4 measurements spanning 9 days, net -5. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 273–280 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
15 Aug 2026, 20:34
274
-4
7 Aug 2026, 13:16
278
-1
6 Aug 2026, 23:30
279
no change
6 Aug 2026, 18:34
279
first reading
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 16 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
212.8%
avg views ÷ 274 subscribers
Avg views / post
583
5 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.738%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
5
of 20 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 4 of 5 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 August 2026
Posts held
20 (16 June 2026 – 2 August 2026)
Views total
2,916
Reactions total
14
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
6 Aug 2026, 23:30 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Reaction mix
56 reactions across 19 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 71.4% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
40
71.4%
👏
9
16.1%
👍
5
8.93%
👌
1
1.79%
😢
1
1.79%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 56reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 16 June 2026 to 2 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
تو دنیای شلوغ و پرتلاطم امروز، تا حالا شده لحظهای بایستی و از خودت بپرسی: «من برای چی کتاب میخونم؟» یا «قراره این خوندنها به کجا برسه و چی رو عوض کنه؟»
ما اینجا جمع شدیم تا تجربههای تو رو بشنویم. با کدوم شخصیت ادبی بیشتر از همه انس گرفتی؟ عطر کدوم کتاب هنوز توی خاطرت مونده؟
در «هنار» قراره میان کتابها و کلمات بشینیم، بخونیم و گفتوگو کنیم.
برای اطلاعات بیشتر و ثبتنام دایرکت هنار، یا پیوی خودمون پیام بدید.☺️
…
📕پرکشیدگان
✍نویسنده: اتی ین کرن
🔃مترجم: حیدر مظلوم
☑️محور داستان در مورد حادثهای تاریخی و واقعی است که در فوریهی ۱۹۱۲ رخ داد. خیاط اتریشیتبار ساکن پاریس، از بالای برج ایفل به درون خلاء پرید و جان خود را از دست داد.
کرن از این رویداد به عنوان نقطهی آغاز روایت استفاده میکند، اما رمان تنها مستندنگاری تاریخی نیست؛ بلکه بازتابی چندلایه از رویا، وسواس و سقوط انسانهاست.
🔗تمرکز اصلی کتاب بر روان فردی است که میخواهد ف…
📒گفتوگو با پرویز شکری درباره گریم و سینمای ایران
✍نویسنده:محمدحسین یزدانیراد، احسان عبدی
خواندنیترین روایتهای سینما گاهی نه جلوی دوربین، که در اتاق گریم شکل میگیرند. پشت پردۀ چهرهها روایت زندگی و تجربههای هنری پرویز شکری، از باسابقهترین گریمورهای سینمای ایران است؛ هنرمندی که حضور در بیش از یکصدوپنجاه فیلم و همکاری با کارگردانانی چون ساموئل خاچیکیان، سیامک یاسمی، ایرج قادری و کیومرث پوراحمد، او را به یکی از …
✉️نامههایی به شاعر جوان
✍️🏻نویسنده: راینر ماریا ریلکه
🔃مترجم: فرشته کرمانی
نامهها هم وسیلهای برای خودشناسیاند و هم پلی برای تبادل اندیشه با دیگران. کمتر کسی بهاندازۀ راینر ماریا ریلکه به این حقیقت آگاه بود. در ”نامههایی به شاعر جوان“ که برای فرانتس کساوِر کاپوس، افسر جوان ادبپرور نوشت، روحی لطیف، دوراندیشی، همدلی عمیق و حکمت زندهای بازتاب یافته است. این نامهها با صراحت و صداقت تحسینانگیزشان دعوتی ساده اما …
اورتورهای سینمایی
✍نویسنده: آنت اینسدورف
🔃مترجم: مازیار اسلامی، حسام نصیری
🥇ایدهی محوری آنت اینسدورف، استاد مطالعات سینما در دانشگاه کلمبیا، این است که صحنهی افتتاحیه، کلیدی برای فهم ساختار، درونمایه فیلم به شمار میآید. از نگاه نویسنده، این لحظات آغازین صرفا به معرفی شخصیتها یا مکان داستان محدود نمیشوند، بلکه بسیاری از مؤلفههای مضمونی و فرمی اثر را از همان ابتدا پیش روی مخاطب قرار میدهند.
📠اینسدورف در فصلها…
ولی تا دلت بخواهد آدم بیاستعداد و میخواره و دغلباز و دوبههمزن پیدا میکنی. نمیتوانم برایتان بگویم که چقدر ناراحتم از اینکه هنر محبوب من به دست کسانی افتاده که ازشان نفرت دارم. ناراحتم که آدمهای خوب این شر را فقط از دور میبینند و نمیخواهند نزدیکتر بیایند، و به جای آنکه کمکی بکنند، با کلمات پرطمطراق مطالب کلی مینویسند و موعظههایی میکنند که به درد هیچکس نمیخورد...
#داستان_ملالانگیز
#چخوف
📗قهرمان عصر ما
✍نویسنده: میخائیل لرمانتوف
🔃مترجم: میترا نظریان
قهرمان عصر ما در میانهٔ قرن نوزدهم منتشر شد و تصویری تأملبرانگیز از شخصیت و روان فرد در تقابل با جامعه ارائه داد. لرمانتوف در این اثر، با نگاهی روانشناسانه، شخصیت پچورین را به تصویر میکشد؛ قهرمانی که نمایندهٔ نسل جوان سرخوردهٔ آن دوران و تجسم کهنالگوی مشهور «آدم اضافی» است؛ مفهومی که بعدها به یکی از مفاهیم کلیدی ادبیات روسیه تبدیل شد. ساختار رمان نیز…
📙نیستی از بند رسته
✍نویسنده: ریه برسیه
🔃ترجمه: سید محمدجواد سیدی
این کتاب با نقد انسانمحوری در فلسفه معاصر، به موضوعاتی مانند نیهیلیسم، هستیشناسی، فلسفه علم و نقد سنتهای پستکانتی میپردازد. برسیه نیهیلیسم را نه بحرانی اخلاقی، بلکه پیامد منطقی روشنگری و علم مدرن میداند؛ علمی که جهانی مستقل از انسان و فاقد هرگونه معنا یا غایت ذاتی را آشکار کرده است. او همچنین سنتهایی مانند پدیدارشناسی، هرمنوتیک و دیگر رویکردهای…
👍2
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @ketabe_khaneh. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 546,606 of 1,480,944entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“کتابِ خانه” (@ketabe_khaneh), 274 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ketabe_khaneh.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.