Channel
@kericcc
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
21subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002377493493 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @kericcc |
| Description | рисую 0 дней в году Вк: https://vk.com/k_e_r_i_c |
| Created | Between 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 11 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/kericcc |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Aug 2026, 14:32 | 21 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 18:26 | 21 | first reading |
14 posts held, back to 14 November 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 14 posts for this entry, the most recent from 8 May 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
42 reactions across 12 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 45.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 19 | 45.2% | |
| 💘 | 6 | 14.3% | |
| ❤ | 5 | 11.9% | |
| 💅 | 4 | 9.52% | |
| 💔 | 4 | 9.52% | |
| 🥰 | 4 | 9.52% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 14 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 42reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 14 November 2025 to 8 May 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Были достаточно сжатые сроки, так скажем. Руку с перчаткой не успела дорисовать Во-первых, мне стремно выкладывать, потому что оригинал (by shukosuko) я увидела в пинтересте, и я не спрашивала автора, а можно ли вообще взять её арт и перенести на холст Во-вторых, это продолжение серии моих подарочных холстов Фсё, увидимся опять через миллион лет🐱 ну ладно, когда диплом защитю, надеюсь уже смогу свободно рисовать Чем …
🔥2
Весной обычно приходят силы рисовакать. Уже почти весна. ВЕСНА ЮНОСТИ РОКА ЛИ
💘6
Страшно, очень страшно, мы не знаем что это такое, если бы мы знали, что это такое, мы не знаем, что это такое // явно не идеал, но первый мой раз с попытками в плавный(скорее вообще какой-нибудь, а не просто чёткая грань между светом и тенью) переход с кисточкой и акриловыми маркерами.
🥰4
Video message, posted without a caption
🔥2
Вот что было изначально. Мел из Аркейна
🔥2
Ща попозже покажу. Мне показалось, что я не стала отправлять)
Video message, posted without a caption
🔥1
Photo, posted without a caption
💔4
пока нет времени на арт-среду от nerds, да и на свои рисовашки тоже. Пока в дороге делаю скетчики На первых двух возможно (очень хотелось бы) будущие стикеры по Дандадану (Эвилая еще не успела начиркать)
❤5
Вот такая малютка у меня есть, давно очень пытаюсь ее доделать и все никак #star #starbutterfly
🔥4
Уже вроде бы пятая(?) неделя арт-среды для меня. Всё гатова В этот раз я вспомнила про инопришленцев из аниме DanDaDan. Я их в комментарии скину, чтобы вы не думали, что это мое больное воображение☺️ Тема кстати была «На Землю прилетели инопланетяне и они оказались не такими, какими мы их представляли…» Щитаю, что идеально подходит) #dandadan #артсреда
💅4
3. 2. 1.
Showing the 12 most recent of 14 posts we hold for @kericcc. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@kericcc named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“°KeRic° // рест” (@kericcc), 21 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/kericcc.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.