Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for KeziCast

Channel

KeziCast

@kezicast

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Cite this entry

314subscribers

+1 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001050379469
TypeChannel
Username@kezicast
Created11 May 2016measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (TGDataset)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live23 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 23 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/kezicast

Growth

313314313.56 August 2026 — 313 subscribers6 August 2026 — 313 subscribers23 August 2026 — 314 subscribers6 August 202623 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 17 days, net +1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 313–314 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
23 Aug 2026, 03:11314+1
6 Aug 2026, 22:17313no change
6 Aug 2026, 11:00313first reading

Engagement

9 posts held, back to 24 February 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 9 posts for this entry, the most recent from 27 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

43 reactions across 8 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 55.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
2455.8%
🔥1125.6%
😱49.30%
👍12.33%
👎12.33%
🤣12.33%
🥰12.33%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 9 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 43reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 9 most recent posts we hold, published 24 February 2026 to 27 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

27 Jul 2026, 12:50 UTC160 views1 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

this is the worst (feeling) multitool to be ever created, don't waste your time even considering it, one-hand operation is somewhat of a gimmick and it's too sharp / flimsy to be used heavily "made in the USA" my ass, gets mogged by chinese stuff I keep it only because Italian law forces you to not carry a knife and I was able to unbolt it for EDC (stock knife looks very "war tactical") Victorinox (🇨🇭) equivalent

👍1

Signed Kezi

7 May 2026, 19:34 UTC585 views4 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

(mostly) stock ArchLinux inside a Pluto/ZynqSDR clone

🔥4

Signed Kezi

17 Apr 2026, 19:14 UTC627 views6 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

New version doesn't look like an IED

🔥6

Signed Kezi

13 Apr 2026, 23:36 UTC758 views6 reactionsread 6 August 2026
File

[🇮🇹] Vi condivido un documento estratto di un lavoro che ho realizzato l'anno scorso per un noto think tank È un "paper scientifico" che analizza la storia dell'energia rinnovabile in europa, con diversi dettagli ingegneristici, concludendo con la dimostrazione di come sia stata una pessima idea have fun nei commenti

6

Signed Kezi

9 Apr 2026, 11:01 UTC600 views4 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Working on a new (web)sdr software

4

Signed Kezi

29 Mar 2026, 14:41 UTC673 views9 reactionsread 6 August 2026

daily reminder not to buy from china, for any reason, anything you wish to rely on now I need a lawyer

8👎1

Signed Kezi

17 Mar 2026, 21:26 UTC776 views11 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Video

Video, posted without a caption

5😱4🤣1🥰1

Signed Kezi

Showing the 9 most recent of 9 posts we hold for @kezicast. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 23 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“KeziCast” (@kezicast), 314 subscribers as measured 23 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/kezicast.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.