Channel
@kekpyq
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
32subscribers
+21 since we began measuring on 9 September 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1004349382916 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @kekpyq |
| Created | 8 September 2026 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 12 September 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| On Telegram | t.me/kekpyq |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Sept 2026, 11:23 | 32 | no change |
| 11 Sept 2026, 18:58 | 32 | +21 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 11:17 | 11 | first reading |
12 posts held, back to 8 September 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 2 of 7 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 10 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 12 (8 September 2026 – 10 September 2026) |
| Views total | 2,666 |
| Reactions total | 1 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 12 Sept 2026, 11:23 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
1 reaction across 1 post, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 1 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 2 of the 12 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 12 most recent posts we hold, published 8 September 2026 to 10 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
♡ 芷宁严选 ♡ ⌚️ 评价时间：2026-09-10 👩🏻🎓 服务老师：渴渴 👨🏻💻 留名：匿名 颜值：9.1 环境：8.9 身材：9 态度：9 服务：9.3 人照：8.8 综合：9.02 💌 服务过程 ： 今天去体验了渴渴老师，四川妹子，刚来南京没多久，也是第一次下海。 黑丝一穿确实有点勾人，刚见面还有点害羞，那股青涩劲反而更让人上头。 亲亲、口、69这些基本都能配合，虽然手法还有点嫩，但胜在人听话，你怎么带她就怎么跟，熟悉以后明显越来越放得开，互动起来也更有感觉。 新人玩的就是这种青涩和新鲜感，嫩嫩的又愿意配合，整个过程下来挺舒服，确实有点让人意犹未尽。 🔗 老师资料 ：https://t.me/chasenj_lsda/1208
开课了哥哥们
今天晚上10点以后还有空哥哥们
【妹妹花名】：渴渴 @keke03n 【报告署名】：匿 【验证时间】：9月9日 【验证地点】：新街口 【服务类别】：98 【修车水费】：700p(工兵有优惠) 【妹妹类型】：羞涩反差精神小妹 【颜值身材】： ｛年龄｝: 22 ｛颜值｝：和频道最后视频一致 ｛皮肤｝：黄皮偏白 ｛罩杯｝：B微乳 ｛身高｝：165 ｛体重｝：100 ｛赘肉｝：无 ｛颜值综合打分｝：8分 ｛身材综合打分｝：8.5分 【服务质量】：听话 ｛服务内容｝：嫩妹三件套 ｛服务水平｝：嫩妹级 ｛服务态度｝：一般，无机车行为 ｛服务综合打分｝：7 【纹身疤痕】：🈚️ 【是否吸烟】：否 【课室卫生】：新街口大厦，干净整洁 【周边环境】：地铁口公寓，无门禁。 【综合打分】：8 【综和评述】 ｛优势｝：嫩妹，反差，筷子腿，粉嫩小胸胸。 ｛不足｝：服务简单，只能亲不能🐍 【过程概述】：妹子一身白色水手服打扮，相貌颜值可以的。身材纤细，筷子腿白又长，双臂也细而白，…
Channel name was changed to «渴渴朋友圈频道»
现在有空的哥哥们
Photo, posted without a caption
渴渴朋友圈频道 pinned a photo
Photo, posted without a caption
❤1
Channel name was changed to «可可朋友圈频道»
Channel photo updated
Channel created
Showing the 12 most recent of 12 posts we hold for @kekpyq. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“渴渴朋友圈频道” (@kekpyq), 32 subscribers as measured 12 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/kekpyq.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.