Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for خط خوردگی

Channel

خط خوردگی

@khaatkhordegi

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

417subscribers

+1 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001481293795
TypeChannel
Username@khaatkhordegi
CreatedBetween 1 April 2019 and 30 September 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 September 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged3 times, most recently 12 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/khaatkhordegi

Topic

Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 21 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 97% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

416419417.56 August 2026 — 416 subscribers6 August 2026 — 416 subscribers14 August 2026 — 419 subscribers28 August 2026 — 417 subscribers4176 August 202628 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 22 days, net +1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 416–419 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
28 Aug 2026, 16:37417-2
14 Aug 2026, 17:29419+3
6 Aug 2026, 19:32416no change
6 Aug 2026, 17:16416first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 8 August 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 4 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

303 reactions across 19 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 65.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
19865.3%
👍5317.5%
🕊144.62%
🔥134.29%
👏92.97%
🙏82.64%
😢51.65%
👎10.33%
💔10.33%
💯10.33%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 303 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 8 August 2025 to 4 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

4 Aug 2026, 13:13 UTC100 views7 reactionsread 6 August 2026
File

File, posted without a caption

4🕊2🔥1

Signed vahid nosrat

20 Jul 2026, 18:26 UTC264 views12 reactionsread 6 August 2026
File

File, posted without a caption

🙏5🔥3🕊21👏1

Signed vahid nosrat

20 Jul 2026, 18:26 UTC250 views5 reactionsread 6 August 2026

متاسفانه اینترنت و گوگل میت دست به دست هم دادن تا این جلسه آفلاین ضبط بشه. شرمنده دوستانی که پشت در موندن.

5

Signed vahid nosrat

13 Jul 2026, 20:36 UTC396 views13 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

بعد از کشتار دی ماه همه چیز تغییر یافت ، جامعه دو شقه شد و امکان گفتگو به صفر رسید. بهت زده میان کشته‌ها، هر کدام مرگ را برانداز کردیم. روایت‌های سابق رنگ باختند و عاملیت تبدیل به علامت سوال شد. ضربه چنان هولناک و فضا چنان گل‌آلود بود که «برخاستن» ردی از خاطره‌ای دور می‌نمود. در این میان ضرورتی خدشه ناپذیر به بازیابی و بازتعریف سربرآورد. سلسله جلسات «اندیشه در میان خون» حول همین ضرورت شکل گرفت، اما دو جلسه بیشتر نگذش

12🕊1

Signed vahid nosrat

9 Jul 2026, 14:04 UTC420 views14 reactionsread 6 August 2026

محاصره عنوان فیلم این ایده را برمی‌انگیزد که با جهان یک وسواسی مواجهیم، اما این تمام ماجرا نیست. واژه‌ی obsession از فعل لاتین obsidere ساخته شده است به معنای: بر یا مقابل چیزی نشستن، محاصره کردن. در لاتین قرون وسطی معنای تسخیر شدن توسط شیاطین را می‌گیرد و در قرن نوزدهم توسط روان‌پزشکان فرانسوی برای افکاری به کار می‌رود که ناخواسته ظاهر می‌شوند و مدام بازمی‌گردند. فیلم هر سه‌ معنا را پوشش می‌دهد و در این میان معادل

12🕊2

Signed vahid nosrat

16 Jun 2026, 10:37 UTC457 views6 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

علاقه‌مندانی که با نظریه‌ی لکان آشنایی دارند و در یکی از زمینه‌های زیر مشغول فعالیتند، مخاطب این دعوت هستند: روان‌شناسی، ریاضی، فلسفه، فیزیک، هنر و ترجمه. در صورت تمایل پیام دهید. @vahidnosrat وحید نصرت‌نژد

5🔥1

Signed vahid nosrat

31 May 2026, 16:54 UTC579 views20 reactionsread 6 August 2026

زیستن در مدار وارونگی تجربه‌ی جنگ در کنار تمام آسیب‌ها و رنج‌ها، پرسشی بنیان‌افکن درباره‌ی "کنش‌مندی" مطرح ساخت. پیش از شروع جنگ ده‌ها‌هزار جان از کف رفته بر کف داشتیم، خشم، انزجار، مشت‌های گره کرده، فضای دوقطبی و مشاجره‌های جدی بر سر آینده‌ی ایران. یک سمت ماجرا چشم به راه نجات دهنده‌ای از آن سوی دریاها بود و طرف دیگر پیرو جنبشی درون‌زاد. طرف اول بر به انسداد رسیدن جنبش بی‌رهبر تاکید داشت و طرف دوم بر استمرار. هر دو

19👍1

Signed vahid nosrat

24 Feb 2026, 08:08 UTC552 views16 reactionsread 6 August 2026
File

File, posted without a caption

14🙏2

Signed vahid nosrat

17 Feb 2026, 10:36 UTC674 views23 reactionsread 6 August 2026
File

نخستین جلسه از دوره "اندیشه در میان خون" برگزار شد. دوشنبه آینده با دومین جلسه ادامه خواهیم داد.

22🙏1

Signed vahid nosrat

10 Feb 2026, 15:34 UTC907 views19 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

آیا می‌توان در فضایی که "اشغال‌گران حاکم" کودکان را می‌کشند به مادرها تجاوز می‌کنند و پدرها را به بند می‌کشند از اندیشه سخن گفت؟ آیا می‌توان میان چنین توحشی زیست و غرق در "خون" از اندیشه "دَم" زد؟ آیا اندیشه در این شرایط نام دیگر بزدلی نیست که انفعال را توجیه می‌کند؟ آیا اساسا می‌توان از اندیشه‌ی عملی و رهایی‌بخش سخن به میان آورد؟ دوره‌ی پیش‌رو در وهله‌ی اول سعی در پاسخ‌دهی به چنین پرسش‌هایی را دارد و سودای گشودن روز

19

Signed vahid nosrat

7 Feb 2026, 19:29 UTC664 views11 reactionsread 6 August 2026
File

بعد از هر زخمی، دوره‌ای از گیجی آغاز می‌شود...

👍73🕊1

Signed vahid nosrat

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @khaatkhordegi. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 28 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“خط خوردگی” (@khaatkhordegi), 417 subscribers as measured 28 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/khaatkhordegi.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.