Channel
@keramarkh
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
836subscribers
-1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001709244078 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @keramarkh |
| Created | 11 March 2022 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 14 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/keramarkh |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Aug 2026, 21:38 | 836 | -1 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 01:21 | 837 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 15:27 | 837 | first reading |
9 posts held, back to 7 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 26 July 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 9 (7 May 2026 – 26 July 2026) |
| Views total | 135 |
| Reactions total | 11 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 8 Aug 2026, 01:21 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
96 reactions across 9 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 69.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 67 | 69.8% | |
| 🔥 | 15 | 15.6% | |
| 👍 | 8 | 8.33% | |
| 👌 | 4 | 4.17% | |
| 🥰 | 2 | 2.08% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 9 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 96reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 9 most recent posts we hold, published 7 May 2026 to 26 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Сегодня день рождения отмечает Андрей Иванович Роденков — ключевой сотрудник музея «Керамарх», научный консультант «Паллады» и один из главных исследователей архитектурной художественной керамики. Прошедший личный год стал для Андрея Ивановича невероятно плодотворным и принес два знаковых события. Во-первых, вышла в свет долгожданная книга «Изразцовые печи Петербурга» (в соавторстве с Константином Лихолатом) — фун…
❤11
Керамика в архитектуре — это всегда вызов. Мы знаем, сколько сил уходит на то, чтобы довести сложный фасад или интерьер до результата, когда всё смотрится так, как задумано. Если вы реализовали такой объект в последние полтора года — нам хочется, чтобы о нем узнало профессиональное сообщество! Продолжается прием заявок в нашу керамарховскую номинацию «Золотого Трезини» — «Лучший реализованный проект фасада или инте…
❤7👍2
«Я вернулся в мой город…» Впервые с 1985 года работы выдающегося художника-керамиста Юрия Новикова (1946–2018) в таком количестве вернулись в Петербург. В одном из залов «Керамарха» открылась важная выставка, приуроченная к 80-летию со дня рождения мастера. Для истории ленинградской школы реставрации это возвращение легенды, а для зрителя — по-настоящему сентиментальное событие и редкий визуальный опыт, ломающий сте…
❤12🔥2👍1
Приглашаем всех на 4ceramics — уже в эти выходные! Кажется, это последний наш маркет в Москве до осени, рекомендуем не упускать возможность выбрать аромалампы по душе ❤️ 🏛️ Культурный центр ЗИЛ Москва, ул. Восточная, 4, корп. 1 🗓 6–7 июня 12:00–20:00 Вход свободный / 0+
❤5
Поздравляем всех причастных с международным днем музеев! И конечно, всегда ждём в гости! «Керамарх» работает по летнему расписанию, то есть на час дольше. ⬇️ По понедельникам, четвергам, пятницам, субботам и воскресеньям мы открыты с 11 до 19 часов, по вторникам — с 11 до 18. Среда — выходной. 📖Музей Керамарх📖
❤4👌1
Выставка фотографий «Изразцовые печи и камины Санкт-Петербурга» 📍Керамарх, Петербург Если вдруг по какой-то причине вы еще не были в Музее архитектурной керамики — даю вам еще один повод туда наведаться. До 7 июня помимо основной экспозиции, о которой есть пост, можно увидеть фотографии десятков печей и каминов. Есть и редкие! Например, фотографии из дворца Михаила Михайловича на Адмиралтейской набережной или из П…
❤7👍2🥰2
Вечер среды предлагаем провести в компании авторов книги «Изразцовые печи Петербурга» в прекрасных «Подписных изданиях»! Ждём вас завтра в 19:00 — будет интересный разговор не только о самой книге, но и о музее «Керамарх», о коллекции, которая легла в его основу, и, конечно, о сложном деле реставрации изразцовых печей. 📍Напоминаем, что в «Керамархе» до 7 июня открыта выставка фотографий, многие из которых использов…
🔥7❤3👌3
13 мая в 19:00, в рамках совместного проекта книжного магазина «Подписные издания» и Общедоступных библиотек Санкт-Петербурга пройдет презентация альбома «Изразцовые печи Петербурга», вышедшего в издательстве «Кучково поле Музеон». На встрече Константин Лихолат и Андрей Роденков поговорят о том, почему в книге отдано предпочтение именно финляндским изразцовым печам, как через печи можно проследить смену вкусов петер…
❤7
В прошлом году мы выпустили книгу об изразцовых печах Петербурга, календарь на 2026 год, а в этом — открыли выставку фотографий 👇 «Изразцовые печи и камины Санкт-Петербурга» В основе экспозиции — фотографии уникальных петербургских печей: от белоглазурованных с росписями на традиционные сюжеты до изысканных «штучных» изделий эпохи строительного бума конца XIX века. Вы увидите, как за столетия менялись вкусы и техно…
❤11🔥6👍3
Showing the 9 most recent of 9 posts we hold for @keramarkh. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 960,180 of 1,350,102entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Керамарх” (@keramarkh), 836 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/keramarkh.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.