سبحان الله، ببینید کی بالاخره تصمیم گرفته یه چیزی غیر از مدرسه جاسوسی/کتابای عاشقانه چینی/مانگا و مانهوا بخونه!!!!
😱20🤨2😁2

Channel
@ketab_negarr
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
547subscribers
+3 since we began measuring on 6 September 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001721454078 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @ketab_negarr |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 September 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 18 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 18 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/ketab_negarr |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 18 Sept 2026, 11:15 | 547 | +3 |
| 7 Sept 2026, 14:22 | 544 | no change |
| 6 Sept 2026, 20:47 | 544 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 6 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 30 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (6 July 2026 – 30 August 2026) |
| Views total | 297 |
| Reactions total | 24 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 7 Sept 2026, 14:22 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
319 reactions across 17 posts, in 16 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 32.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 102 | 32.0% | |
| 🤣 | 62 | 19.4% | |
| 🔥 | 45 | 14.1% | |
| ❤🔥 | 35 | 11.0% | |
| 💔 | 23 | 7.21% | |
| 😱 | 20 | 6.27% | |
| 👍 | 12 | 3.76% | |
| ⚡ | 7 | 2.19% | |
| 😁 | 3 | 0.94% | |
| 😍 | 3 | 0.94% | |
| 🤨 | 2 | 0.627% | |
| 🌚 | 1 | 0.313% | |
| 👎 | 1 | 0.313% | |
| 😭 | 1 | 0.313% | |
| 🙏 | 1 | 0.313% | |
| 🤩 | 1 | 0.313% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 319 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 6 July 2026 to 30 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
سبحان الله، ببینید کی بالاخره تصمیم گرفته یه چیزی غیر از مدرسه جاسوسی/کتابای عاشقانه چینی/مانگا و مانهوا بخونه!!!!
😱20🤨2😁2
من یه چیزی این وسط توی پرانتز بگم، مدرسه جاسوسی بعدی نزدیکه، هدف ما فعلا ترجمه یه کتاب نسبتا سبک بود که دور هم عشق کنیم تا مدرسه جاسوسی 14 بیاد ولی همه کتابهایی که پیشنهاد کردین (اونایی که قابل انجام بود/ترجمه نداشت) رو لیست کردیم و حواسمون بهشون هست. خواستم این رو بگم، خدایی نکرده سوتفاهم پیش نیاد که اهمیت داده نشده یا چیزی اگه هر وقت پیشنهاد جدیدی بود، خوشحال میشیم بهمون بگین. مرسی از همتون 🩷
❤29👎1
کدوم رو بیشتر دوست دارین جز ترجمه شدههای ما ببینین؟
The shares total 142%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Brighter than Scale, Swifter than Flame ژانر: فانتری، افسانههای قدیمی، عاشقانه خلاصه داستان: یوا یه شوالیه افسانهایه که بخاطر استعدادش توی شکار اژدها معروفه. یه روز یوا برای ماموریت به جایی فرستاده میشه که اژدها ها درش پرستیده میشن! یوا با ملکه جوان این سرزمین آشنا میشه و بهم نزدیک میشن. حالا یوا بین انتخاب قلبش و عقلش و انجام وظیفه اش باید یکی رو انتخاب کنه
❤3❤🔥2
The Last Musketeer (مجموعه، فعلا سه جلدی) ژانر: فانتزی، تاریخی، ماجراجویی خلاصه داستان: گرگ ریچ (🐺💸) یه پسر 14 ساله است که با خانوادهاش رفته پاریس مسافرت، اما به طور ناگهانی به سال 1615 پرت میشه. خانوادهاش دستگیر میشن و حالا اون باید برای نجاتشون، با سه تفنگدار افسانهای که توی این بازه زمانی اونها هم نوجوونن، متحد بشه و به کمک مهارت هاش از دنیای مدرن، بادشمن هایی که سر راهشون هست مبارزه کنه. (از روی جلد قضاوت نکنی…
❤7👍4⚡2
The River Has Roots ژانر: فانتزی، افسانههای قدیمی، عاشقانه خلاصه داستان: استر و ایزابل دوتا خواهرن که کنار یه رودخانه جادویی نزدیک مرز سرزمین پریان زندگی میکنن و از درختهای بید جادویی مراقبت میکنن. استر، از دنیای واقعیای که توش زندگی میکنه، یه خواستگاری داره، اما ردش میکنه و عاشق یه بنده خدایی از سرزمین پریان میشه. خواستگاره وقتی دست رد به سینهاش میخوره، استر رو میندازه توی رودخونه و میکشه. حالا روح استر برگشته ت…
❤3🌚1
Every Heart a Doorway ژانر: فانتزی، معمایی خلاصه داستان: درباره یه مدرسه شبانه روزی برای بچه هاییه که به دنیاهای خیالی سفر کردن و بعد از بازگشت به دنیای واقعی، دیگه نتونستن باهاش کنار بیان. نانسی (شخصیت اصلی) بعد از برگشتن از دنیای مردگان به این مدرسه فرستاده میشه. از طرفی قتلهای مرموزی هم داره توی مدرسه اتفاق میفته که نانسی و دوستاش باید راز اونها رو کشف کنن (به نظرم وایبی مثل اسکارلت و آیوی میده)
❤6👍4🔥1
یک سوال به شدت بی ربط: کسی اینجا موزیکال فن هست؟ نه سریال و فیلم، موزیکالی که اصلش موزیک باشه و اجرای تئاتری هم داشته باشه
.... دوستان سایت/اپ با دسترسی و محدودیت سنی نیست ها، که سنتون رو بالا بزنین یه ویژگی خاصی براتون آنلاک شه😂😂 راحت باشین، و لطفا بی پرده! سنتون رو اعلام کنین. نظرسنجی ناشناسه
🤣44
Posted without readable text
❤4
نظرسنجیهای زیر برای شناخت بهتر مخاطبین فعلیست چند سالتونه؟
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
❤6❤🔥1😁1
سوال: اگه میخواستین یه کتابی، بجز مدرسه جاسوسی، توسط تیم ما ترجمه بشه، اون چه کتابیه؟ ترجیحا کتابی که تا الان هیچ نشری منتشرش نکرده اسمش رو این زیر بگید (ترجیحا تر، کتاب تکجلدی. ولی اگه مجموعهای هم مد نظر بود بگین که بدونیم)
🔥18
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @ketab_negarr. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
کدوم رو بیشتر دوست دارین جز ترجمه شدههای ما ببینین؟
The shares total 142%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
نظرسنجیهای زیر برای شناخت بهتر مخاطبین فعلیست چند سالتونه؟
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 6 July 2026 to 30 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Ketab-negar ( tel branch✌🏻 )” (@ketab_negarr), 547 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ketab_negarr.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.