3 measurements spanning 8 days, net -1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 97–98 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
15 Aug 2026, 15:55
97
-1
9 Aug 2026, 11:45
98
no change
7 Aug 2026, 21:38
98
first reading
Engagement
9 posts held, back to 30 March 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
50.5%
avg views ÷ 97 subscribers
Avg views / post
49.0
1 post measured
Reaction rate
34.7%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
1
of 9 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 22 July 2026
Posts held
9 (30 March 2026 – 22 July 2026)
Views total
49
Reactions total
17
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
9 Aug 2026, 11:45 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
24s
Average length
12s
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
157 reactions across 9 posts, in 20 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 42.7% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
67
42.7%
🔥
23
14.6%
🥰
9
5.73%
💘
7
4.46%
👏
6
3.82%
🤩
6
3.82%
🍓
5
3.18%
🐳
5
3.18%
🕊
5
3.18%
⚡
4
2.55%
👍
4
2.55%
😁
4
2.55%
🙏
4
2.55%
👾
2
1.27%
🌚
1
0.637%
👀
1
0.637%
💋
1
0.637%
🤔
1
0.637%
🤗
1
0.637%
🦄
1
0.637%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 9 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 157reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 9 most recent posts we hold, published 30 March 2026 to 22 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
«Я в кои-то веки сделала домашку, хотя её никто не задавал»
Это отзыв сотрудницы Roche про наш внутренний вебинар на тему Executive Presentation 🌝
Проект получился очень вовлекающим:
• 65% сотрудников подключились онлайн
• еще 20% посмотрели запись
• а коллеги из других стран попросили подготовить англоязычную версию
Поэтому мы решили упаковать этот опыт в отдельную статью и честно рассказать, как все происходило…
✦ Что меняется внутри
Эти месяцы были жаркими не только по загрузке. Внутри команды тоже происходило много важных изменений: мы много обсуждали, спорили, пересматривали привычные процессы и пытались понять, какими хотим видеть себя дальше.
И все это постепенно привело нас в новую точку роста — в процессах, подходе к работе, культуре и сервисе
Подробности пока раскрывать не будем, но уверены: все, кто взаимодействуе…
Два месяца без дайджестов — и началось 🙄
«А где?» «А когда?» «А почему?»
И если честно — это безумно приятно
Кажется, формат действительно прижился, раз многие его ждали и даже спрашивали о нем лично. Поэтому в качестве официальной причины нашего исчезновения предлагаем версию:
мы специально снизили активность, чтобы протестировать вовлеченность канала и определить самые удачные единицы контента 😌
А если без шуток…
Коллеги, ищем Project Manager 👀
Человека, который умеет держать проекты в порядке и спокойно ведет их от первой встречи до финальной сдачи
👤 Ждем тебя в нашей команде, если ты:
• работал(а) в агентстве или студии
• вел(а) проекты в digital или коммуникационном дизайне
• умеешь структурировать процессы и наводить порядок
✍️ Что предстоит делать:
• вести проекты и координировать команду
• быть основным контактом для…
Мы наконец упаковали один из крупных проектов, над которым команда работала дольше, чем строится средний загородный дом 😅
Мы помогали фарм-компании Glenmark с выводом на российский рынок нового дерматологического продукта, который теперь можно встретить в аптеках, на маркетплейсах и в кабинете врача — эмолент Elovera AD 🧬
На старте у нас были только логотип и упаковка. Задача ➔ масштабировать фирменный стиль и упак…
Все слышали про баухаус, конструктивизм, брутализм…
но на этом всё точно не заканчивается 🖼
Визуальных направлений сильно больше —
и мы собрали 20 стилей, из которых сами регулярно тянем рефы в проекты 🖱
Если встретится хотя бы один новый — ❤️ на пост
Наш коллега недавно был в Питере и посетил интересную выставку, которая напомнила о важном: для создания сильного дизайна недостаточно просто смотреть референсы
Мы часто думаем про тренды, конкурентов, визуальные приемы, но забываем про более базовую вещь — контекст ✅
👥 Визуальный язык создается средой: что человек видит каждый день, к каким образам привык, как воспринимает мир вокруг
👁 И один и тот же дизайн выгл…
С 1 апреля 🤡
Найдите на карточке свой месяц и узнайте, что сегодня вы можете подарить коллегам 🤝🏻
p.s. это разовая акция в честь праздника, пообещайте, что в остальные дни такого не будет…
В нашем деле важно вдохновение, черпать для себя новые идеи, общая насмотренность…
сложно поспорить, верно?
Поэтому мы вместе с Дашей, нашим старшим дизайнером, собрали подборку ключевых слов для Pinterest 🔑
➔ botanical poster
винтажные постеры с растениями, где отдельное внимание уделяется композиции
➔ blueprint
чертежная графика с сетками, линиями и техническим ощущением точности
➔ editorial typography layout…
❤9🔥4🤩3🌚1🐳1💘1🕊1
Showing the 9 most recent of 9 posts we hold for @kentron_community. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 1,412,000 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“kentron” (@kentron_community), 97 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/kentron_community.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
