Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

ᅠ #𝗦𝘂𝗻𝗿𝗶𝘀𝗲.𝙥𝙤𝙧𝙩

@kelaport

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

157subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 9 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002568066956
TypeChannel
Username@kelaport
CreatedBetween 1 March 2025 and 22 July 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded9 August 2026
Last confirmed live9 August 2026
Measurements held2
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 9 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/kelaport

Growth

1579 Aug 2026, 15:46 — 157 subscribers9 Aug 2026, 17:02 — 157 subscribers9 Aug 2026, 15:469 Aug 2026, 17:02
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 156–158 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
9 Aug 2026, 17:02157no change
9 Aug 2026, 15:46157first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 22 July 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 8 November 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

631 reactions across 20 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 21.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 624668657946146145113621.6%
custom 541351635772561214613120.8%
custom 630292829573428632711418.1%
custom 53190157513848519487211.4%
custom 5346005751074680968548.56%
custom 5370932688993656500507.92%
custom 5350529846285976382253.96%
custom 5352557770929355742193.01%
custom 5350346150534727392111.74%
custom 5350356346787085714101.58%
custom 535074545364423784971.11%
custom 535075851463978282320.317%

Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 631reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 22 July 2025 to 8 November 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
57
across the posts below
Posts paid on
6
of 20 we hold a reading for · 30%
Most on one post
20
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @kelaport. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 22 July 2025 to 8 November 2025. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

8 Nov 2025, 18:24 UTC989 views55 reactions13 Starsread 9 August 2026
Photo

БУ скучали? я по вам тоже пришла спустя 2 МЕСЯЦА с баннером для моего инфо! зацените кстати вернусь возможно скоро @rushpng

custom 531901575138485194824custom 534600575107468096816custom 537093268899365650015

6 Sept 2025, 15:04 UTC≈1,460 views68 reactions3 Starsread 9 August 2026
Photo

#banner #practice 06.09 — I can't remember.. What happened in September новая работа - 35 рк

custom 531901575138485194830custom 534600575107468096820custom 537093268899365650018

4 Sept 2025, 18:21 UTC≈1,660 views51 reactions20 Starsread 9 August 2026
Photo

🌕 it's filthy disgusting ugly i'm sure ❌❌❌❌orders? !closed! ❌❌🔡DESIGNER - @flloerx . . . ❌BOT ❌PRICE ❌❌❌ ❌🤩🤩🤩 ❌QUESTIONNAIRE ❌🤩 〰〰〰〰〰〰〰〰〰〰 HASHTAGS: #banner • #avatar • #poster • #practice • #collab • #щп • #order • #formyself • #collage ❌❌❌❌❌❌05.09 — ??.??

custom 534600575107468096818custom 537093268899365650017custom 531901575138485194816

29 Aug 2025, 20:14 UTC≈1,340 views46 reactions10 Starsread 9 August 2026
Photo

#banner #practice роблокс удалила мама.. новая работа - 25 рк

custom 624668657946146145118custom 541351635772561214614custom 630292829573428632714

26 Aug 2025, 17:05 UTC≈1,150 views44 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

#banner #practice попытка номер 2, попытка номер 1 новая работа - 25 рк

custom 541351635772561214618custom 630292829573428632714custom 624668657946146145112

26 Aug 2025, 13:22 UTC≈1,070 views46 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

#avatar #practice я ослепла от яркости новая работа - 25 рк

custom 541351635772561214621custom 624668657946146145114custom 630292829573428632711

24 Aug 2025, 16:17 UTC895 views28 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

#banner #practice успешно все набрали, умнички новая работа - 25 рк

custom 541351635772561214612custom 62466865794614614519custom 63029282957342863277

24 Aug 2025, 12:15 UTC857 views40 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

#banner #practice новая работа - 25 рк

custom 624668657946146145120custom 541351635772561214610custom 630292829573428632710

22 Aug 2025, 18:33 UTC865 views52 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

#avatar #practice новая работа - 25 рк

custom 541351635772561214618custom 624668657946146145118custom 630292829573428632716

22 Aug 2025, 12:36 UTC696 views28 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

❌❌❌ CANDLE QUEEN 🌟🌟🌟 🤩🤩 She always knew 🤩🤩 how to get her way 🤩🤩 And someone will 🌟🌟 surely come to play ❌❌ #banner #practice @HSRpng

custom 630292829573428632713custom 54135163577256121468custom 62466865794614614517

20 Aug 2025, 17:21 UTC692 views15 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

new work... tags: #banner #practice ⚠️ ⬛ Navigation — Me — boost⬛ чето новенькое от меня, мне даже понравилось делать такое time: 0:34 ❌ 🤩reactions?🤩

custom 63029282957342863277custom 54135163577256121465custom 62466865794614614513

20 Aug 2025, 15:31 UTC649 views4 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @milkyportPhoto

мини - и̲ʜт̲е̲р̲ακτи̲в̲ / результаты для: @kelaport вкусная игра с размытием, подбор цветов и расположение рендеров, картинка не выглядит плоской и радует еще и тенями и светяшками на некоторых местах. спасибо за участие! картинки абсолютно рандомные 🥹

custom 62466865794614614514

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @kelaport. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 979,324 of 1,189,255entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“ᅠ #𝗦𝘂𝗻𝗿𝗶𝘀𝗲.𝙥𝙤𝙧𝙩” (@kelaport), 157 subscribers as measured 9 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/kelaport.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.