Photo, posted without a caption
❤9👾3

Channel
@kenma_hq
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
20subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 12 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002698798725 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @kenma_hq |
| Created | Between 1 April 2025 and 31 July 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 12 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/kenma_hq |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 19:25 | 20 | no change |
| 12 Aug 2026, 15:02 | 20 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 12 August 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 9 October 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
66 reactions across 11 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 53.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 35 | 53.0% | |
| 👾 | 31 | 47.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 66reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 12 August 2025 to 9 October 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Photo, posted without a caption
❤9👾3
❌❌❌❌😈 ничего не пишу, потому что после недели социализации в лагере мне нужен месяц отдыха от людей. 😈😈😈😈😈😈😈😈😈
❤6👾3
Channel photo updated
что, опять мне тебя чему-то учить? ну, если в играх ты не так же плох, как в волейболе, почему бы и нет...
ладно, немного я поем... всё-таки ты уже меня вытащил, не зря ведь. но так прерывать меня посреди игры было немного грубо. хотя во время одного из тренировочных лагерей Куроо вообще забрал мою приставку, так что тебя я прощаю.
❌❌❌❌😈 и напоследок Лев вытащил меня на барбекю... я не слишком люблю мясо — после него такая тяжесть в животе, но пришлось пойти, потому что меня чуть ли не силой вытащили. да, Лев? я же не ребёнок, чтобы за мной следить. лучше иди повеселись с кем-нибудь, а я всё же добью босса в игре... 😈😈😈😈😈😈😈😈😈
❤1
❌❌❌❌😈 ❌ 🅾🔡🔚 🔡🅰🔡 ❌❌🔚🆚🔚🔡™️ ◀️ Ленточки ▶️ от Кенмы Козуме. Тадаши. Несмотря на неловкость во время знакомства, ты показался мне хорошим человеком. Я надеюсь, мы в будущем мы снова встретимся — может, не только вот так, беззаботно и ни с чем, кроме добрых намерений, но и на волейбольной площадке, чтобы сразиться по-серьёзному. Вроде говорят, что это весело. Яку-сан. На этот раз мы сыграли вдвоём. Непривычно, но я ра…
❤4👾2
❌❌❌❌😈 Яку-сан хорошо поддержал. только благодаря ему игра вышла не такой напряжной, как я думал, хотя под палящим солнцем всё равно тяжело. 😈😈😈😈😈😈😈😈😈
❌❌❌❌😈 утром выложили расписание матчей и распределение по парам... честно говоря, после недели тренировок на песку всё тело ноет. но я с Яку-саном. он хороший и надёжный игрок... правда, это не значит, что он не заставит меня выкладываться на полную. 😈😈😈😈😈😈😈😈😈
👾3
❌❌❌❌😈 честно говоря, завтрашний матч я действительно жду... это ведь последний день, да? три тренировки за день — слишком много, дольше я бы не выдержал. 😈😈😈😈😈😈😈😈😈
❌❌❌❌😈 тебе, Лев, стоило бы воспринимать это как новый опыт, а не расстраиваться из-за этой глупости... ты ведь в паре с доигровщиком из Аобы? можно и научиться у него чему-нибудь полезному. 😈😈😈😈😈😈😈😈😈
❌❌❌❌😈 разве Шоё не играет в том числе чтобы и стать сильнее тоже? если спрашивать его об этом, никакого толкового объяснения получить почти невозможно. ну и ладно... волейбол для меня... интересен, наверное. это похоже на стратегические игры, хотя многие, вроде Ямамото или вашего шумного доигровщика, играют просто потому, что весело, не строят замысловатых планов на матчи. мне легко проявить себя в стратегии, но в ф…
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @kenma_hq. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 1,132,179 of 1,478,351entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@kenma_hq named 3 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“𝚊𝚙𝚙𝚕𝚎𝚙𝚒 — 𝚔𝚎𝚗𝚖𝚊” (@kenma_hq), 20 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/kenma_hq.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.