Local community — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 62% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
62 measurements spanning 97 days, net +19,023. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2,283–42,177 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 62
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
11 Nov 2026, 12:57
25,915
-128
9 Nov 2026, 18:50
26,043
-161
8 Nov 2026, 07:48
26,204
-181
7 Nov 2026, 02:09
26,385
-242
5 Nov 2026, 23:07
26,627
-102
4 Nov 2026, 19:46
26,729
-128
3 Nov 2026, 16:17
26,857
-229
2 Nov 2026, 13:36
27,086
-57
1 Nov 2026, 16:36
27,143
-375
31 Oct 2026, 13:00
27,518
-305
30 Oct 2026, 15:28
27,823
-348
29 Oct 2026, 13:48
28,171
-437
28 Oct 2026, 10:07
28,608
-194
27 Oct 2026, 08:55
28,802
-247
26 Oct 2026, 07:29
29,049
-182
25 Oct 2026, 07:16
29,231
-209
24 Oct 2026, 03:40
29,440
-215
23 Oct 2026, 06:31
29,655
-303
22 Oct 2026, 07:50
29,958
-204
20 Oct 2026, 22:20
30,162
first reading
Engagement
75 posts held, back to 7 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 177 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
21.4%
avg views ÷ 25,915 subscribers
Avg views / post
5,550
14 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.268%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
15
of 75 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 13 November 2026
Posts held
75 (7 July 2026 – 13 November 2026)
Views total
77,733
Reactions total
208
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
13 Nov 2026, 15:20 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
354
Videos
9
Links
200
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 13 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Reaction mix
1,136 reactions across 69 posts, in 14 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 20.5% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
233
20.5%
👏
222
19.5%
🔥
217
19.1%
🎉
216
19.0%
👍
210
18.5%
💯
8
0.704%
🤩
8
0.704%
❤🔥
6
0.528%
😍
5
0.44%
🤣
4
0.352%
🥰
3
0.264%
😁
2
0.176%
👎
1
0.088%
💩
1
0.088%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 69 of the 75 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,136 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 75 most recent posts we hold, published 7 July 2026 to 13 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Advertising
Ad load
8.00%
6 of 75 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
0
none — marked by hashtag only
Median views · ads
5,120
over 6 measured posts
Median views · rest
5,260
over 63 measured posts
An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.
This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor. A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.
Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. They are printed side by side with the count behind each rather than as a ratio: an ad and an ordinary post are not otherwise matched — for topic, for length, for hour of day — so the gap between them is a description of two groups and not the effect of one being an ad.
Measured over the 75 most recent posts we hold, published 7 July 2026 to 13 November 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 15 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
На Кубани установили новые дорожные камеры
Комплексы круглосуточно контролируют скорость, использование ремней безопасности и световых приборов. В Кавказском районе камера на 133-м км трассы Краснодар — Кропоткин — граница Ставропольского края, у пересечения с улицей Авиационной, также фиксирует нарушения правил проезда перекрёстков и требований сигналов светофора.
В Северском районе камеры установили на отметках 4…
Кубань ворвалась в четверку регионов России по числу самозапретов на кредиты.
За октябрь жители края оформили 30,9 тысячи ограничений на получение займов. Это сразу на 18,5% больше, чем в сентябре. По темпам роста Кубань уступила только Алтайскому краю.
Буржуй, Пипитруся и Цой — так зовут питомцев, которые ходят к ветеринарам на Кубани
Среди необычных кличек — коты Шприц, Кабачок, Матрас и Зумер, собаки Баран, Носок, Вафля и Геббельс.
Бездомных собак будут отлавливать со 2 по 29 ноября в Краснодаре
Рейды пройдут в четырёх округах города:
⚪️Прикубанском;
⚪️ Центральном;
⚪️ Карасунском;
⚪️ Западном.
Владельцев домашних питомцев просят не отпускать их гулять без присмотра.
Улицу Вишняковой в Краснодаре перекроют почти на месяц.
С 1 ноября движение ограничат на участке от улицы КИМ до Адыгейской Набережной. Там будут прокладывать напорную сеть ливневой канализации в рамках строительства насосной станции и трубопровода. Ограничения продлятся до 30 ноября.
В Успенском районе ночью погиб пешеход.
Мужчина переходил дорогу на федеральной трассе Р-217 «Кавказ», когда его сбил автомобиль. Подробности инцидента выясняются.
Тело мужчины нашли во дворе многоэтажки в Краснодаре
В городских пабликах рассказали, что тело мужчины обнаружили утром между ЖК «Дружный 2» и «Рэд» в сквере в районе улицы Адмирала Крузенштерна и Адмиралтейского бульвара.
Житель Тимашевска обманул краснодарку на 1 727 000 рублей
45-летняя женщина обратилась в полицию: знакомый убедил её вложить 1,7 млн рублей в швейное производство и онлайн-продажу одежды — ни прибыли, ни товара она не получила. Кроме того, мужчина похитил её банковскую карту и потратил с неё ещё 27 тысяч, в том числе снял наличные, выхватив карту из рук.
Подозреваемого — 46-летнего жителя Тимашевска — задержали в Б…
В парке «Краснодар» рабочие уже развешивают гирлянды на деревьях вдоль улицы Восточно-Кругликовской и рядом со стадионом.
К новогодним праздникам здесь также появятся елка и несколько праздничных локаций. Фасад стадиона по традиции украсят светящимися снежинками.
В Краснодаре поваленный забор уже третий день мешает пешеходам
На перекрёстке улиц Восточно-Кругликовской и 40-летия Победы рухнуло ограждение, отделяющее тротуар от проезжей части.
По словам местных жителей, забор лежит уже третий день, но убирать или восстанавливать его никто не спешит.
❤8🔥6👍1
Showing the 12 most recent of 75 posts we hold for @Novorossysx4. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 107 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
2
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
2
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
0
vacant every time we have ever looked
@Novorossysx4 named 2 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Evidenced gone
We ourselves saw each of these resolve to a real page at some point before it went vacant — a genuine, evidenced change, not an inference from absence.
@tyumen_2 named in 11 posts, 8 August 2026 – 4 November 2026 · confirmed gone 9 November 2026 (two independent sightings — see how we confirm a dead handle)evidenced
@perm0 named in 6 posts, 18 October 2026 – 4 November 2026 · confirmed gone 6 November 2026 (two independent sightings — see how we confirm a dead handle)evidenced
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Телеблог Новороссийск Краснодарский край станица Раевская Крымск Анапа Славянск на кубани Витязево Гайдук реклама афиша вакансии” (@Novorossysx4), 25,915 subscribers as measured 11 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Novorossysx4.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.