Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for کلید ایمان

Channel

کلید ایمان

@kelide_iman

On this record: Topic · Observations · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

9,613subscribers

+954 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001687661451
TypeChannel
Username@kelide_iman
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 November 2026
Measurements held28
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 14 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/kelide_iman

Topic

Religion — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Content that also appears on other registered channels

Posts published here appear in near-verbatim form on 1 other registered channel. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.

Matching posts — open both and compare (3 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Posted firstThenOverlapGap
@anti_shobahat/152087 Aug 2026, 03:54 UTC@kelide_iman/5957 · this entry8 Aug 2026, 06:32 UTC0.9927 hours
@kelide_iman/5922 · this entry5 Aug 2026, 07:04 UTC@anti_shobahat/152939 Aug 2026, 18:15 UTC0.974 days
@kelide_iman/5982 · this entry15 Aug 2026, 15:30 UTC@anti_shobahat/1550020 Aug 2026, 12:57 UTC0.955 days
Channels this entry shares post bodies with, where at least one matching post pair has no forward credit between the two channels, or to a common source, recorded in our data
ChannelMatching postsText overlapTypical gapPublished first
@anti_shobahat6 (6/6 hand-verifiable sample passed)0.9825 hours@anti_shobahat (4–2)

Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.

What this cannot establish

MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.

Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. 1 of the 1 matches recorded here fall after that date and carried no header when we read them. The rest predate reliable capture and are not evidence either way.

“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 59 comparable posts for this entry, running 5 August 2026 to 13 November 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.

The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.

  • Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
  • 'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
  • shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
  • Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).

Recorded under the key clone_mutual, last confirmed 14 November 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Growth

8,3739,7019,0376 August 2026 — 8,659 subscribers6 August 2026 — 8,659 subscribers6 August 2026 — 8,657 subscribers9 August 2026 — 8,638 subscribers12 August 2026 — 8,619 subscribers16 August 2026 — 8,596 subscribers18 August 2026 — 8,573 subscribers22 August 2026 — 8,551 subscribers25 August 2026 — 8,520 subscribers28 August 2026 — 8,505 subscribers31 August 2026 — 8,473 subscribers3 September 2026 — 8,455 subscribers9 September 2026 — 8,423 subscribers12 September 2026 — 8,387 subscribers16 September 2026 — 8,373 subscribers30 September 2026 — 9,557 subscribers7 October 2026 — 9,591 subscribers13 October 2026 — 9,576 subscribers16 October 2026 — 9,556 subscribers19 October 2026 — 9,586 subscribers22 October 2026 — 9,556 subscribers25 October 2026 — 9,615 subscribers28 October 2026 — 9,701 subscribers31 October 2026 — 9,688 subscribers3 November 2026 — 9,690 subscribers6 November 2026 — 9,668 subscribers9 November 2026 — 9,645 subscribers14 November 2026 — 9,613 subscribers9,6136 August 202614 November 2026
28 measurements spanning 100 days, net +954. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 8,174–9,900 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 28
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Nov 2026, 13:369,613-32
9 Nov 2026, 13:159,645-23
6 Nov 2026, 05:419,668-22
3 Nov 2026, 06:269,690+2
31 Oct 2026, 01:179,688-13
28 Oct 2026, 09:019,701+86
25 Oct 2026, 11:279,615+59
22 Oct 2026, 09:509,556-30
19 Oct 2026, 10:199,586+30
16 Oct 2026, 18:419,556-20
13 Oct 2026, 14:189,576-15
7 Oct 2026, 22:169,591+34
30 Sept 2026, 23:189,557+1,184
16 Sept 2026, 13:408,373-14
12 Sept 2026, 18:158,387-36
9 Sept 2026, 03:408,423-32
3 Sept 2026, 14:578,455-18
31 Aug 2026, 17:048,473-32
28 Aug 2026, 06:358,505-15
25 Aug 2026, 11:228,520first reading

Engagement

153 posts held, back to 4 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 49 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
8.93%
avg views ÷ 9,613 subscribers
Avg views / post
859
55 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.20%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
55
of 153 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 14 November 2026
Posts held153 (4 August 2026 – 14 November 2026)
Views total47,230
Reactions total1,041
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken14 Nov 2026, 12:23 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
1h 01m
Average length
1m 14s

Measured directly from 50 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

2,991 reactions across 153 posts, in 16 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 63.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤1,89863.5%
👍34911.7%
❤‍🔥32110.7%
😁1314.38%
👏762.54%
🥰581.94%
😭361.20%
😢270.903%
🤯190.635%
🤩180.602%
👎160.535%
💯150.502%
🕊110.368%
🫡90.301%
😱60.201%
🤬10.033%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 153 of the 153 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,991 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 153 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 14 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 4 of 55 posts held from the last 30 days (7.27%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

14 Nov 2026, 10:32 UTC124 views7 reactionsread 14 November 2026
Video

بهترین تصمیم ☝️ برادر به اسلام سفر کرد، 🕋 صاحب عرش عظیم از او قبول کند #قسمت_چهل_یکم ✨در نشر نیکی ها سهیم باشیم ✨ ᓚ₇ @Kelide_iman ┈┉┈┉•▴•🇵🇸 •▴•┉┈┉┈

❤7

14 Nov 2026, 02:30 UTC344 views12 reactionsread 14 November 2026

🌎 اختراع و دستاورد تمدن اسلامی 5️⃣ کوره تقطیر روغن - ابن سینا کوره‌ای برای استخراج اسانس‌های گیاهی که در عطرسازی و طب سنتی کاربرد داشت.. #قسمت_پنجم #کلید_ایمان @Kelide_iman

❤12

13 Nov 2026, 14:46 UTC590 views30 reactionsread 14 November 2026
Video

روافض رو باید اینطوری رسوا کرد ماجرا خیلی سادست: تو یک کتاب تاریخی (به اسم الوافی بالوفیات)، نویسنده داره لیست دروغ‌ها و حرف‌های کفرآمیزِ یک آدم خیلی منحرف و فاسد رافضی رو می‌نویسه به اسم (نَظّام) نویسنده می‌گه این آدمِ کذاب کارش به جایی رسیده بود که به دروغ می‌گفت: «عمر به شکم فاطمه ضربه زده». اما آخوندها میان چیکار می‌کنن؟ سر و ته متن رو قیچی می‌کنن، فقط همون یک خط رو درمیارن و به مردم می‌گن: «ببینید! تو کتاب‌ها…

❤24👍4👏1🤯1

13 Nov 2026, 10:30 UTC621 views20 reactionsread 14 November 2026
Video

انتخاب نو و تولدی دوباره ☝️ یک مادر و پسرش در آریزونای آمریکا به دین مبین اسلام مشرف گردیدند #قسمت_چهل ✨در نشر نیکی ها سهیم باشیم ✨ ᓚ₇ @Kelide_iman ┈┉┈┉•▴•🇵🇸 •▴•┉┈┉┈

❤20

12 Nov 2026, 13:54 UTC841 views27 reactionsread 14 November 2026
Photo

. 🇹🇷 چرا ترک‌ها هنگام شنیدن نام رسول‌الله ﷺ دست بر سینه می‌گذارند؟ در فرهنگ مذهبی مردم ترکیه، گذاشتن دست راست بر سمت چپ سینه هنگام شنیدن نام پیامبر ﷺ، نشانه‌ای از احترام، محبت و ارادت قلبی به رسول‌الله ﷺ است. این حرکت در واقع نوعی ابراز ادب و احترام است؛ گویی انسان با گذاشتن دست بر قلب خود، محبت و جایگاه والای پیامبر ﷺ را در دلش نشان می‌دهد. نکته مهم اینکه این رفتار، یک رسم عرفی و فرهنگی میان مسلمانان است، نه …

❤27

12 Nov 2026, 10:30 UTC762 views21 reactionsread 14 November 2026
Video

وقتی زندگی تازه شروع می‌شود ☝️ مرد جوانی به دست شیخ صلاح البدیر، امام مسجد النبی، اسلام را پذیرفت. باشد که خداوند متعال از راضی باشد #قسمت_سی_نهم ✨در نشر نیکی ها سهیم باشیم ✨ ᓚ₇ @Kelide_iman ┈┉┈┉•▴•🇵🇸 •▴•┉┈┉┈

❤21

12 Nov 2026, 05:05 UTC750 views9 reactionsread 14 November 2026
Forwarded from @ketabehsanPhoto

روش تدبر در قرآن کریم 📌 ناشر: احسان 📌 نویسنده: عصام صالح محمد العوید 📌 مترجم: طیبه احمدی «روش تدبر در قرآن کریم»، ترجمه طیبه احمدی از اثر عصام بن صالح العویّد، توسط نشر احسان منتشر شده است. این کتاب برای کسانی است که تفکر را هدف اصلی نزول قرآن و راهی برای اصلاح قلب، تزکیه نفس و لذت بردن از کلام الهی می‌دانند. این اثر اولین گام در پروژه «آسان‌سازی فهم قرآن» است و به سه سطح تقسیم می‌شود: روش اندیشیدن، جزوه «اصول فی …

👍6❤3

11 Nov 2026, 16:53 UTC751 views18 reactionsread 14 November 2026

هیچ چیزی چندش‌آورتر از احترامی که از ترس نشات گرفته نیست. #آلبر_کامو @Kelide_iman

👍13❤5

11 Nov 2026, 10:32 UTC848 views27 reactionsread 14 November 2026
Video

صحنه ای از پیروزی ایمان در برابر کفر ☝️ خواهرمان آمریتا از اسپانیا قلبش سرشار از ایمان شده و بهنگام قرائت شهادتین گریه می‌کند.. 🕋☝️ #قسمت_سی_هشت ✨در نشر نیکی ها سهیم باشیم ✨ ᓚ₇ @Kelide_iman ┈┉┈┉•▴•🇵🇸 •▴•┉┈┉┈

❤27

10 Nov 2026, 17:34 UTC849 views24 reactionsread 14 November 2026

امام حسن بصری می‌فرماید: " از بلایا و مصائبی که دامن گیرتان می‌شود احساس دلتنگی و ناخوشنودی نکنید.. چه بسا چیزی که موجب ناخوشنودی توست رستگاری و نجاتت در آن باشد و چه بسا چیزی که تو آن را ترجیح می‌دهی و دوستش داری، موجب نابودی و هلاکت تو باشد " (تفسير الثعلبي ٢ / ١٣٨) @Kelide_iman

❤24

10 Nov 2026, 10:34 UTC960 views23 reactionsread 14 November 2026
Video

. خواهر تازه متولد شده☝️ و دفتر زندگی اش کاملاً سفید است #قسمت_سی_هفت ✨در نشر نیکی ها سهیم باشیم ✨ ᓚ₇ @Kelide_iman ┈┉┈┉•▴•🇵🇸 •▴•┉┈┉┈

❤23

9 Nov 2026, 17:09 UTC934 views21 reactionsread 14 November 2026
Voice message

Voice message, posted without a caption

❤13😁6❤‍🔥2

Showing the 12 most recent of 153 posts we hold for @kelide_iman. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The 3 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

3 Nov 2026, 05:51 UTCAnonymous Poll169 voters

اولین کسی که دو جایز نوبل، فیزیک و شیمی رو دریافت کرد؟

  1. آلبرت انیشتین34%
  2. ماری کوری69%

The shares total 103%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

15 Aug 2026, 18:13 UTCAnonymous Quiz240 voters

اولین آیاتی که نازل شد در کدام سوره مبارکه است؟

  1. الفاتحه6%
  2. البقره10%
  3. طه2%
  4. العلق82%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

9 Aug 2026, 18:58 UTCAnonymous Quiz267 voters

بر اساس حدیث بخاری: هر کار نیک..... است،

  1. عبادت48%
  2. صدقه48%
  3. جهاد3%
  4. ایثار1%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 153 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 14 November 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 7 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

نشیدهای محمدی
@Nashidhaimuhamadi · 19,262
Telegram ranks this channel #40 of 59 here — alongside 58 others — read 9 September 2026
جنبش دادخواهان و آزادگان
@jda_jonbesh · 29,990
Telegram ranks this channel #73 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 7 September 2026
کانال شیخ محمدصالح پردل
@sh_pordell · 25,579
Telegram ranks this channel #78 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 14 September 2026

This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“کلید ایمان” (@kelide_iman), 9,613 subscribers as measured 14 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/kelide_iman.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.