you. i just want you to stay here with senja, and we keep the promise we ma…
di tanggal 10 desember 2020 aku bertemu dengan jevran dan ditanggal 5 januari aku bertemu langit, eh ga dulu nama mereka eza sama alvaro. awal nya kita canggung banget, aku cari cara buat kita ada topik. ga nyangka juga kalo kita ini sefrekuensi, mulai dari gila nya (tapi yang gila mereka bukan aku) sampe selera humor. jujur dari sekian banyak nya temen yang aku punya, aku cuma bisa terbuka sama mereka. i mean kaya a…
beruang putih sih, paling cakep valid.
w/ ma babe
Sticker, posted without a caption
w/ circle
Sticker, posted without a caption
jangan sengaja hilang agar dicari, karna prinsip saya apapun yang hilang akan saya ganti
File, posted without a caption
w/ ma twins.
Signed khm. 𝐉
Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @khalstasnja. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 1,122,272 of 1,480,688entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@khalstasnja named 2 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ㅤㅤㅤ” (@khalstasnja), 12 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/khalstasnja.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.