Local community — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 63% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
33 measurements spanning 42 days, net -32,646. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 36,435–78,875 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 33
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
17 Sept 2026, 09:01
41,332
-180
15 Sept 2026, 06:21
41,512
-767
13 Sept 2026, 12:19
42,279
-213
11 Sept 2026, 18:14
42,492
-291
9 Sept 2026, 06:59
42,783
-340
6 Sept 2026, 01:01
43,123
-153
3 Sept 2026, 22:37
43,276
-160
2 Sept 2026, 12:43
43,436
-190
1 Sept 2026, 10:47
43,626
-162
31 Aug 2026, 13:38
43,788
-874
30 Aug 2026, 14:44
44,662
-1,002
29 Aug 2026, 16:12
45,664
-869
28 Aug 2026, 15:04
46,533
-975
27 Aug 2026, 15:33
47,508
-824
26 Aug 2026, 13:36
48,332
-1,237
25 Aug 2026, 13:17
49,569
-530
24 Aug 2026, 15:37
50,099
-1,309
23 Aug 2026, 00:07
51,408
-1,673
21 Aug 2026, 11:45
53,081
-841
20 Aug 2026, 09:43
53,922
first reading
Engagement
44 posts held, back to 9 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 89 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
39.6%
avg views ÷ 41,332 subscribers
Avg views / post
16,400
15 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.098%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
17
of 44 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 22 September 2026
Posts held
44 (9 July 2026 – 22 September 2026)
Views total
245,810
Reactions total
242
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
23 Sept 2026, 03:47 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
500
Videos
111
Links
271
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 23 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Video runtime
1m 16s
Average length
19s
Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
608 reactions across 40 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 23.2% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
141
23.2%
🎉
135
22.2%
👍
123
20.2%
🔥
119
19.6%
👏
90
14.8%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 40 of the 44 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 608 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 44 most recent posts we hold, published 9 July 2026 to 22 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Advertising
Ad load
9.09%
4 of 44 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
0
none — marked by hashtag only
Median views · ads
15,900
over 4 measured posts
Median views · rest
7,970
over 36 measured posts
An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.
This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor. A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.
Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.
Measured over the 44 most recent posts we hold, published 9 July 2026 to 22 September 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.
🚨 Выжил под винтами: рыбаку из Хабаровского края зашили голову
На лодке шли двое — 39-летний Вячеслав из Хабаровска и 22-летний Ларион из Тахты.
В Ульчском районе в них влетел катер Рыбоохраны. Старший ушёл под воду и попал под винты — насмерть.
Молодому разнесло голову. По данным Amur Mash — сотрясение и сломанная ключица.
Сестра говорит: Лариона вертолётом увезли в Николаевск, раны зашили. Лежит в хирургии, пок…
Десятки российских туристов заразились ковидом в Таиланде
В стране началась вспышка COVID-19. За последний месяц — 65 тысяч заболевших.
При этом больницы Таиланда часто ставят туристам диагноз «бактериальная пневмония», чтобы не портить эпидемиологические показатели страны, пишут СМИ.
В Хабаровске лжеремонтник балконов развёл четырёх клиентов на 300 тысяч
В Хабаровске 42-летний мужчина получил условный срок за обман клиентов, которым обещал установить кондиционеры и отремонтировать балконы. От его действий пострадали четыре человека, лишившиеся в общей сложности более 300 тысяч рублей, сообщили в прокуратуре Хабаровского края.
В 2024–2025 годах хабаровчанин принимал заказы на покупку и монтаж ко…
Ваш голос — это ваша свобода. Свобода выбирать, как жить, кого поддерживать и в каком мире растить детей. Когда вы приходите на выборы, вы защищаете мир. Мир начинается с решения. Решения, что важнее шумных обещаний — спокойствие улиц, безопасность дома и уверенность в завтрашнем дне.
Без вашего участия эти решения принимают другие. Без вашего голоса свобода остаётся словом. Вы не просто отмечаете бюллетень. Вы гов…
🚨 Три человека погибли в ДТП в Хабаровском крае
Honda Fit выехала на встречку и врезалась в Toyota Probox.
Погибли водители обеих машин и пассажир Toyota.
Обстоятельства выясняет Госавтоинспекция.
В Хабаровском крае октябрь, ноябрь и декабрь могут быть теплее обычного
В Хабаровском крае осень может пойти не по привычному сценарию. Температурный фон в октябре, ноябре и декабре прогнозируют выше многолетних значений, сообщает Росгидромет.
Для Хабаровска, например, в октябре среднюю температуру ожидают примерно на 1,4 градуса выше нормы. Сам по себе этот месяц тёплым не станет — речь именно о среднем показателе…
Работник золотодобывающего предприятия в Хабаровском крае пытался присвоить драгметаллы на сумму более 4 млн рублей
47‑летний иностранец, трудоустроенный бригадиром в одном из золотодобывающих предприятий региона, имел доступ к промывке золотосодержащего концентрата на старательском лотке. Он дожидался момента, когда рабочие покидали помещение, систематически изымал небольшие объемы сыпучих веществ и выносил их в па…
Мир — это не политическая позиция, а необходимость.
Когда о мире говорят люди с разными политическими взглядами, это говорит об одном: общество устало от напряжения, страха и неопределённости.
Мир — не лозунг. Это базовое условие нормальной жизни. 20 сентября выбери Мир и Свободу! Сайт кандидата: ermakov2026.vercel.app
В Хабаровске перед судом предстанет мужчина, обвиняемый в незаконных организации и проведении азартных игр
Следственным отделом по Центральному району города Хабаровска следственного управления Следственного комитета Российской Федерации по Хабаровскому краю и Еврейской автономной области завершено расследование уголовного дела в отношении 39-летнего жителя Еврейской автономной области. Он обвиняется в совершении пр…
В Хабаровском крае власти уже в пятый раз пытаются уволить чиновницу, которая следит за их тратами — суд четырежды признавал увольнения незаконными, а бюджет потерял более 1 млн рублей
Елена Петровская устроилась главным специалистом-контролёром-ревизором в финансовый отдел администрации района имени Полины Осипенко. Должность обязывает её следить за расходами муниципальных органов — и это явно не понравилось началь…
❤5🎉3👍1👏1🔥1
Showing the 12 most recent of 44 posts we hold for @khabarovsx6. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 111 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
2
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
2
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
0
vacant every time we have ever looked
@khabarovsx6 named 2 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Evidenced gone
We ourselves saw each of these resolve to a real page at some point before it went vacant — a genuine, evidenced change, not an inference from absence.
@krasnodar_6 named in 7 posts, 8 August 2026 – 1 September 2026 · confirmed gone 28 August 2026 (two independent sightings — see how we confirm a dead handle)evidenced
@tyumen_2 named in 7 posts, 8 August 2026 – 1 September 2026 · confirmed gone 6 September 2026 (two independent sightings — see how we confirm a dead handle)evidenced
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Телеблог Хабаровск ( Хабаровский край ) комсомольск на амуре амурск советская гавань николаевск бикин реклама объявления афиша” (@khabarovsx6), 41,332 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/khabarovsx6.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
