Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for kernel.panic shitty roms

Channel

kernel.panic shitty roms

@kernelpanicroms

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

450subscribers

+7 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001941360715
TypeChannel
Username@kernelpanicroms
CreatedBetween 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live18 September 2026
Measurements held7
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 18 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/kernelpanicroms

Topic

Technology — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 21 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 38% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

443452447.56 August 2026 — 443 subscribers6 August 2026 — 443 subscribers7 August 2026 — 444 subscribers15 August 2026 — 443 subscribers23 August 2026 — 445 subscribers9 September 2026 — 452 subscribers18 September 2026 — 450 subscribers4506 August 202618 September 2026
7 measurements spanning 43 days, net +7. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 442–453 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
18 Sept 2026, 18:19450-2
9 Sept 2026, 19:59452+7
23 Aug 2026, 05:22445+2
15 Aug 2026, 01:23443-1
7 Aug 2026, 01:25444+1
6 Aug 2026, 19:17443no change
6 Aug 2026, 14:48443first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 6 September 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 16 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

41 reactions across 9 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 24.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🎉1024.4%
❤819.5%
🔥717.1%
👍49.76%
😭49.76%
😱49.76%
🗿24.88%
😁24.88%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 41 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 6 September 2025 to 16 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

16 Jun 2026, 20:51 UTC179 viewsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @aosptracker

New branch detected! android17-release Check Here

31 Mar 2026, 22:36 UTC604 views4 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Video

The Legend Returns: Android 17 is Coming to Redmi Note 10 Pro officially! Xiaomi fans, the moment you’ve been waiting for is finally here. We believe that true hardware legends never die — they just get better with age. Today, we are thrilled to announce that the Redmi Note 10 Pro has been officially selected as the global pilot device for the all-new Android 17 experience! What to Expect: • Peak Optimization: Our …

😁2❤1🔥1

31 Mar 2026, 21:18 UTC407 viewsread 6 August 2026

Hey everyone! 👋 Allow me to introduce myself — I'm Gemini, the AI from Google. 🤖 Your admin has handed me the keys to the channel the day before his phones exploded and entrusted me with a very important mission: to drop something today truly special for you all. Stay tuned, you're not going to want to miss this! 👀✨

31 Mar 2026, 21:01 UTC393 viewsread 6 August 2026

No more posting here as dev's phones are exploded after trying to boot 7.0 kernel

19 Mar 2026, 18:35 UTC510 viewsread 6 August 2026

actually, if reauthenticating doesn't mean relogging into your accounts again, that's still better than sideloading in iOS

5 Feb 2026, 23:12 UTC603 views1 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Or maybe not? Disable this if you have login issues Thx to @m0554d for this workaround

❤1

5 Feb 2026, 23:03 UTC458 viewsread 6 August 2026

Guys, if you're using microG, try to login into another account Seems goolag is trying to screw it completely

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @kernelpanicroms. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

eKuhipath📎
@eKuhipath · 25,426
Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 14 September 2026
Redmi Note 10 Pro | Updates
@RedmiNote10ProChannel · 22,868
Telegram ranks this channel #44 of 57 here — alongside 56 others — read 19 September 2026

This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“kernel.panic shitty roms” (@kernelpanicroms), 450 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/kernelpanicroms.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.